Skip to content

EPA library

Public Health and Preventive Medicine

Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada · 1.0 · 27 EPAs

Also available in French.

Every EPA in the published guide, shown as the form DebriefMD fills in, with its fields and answer options.

Transition to Discipline

  • TTD-1

    Interpreting data relevant to the health of a population or community

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on identifying, accessing, and interpreting existing data sources (qualitative and/or quantitative) used in the assessment of the health of a community or population. - The observation of this EPA is based on the preparation of a short written report or an oral presentation. - For the achievement of this EPA, the resident must use at least two sources of data and assess at least three domains. - Examples of data sources include: a community profile from StatsCan; data from the ministry of health or the public health unit; surveillance data; clinical databases; surveys. - Examples of the domains of the health of a community or population include determinants of health, health system utilization, risk behaviours, and incidence and prevalence of disease.

    Review of report or oral presentation by supervisor or Core or TTP PHPM resident Use Form 1. Form collects information on - Domains (select all that apply): population demographics; health system utilization; incidence and prevalence of disease; assessment of wellness; comparison with other jurisdictions; determinants of health; risk behaviours; specific populations (e.g., structurally disadvantaged) - Data source (write in): PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025) Collect 1 observation of achievement - At least 3 domains, of which one must be population demographics - At least 2 sources of data

    Suggested observations: 1

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Domains

    1. population demographics
    2. health system utilization
    3. incidence and prevalence of disease
    4. assessment of wellness
    5. comparison with other jurisdictions
    6. determinants of health
    7. risk behaviours
    8. specific populations (e.g., structurally disadvantaged)

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Select data sources that are appropriate for the purposes of an assessment
    • ME 2.2 Identify the determinants of health relevant to the issue
    • ME 2.2 Appraise the validity and relevance of a data set
    • ME 2.2 Recognize the limitations of a data set
    • ME 2.2 Integrate and synthesize different data
    • ME 2.2 Form a conclusion about the health of a community or population
    • ME 2.2 Synthesize information to formulate a summary of the issue PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTD-2

    Presenting population or public health issues in oral and written form

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on effective oral and written communication of simple public health issues in a manner appropriate to the audience. - This includes accurate inclusion and synthesis of relevant issues, effective presentation in written and oral form, and response to questions as needed. - At this stage, it is expected that the audience would be internal to the training context, such as submission of a report to a supervisor or presentation to other residents or a health unit committee meeting. - The observation of this EPA requires both review of a written document as well as observation of an oral presentation; this may be two different topics or the same topic in both formats.

    Review of written report and/or direct observation of oral presentation by supervisor or Core or TTP PHPM resident Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Format: report; oral presentation Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 1 oral presentation - At least 1 written report

    Suggested observations: 2

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Format

    1. report
    2. oral presentation

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Gather information pertinent to the issue
    • ME 2.2 Synthesize information to formulate a summary of the issue

    Communicator

    • COM 5.1 Convey information clearly and concisely
    • COM 5.1 Select language and terminology that is appropriate for the intended audience
    • COM 5.1 Respond to questions in an appropriate manner PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTD-3

    Working effectively within a team

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the role of the PHPM specialist as a member of an interprofessional team. - This includes contributing to the work of the team, understanding and respecting the roles of other team members, and demonstrating appropriate professional behaviours. - The observation of this EPA is based on a period of time of at least one week.

    Direct observation by supervisor with input from other members of the team Use Form 1 Collect 1 observation of achievement

    Suggested observations: 1

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Collaborator

    • COL 2.1 Treat team members with respect
    • COL 1.2 Demonstrate an understanding of the scope and expertise of other team members
    • COL 1.3 Communicate clearly with other team members

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Demonstrate punctuality
    • P 1.1 Behave in a professional manner
    • P 1.1 Complete assigned responsibilities PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

Foundations

  • F-1

    Applying qualitative and quantitative methods of data analysis and interpreting results

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA links the academic training of PHPM to public health practice. - The focus of this EPA is applying knowledge of various qualitative and quantitative methods to explain differences in health and health-related behaviours. - This includes selection and application of specific methods, and appraisal of their results and their limitations and biases. - It does not require the resident to perform the data collection nor the data analysis. - This EPA may be observed with any public health question, project, or initiative.

    Direct observation and/or review of written report and discussion by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Method: qualitative; quantitative; mixed Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 1 qualitative method - At least 1 quantitative method

    Suggested observations: 3

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Method

    1. qualitative
    2. quantitative
    3. mixed

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of qualitative and quantitative methods used to explore knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, behaviours, and public health interventions
    • ME 2.2 Appraise the validity and relevance of a data set in order to assess the quality and fit for purpose
    • ME 2.2 Select appropriate qualitative and/or quantitative methods and analytic tests
    • ME 2.2 Develop a protocol for the data analysis
    • ME 2.2 Interpret the results of qualitative and/or quantitative analyses
    • ME 2.2 Identify the limitations of the data set and the data analyses

    Scholar

    • S 4.4 Pose relevant and appropriately constructed questions amenable to scholarly inquiry
    • S 4.5 Summarize and communicate the findings in oral or written form PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-2

    Performing critical appraisal of literature

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on critical appraisal of literature as a basis for informed decisions. - This observation of this EPA is based on presentation of a critical paper review at journal club or other venue. - The paper(s) may include either quantitative or qualitative methods and may include systematic reviews as well as primary research papers.

    Direct observation or review of written report by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Methods (select all that apply): qualitative; quantitative - Type of study: primary; systematic review; other type of study Collect at least 3 observations of achievement - At least 1 with qualitative methods - At least 1 with quantitative methods - At least 1 primary study - At least 1 systematic review

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Methods

    1. qualitative
    2. quantitative

    Type of study

    1. primary
    2. systematic review
    3. other type of study

    Scholar

    • S 3.2 Identify and select relevant high-quality evidence
    • S 3.3 Apply the concepts of internal and external validity
    • S 3.3 Recognize and evaluate sources of bias, including conflicts of interest
    • S 3.3 Interpret findings and critique their relevance
    • S 3.1 Identify remaining gaps in knowledge and questions for further investigation
    • S 2.4 Present the information in an organized manner PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-3

    Applying a PHPM framework in reflections on individual patient interactions

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA links clinical training to the PHPM approach to health assessment. - This includes a formulation of the patient’s case that includes an assessment and analysis of the determinants of health, the patient’s ability to access services and resources, and considerations of health equity. - It includes applying knowledge of the effectiveness of individual versus population- based interventions. - The observation of this EPA is based on selection and preparation of a case, using the PHPM framework, for discussion with a supervisor.

    Case discussion and review of resident’s reflection on the case by supervisor Use Form 1 Collect 3 observations of achievement

    Suggested observations: 3

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 5.2 Gather information about a patient’s determinants of health
    • ME 5.2 Summarize the patient’s health issues and develop a biopsychosocial formulation of their needs
    • ME 5.2 Incorporate health equity concerns into the case formulation
    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of the effectiveness of individual versus population-based interventions

    Communicator

    • COM 2.3 Seek and synthesize relevant information from other sources (e.g. family, medical record, other health professionals)

    Health Advocate

    • HA 1.1 Analyze a patient’s need for and access to health services and other resources
    • HA 1.1 Identify resources or agencies that address the patient’s needs
    • HA 1.1 Identify opportunities and propose interventions to improve the patient’s determinants of health PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-4

    Providing preventive health care for individual patients

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on risk reduction and preventive care in the primary care setting for patients of all ages. - This includes age-appropriate screening for cancer and risk factors for chronic disease, as well as prenatal screening, well-child visits, immunization, and substance use and mental health screening, and, as relevant, patient counselling. - This EPA includes applying the principles of culturally safe practice and trauma- informed care in patient interactions, collecting information about the patient’s determinants of health, and responding to the patient’s individual needs. - Examples of responding to the patient’s needs include adapting the treatment or care plan (e.g. due to finances, barriers to care), providing referral to community resources (e.g. for food insecurity or homelessness), and facilitating access to treatment or resources.

    Direct observation and/or case discussion or chart review by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Issue (select all that apply): prenatal screening; well-child visit; immunization; substance use/mental health screening; disease screening; acute or chronic disease risk; other issue - Age group: infant; child; adolescent; adult; pregnancy; older adult - Structurally disadvantaged group: no; yes - Observation (select all that apply): direct; case discussion or chart review Collect 10 observations of achievement - A variety of issues - A variety of age groups - At least 3 observations in a patient from a structurally disadvantaged group - At least 4 direct observations

    Suggested observations: 10

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Issue

    1. prenatal screening
    2. well-child visit
    3. immunization
    4. substance use/mental health screening
    5. disease screening
    6. acute or chronic disease risk
    7. other issue

    Age group

    1. infant
    2. child
    3. adolescent
    4. adult
    5. pregnancy
    6. older adult

    Structurally disadvantaged group

    1. no
    2. yes

    Observation

    1. direct
    2. case discussion or chart review

    Medical Expert

    • ME 5.2 Elicit an accurate and relevant history
    • ME 5.2 Perform a physical examination
    • ME 5.2 Adapt the clinical assessment to the patient’s age and health status
    • ME 5.4 Develop a plan for primary and/or secondary preventive care
    • ME 5.4 Recognize, and address as appropriate, the public health implications of a patient’s presentation, including the epidemiology of the condition(s) and its determinants PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Communicator

    • COM 2.3 Seek and synthesize relevant information from other sources (e.g. family, medical record, other health professionals) PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)
    • COM 3.1 Use plain language and avoid medical jargon
    • COM 3.1 Use strategies to verify and validate the patient’s/family’s understanding

    Health Advocate

    • HA 1.2 Work with the patient/family to increase a shared understanding of health, health service, and determinants of health needs
    • HA 1.2 Counsel and support patients, appropriate to their context
    • HA 1.3 Identify opportunities for relevant health surveillance, disease prevention, and health promotion

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-5

    Assessing and managing patients with a presentation relevant to public health

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on direct patient care for patients presenting with diseases or exposures that have public health implications, including assessment, diagnosis using appropriate tests, and development of a management plan. - Examples include: STI; TB; travel-related diseases; blood-borne infections; vaccine- preventable disease; environmental exposures; animal exposures; food-borne disease; vector-borne disease; occupational exposure/injury; and chronic diseases. - This includes applying the principles of culturally safe practice and trauma-informed care in patient interactions. - This EPA may be observed in a primary care clinic, emergency department, specialized clinic (e.g., ID clinic, STD clinic, etc.), or inpatient setting.

    Direct observation and/or case discussion by supervising physician Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Setting: primary care clinic; ED; specialized clinic; inpatient; other - Presentation: STI; TB; travel-related disease; blood-borne infection; vaccine- preventable disease; environmental exposure; animal exposure; food-borne illness; vector-borne disease; occupational exposure/injury; chronic disease; adverse event following immunization; other - Contact tracing/public health follow-up: yes; no Collect 10 observations of achievement - At least 2 different settings - At least 4 different presentations - At least 2 cases in which contact tracing or public health follow-up was indicated

    Suggested observations: 10

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Setting

    1. primary care clinic
    2. ED
    3. specialized clinic
    4. inpatient
    5. other

    Presentation

    1. STI
    2. TB
    3. travel-related disease
    4. blood-borne infection
    5. vaccine- preventable disease
    6. environmental exposure
    7. animal exposure
    8. food-borne illness
    9. vector-borne disease
    10. occupational exposure/injury
    11. chronic disease
    12. adverse event following immunization
    13. other

    Contact tracing/public health follow-up

    1. yes
    2. no

    Medical Expert

    • ME 5.2 Elicit an accurate and relevant history
    • ME 5.2 Perform a physical examination PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)
    • ME 5.2 Select and/or interpret appropriate investigations
    • ME 5.2 Develop a differential diagnosis relevant to the patient’s presentation
    • ME 5.4 Develop a plan for management
    • ME 5.4 Recognize, and address as appropriate, the public health implications of a patient’s presentation, including the epidemiology of the condition(s) and its determinants
    • ME 5.4 Determine the need for consultation with another health care professional
    • ME 5.4 Make arrangements for follow-up on results of investigation and response to treatment

    Communicator

    • COM 1.1 Approach the interaction in a manner that is respectful, non- judgmental, culturally safe, and trauma-informed
    • COM 1.6 Explore the patient’s beliefs, concerns, expectations, and experiences relevant to the presenting condition
    • COM 2.3 Seek and synthesize relevant information from other sources (e.g. family, medical record, other health professionals)
    • COM 5.1 Document the encounter to convey the assessment, clinical reasoning, and the rationale for decisions

    Professional

    • P 3.1 Adhere to requirements for reporting and notification of public health authorities PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-6

    Working effectively within a clinical team

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the role of a member of an interprofessional team that may include residents, students, physicians, nurses, and other health care professionals. - This includes communicating and working effectively with other team members, exhibiting professional behaviours, and responding to requests for assistance. - The observation of this EPA is based on a period of time of at least one week. - This EPA may be observed in any clinical setting.

    Direct observation by supervisor with input from other members of the team Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Setting: inpatient; outpatient; other Collect 2 observations of achievement

    Suggested observations: 2

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Setting

    1. inpatient
    2. outpatient
    3. other

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.6 Demonstrate insight into one’s own limits of expertise

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with physicians and other health care professionals
    • COL 1.2 Make effective use of the scope and expertise of other health care professionals
    • COL 1.2 Work effectively as a member of the clinical team PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Respond punctually to requests for assistance
    • P 1.1 Behave in a professional manner

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

Core

  • C-1

    Conducting assessments

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on performance of the key steps of an assessment; it does not require completion of the assessment from start to finish. - Observation focuses on the following steps: plan the assessment strategy/ framework; collect and/or identify relevant data/information (quantitative and/or qualitative); analyze data/information; synthesize data/information from multiple sources; determine the gap and/or significance; recommend action. - This EPA may be observed in a variety of PHPM activities. Examples include population health status assessment, health surveillance and its determinants, health needs assessment, health impact assessment, environmental health risk assessment, and health equity audits.

    Direct observation and review of documents by supervisor, with input from other members of the team if relevant Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Type of assessment: population health status; health needs; health impact; environmental health risk; health equity; other assessment - Step completed (select all that apply): plan; collect; analyze; synthesize; determine; recommend - Placement: public health agency; health authority; environmental health; occupational health; other government setting; other Collect at least 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 different types of assessments - At least 1 observation of each step

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Type of assessment

    1. population health status
    2. health needs
    3. health impact
    4. environmental health risk
    5. health equity
    6. other assessment

    Step completed

    1. plan
    2. collect
    3. analyze
    4. synthesize
    5. determine
    6. recommend

    Placement

    1. public health agency
    2. health authority
    3. environmental health
    4. occupational health
    5. other government setting
    6. other

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.1 Define the issue, context, and partners
    • ME 2.2 Develop a plan for the assessment
    • ME 2.2 Collect and/or access relevant data and/or information
    • ME 2.2 Analyze the data/information using appropriate methods
    • ME 2.2 Address the legal and ethical aspects of data collection and analysis
    • ME 2.2 Synthesize and interpret data PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)
    • ME 2.4 Develop options and recommendations

    Health Advocate

    • HA 2.1 Incorporate health equity considerations PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-2

    Designing, developing, or adjusting policies, programs, and other interventions

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the key steps of designing and developing population health interventions; the resident may complete one or more of these steps for any specific project. - This EPA includes incorporating the perspectives and concerns of structurally disadvantaged populations into the development of interventions. - Observation focuses on the following steps: identify the scope of the problem or issue; perform a review for known interventions and appraise the evidence; analyze the potential options; consider the context, partners, and the resource implications; select a course of action and provide rationale for the choice. - This EPA must be observed in a variety of PHPM activities. Examples include a variety of proposed interventions including new policy development or revision of existing policy, new program development or a redesign of an existing program, educational programs, emergency planning, and health promotion campaigns.

    Direct observation and review of documents by supervisor, with input from other members of the team if relevant Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Types of intervention: new policy, program, or other intervention; modification/update/redesign of existing policy, program, or other intervention; other activity - Step completed (select all that apply): identify scope; appraise evidence for interventions; analyze options; context, partner, and/or resource implications; select course of action - Setting: local/community; regional; provincial; national - Placement: public health agency; health authority; environmental health; occupational health; other government setting; other Collect at least 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 different types of interventions or programs - At least 1 observation for each step

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Types of intervention

    1. new policy, program, or other intervention
    2. modification/update/redesign of existing policy, program, or other intervention
    3. other activity

    Step completed

    1. identify scope
    2. appraise evidence for interventions
    3. analyze options
    4. context, partner, and/or resource implications
    5. select course of action

    Setting

    1. local/community
    2. regional
    3. provincial
    4. national

    Placement

    1. public health agency
    2. health authority
    3. environmental health
    4. occupational health
    5. other government setting
    6. other

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Characterize the issue content, context, process, and actors
    • ME 3.1 Analyze potential interventions PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)
    • ME 3.3 Assess resource implications (financial and non-financial), using tools such as logic models or economic analysis as appropriate
    • ME 3.2 Examine and address ethical and legal aspects
    • ME 3.3 Prioritize interventions, when necessary
    • ME 3.4 Select a course(s) of action
    • ME 3.4 Justify the selected intervention/program based on issue content, context, process, and actors
    • ME 3.4 Establish a plan for evaluation (structure, process, outcome) PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Health Advocate

    • HA 2.1 Incorporate health equity considerations

    Scholar

    • S 3.3 Perform a review for possible interventions (e.g., literature review, environmental scan)
    • S 3.4 Integrate evidence and best practice

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-3

    Implementing policies, programs, and other interventions

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on applying the principles of change management and implementation science to implement public health interventions and program activities. - This EPA includes incorporating the perspectives and concerns of structurally disadvantaged populations into the implementation of interventions. - This may include any or all of the following aspects of this task: working with partners; knowledge translation; social marketing; developing measures to track outcome. - Project management may be an important part of this task, but those skills are a focus of another EPA. - This EPA must be observed in a variety of PHPM activities. Examples include a variety of proposed interventions including new policy development or revision of existing policy, new program development or a redesign of an existing program, educational programs, and health promotion and protection interventions.

    Direct observation and review of documents by supervisor, with input from other members of the team and/or partners if relevant Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Activity: new policy, program, or other intervention; modification/update/redesign of policy, program, or other intervention; other activity - Aspect of task (select all that apply): working with partners; knowledge translation; social marketing; developing measures to track outcomes - Setting: local/community; regional; provincial; national - Placement: public health agency; health authority; environmental health; occupational health; other government setting; other Collect at least 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 different activities - At least 1 observation of each of the aspects of the task - At least 2 different settings

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Activity

    1. new policy, program, or other intervention
    2. modification/update/redesign of policy, program, or other intervention
    3. other activity

    Aspect of task

    1. working with partners
    2. knowledge translation
    3. social marketing
    4. developing measures to track outcomes

    Setting

    1. local/community
    2. regional
    3. provincial
    4. national

    Placement

    1. public health agency
    2. health authority
    3. environmental health
    4. occupational health
    5. other government setting
    6. other

    Medical Expert

    • ME 3.4 Review the rationale for the selected intervention based on issue content, context, process, and actors
    • ME 3.4 Select one or more framework or tool for implementation, for both process and content PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)
    • ME 3.2 Examine and address ethical and legal aspects
    • ME 3.4 Analyze and select key partners, ensuring broad inclusion of perspectives
    • ME 3.4 Identify feasibility factors, including facilitating factors and potential barriers
    • ME 3.4 Apply principles relevant to implementation such as communication best practices, knowledge translation, and social marketing
    • ME 3.4 Coordinate actions depending on the context, including existing policies and programs
    • ME 3.4 Reassess the plan for evaluation and collect evaluation data, as appropriate PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.1 Engage key partners

    Health Advocate

    • HA 2.1 Incorporate health equity considerations

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-4

    Evaluating policies, programs, and other interventions

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the key steps of program evaluation; the resident may complete one or more of these steps for any specific project. - This EPA includes incorporating the perspectives and concerns of structurally disadvantaged populations into the evaluation of interventions. - Observation focuses on the following steps: collect data/outcomes/partner feedback; analyze data/outcomes/feedback; interpret the findings and the reasons for the findings; appraise the intervention or program against the purpose of the intervention/program; and provide recommendations. - This EPA must be observed in a variety of PHPM activities. Examples include new policy development or revision of existing policy, new program development or a redesign of an existing program, marketing campaigns, educational programs, and health promotion campaigns.

    Direct observation and review of documents by supervisor, with input from other members of the team and/or partners if relevant Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Activity: new policy, program, or other intervention; modification/update/redesign of existing policy, program, or other intervention; other activity - Step completed (select all that apply): collect data/outcomes/feedback; analyze data/outcomes/feedback; interpret findings; appraise; provide recommendations - Setting: local/community; regional; provincial; national - Placement: public health agency; health authority; environmental health; occupational health; other government setting; other Collect at least 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 different activities - At least 1 observation for each step

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Activity

    1. new policy, program, or other intervention
    2. modification/update/redesign of existing policy, program, or other intervention
    3. other activity

    Step completed

    1. collect data/outcomes/feedback
    2. analyze data/outcomes/feedback
    3. interpret findings
    4. appraise
    5. provide recommendations

    Setting

    1. local/community
    2. regional
    3. provincial
    4. national

    Placement

    1. public health agency
    2. health authority
    3. environmental health
    4. occupational health
    5. other government setting
    6. other

    Medical Expert

    • ME 3.4 Create or confirm evaluation plan, including appropriate data sources and methods of data collection/analysis/dissemination
    • ME 2.2 Incorporate considerations of data governance and ownership, including organizational processes and approvals, to determine if there is a need to consult with other organizations PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)
    • ME 2.2 Address the legal and ethical aspects of data collection and analysis
    • ME 4.1 Describe the intervention, including structures, processes, and outcomes (such as health outcomes, equity, provider experience, public experience)
    • ME 2.2 Collect and/or access relevant data and/or information
    • ME 2.2 Analyze the data/information using appropriate methods
    • ME 4.1 Formulate and justify conclusions and recommendations

    Communicator

    • COM 5.1 Share and use conclusions, lessons, and recommendations PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.1 Engage key partners

    Health Advocate

    • HA 2.1 Incorporate health equity considerations

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-5

    Conducting analyses of health policy

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on developing an understanding of an issue, including a strategic analysis of the environment and actors who are involved and providing options and recommendations using a conceptual frame. - It may include a health impact assessment approach as well as considerations of health equity, and may include quantitative or qualitative components (or both). - This EPA may be observed with a variety of issues, examples include urban planning, environmental health, and communicable disease/chronic disease prevention.

    Direct observation and review of documents/written report by supervisor, which may include input from other public health team members Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Portion completed (select all that apply): strategic analysis; partner analysis; health impact assessment; health equity impact; policy brief with recommendations; other - Issue (write in): Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 1 of each portion completed - At least 2 different issues

    Suggested observations: 2

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Portion completed

    1. strategic analysis
    2. partner analysis
    3. health impact assessment
    4. health equity impact
    5. policy brief with recommendations
    6. other

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.1 Define the issue, context, and partners
    • ME 2.2 Analyze key partners’ positions on the issue
    • ME 2.2 Perform an environmental scan
    • ME 2.2 Perform a descriptive and explanatory analysis
    • ME 2.4 Develop options and recommendations PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Health Advocate

    • HA 2.1 Incorporate health equity considerations

    Professional

    • P 3.1 Apply knowledge of existing policies and guidelines

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-6

    Providing case and contact management for conditions relevant to public health

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on public health management involving individual cases and contacts. - This includes ascertaining the etiology and/or source and verifying the patient has received appropriate treatment (and/or provide recommendations), and any other case management actions with consideration to any relevant legal/regulatory or ethical issues. - It also includes determining whether the case has broader implications requiring contact tracing and/or treatment/prophylaxis, and may include handing over the case, ongoing management, and/or follow-up and any required reporting. - This EPA includes completing the documentation. - Examples include: transmittable infections (enteric, respiratory, TB, STI, blood- borne); vector-borne infections; vaccine-preventable illnesses; animal bites; and environmental exposures.

    Case review and/or review of documentation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Domains: enteric; vector-borne; blood-borne; sexually transmitted; respiratory; TB; animal bite; vaccine-preventable; environmental; adverse event following immunization; other - Case with contact implications: yes; no Collect 8 observations of achievement - At least 6 domains - At least 1 requiring contact follow-up

    Suggested observations: 8

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Domains

    1. enteric
    2. vector-borne
    3. blood-borne
    4. sexually transmitted
    5. respiratory
    6. TB
    7. animal bite
    8. vaccine-preventable
    9. environmental
    10. adverse event following immunization
    11. other

    Case with contact implications

    1. yes
    2. no

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Investigate a case and, if relevant, contacts
    • ME 2.2 Conduct a risk assessment
    • ME 2.4 Develop a management plan for immediate and ongoing prevention and control
    • ME 2.4 Determine the need to apply legal measures

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.2 Work effectively with, and when applicable lead, members of the public health team
    • COL 4.1 Identify cases requiring handover for ongoing management and/or follow-up
    • COL 1.2 Work effectively with partners and experts in other sectors involved in the response to an investigation PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Professional

    • P 3.1 Adhere to requirements for mandatory reporting PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-7

    Investigating and managing outbreaks or incidents

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA includes all aspects of identifying and responding to a public health incident that impacts more than one person. - This includes (as appropriate to the event) investigation, risk assessment, risk mitigation (such as implementing control measures), making recommendations for case management, and immediate and longer-term actions with consideration to any relevant legal/regulatory or ethical issues. - This may include actions related to public health emergency response and recovery, if relevant, and includes outbreaks/events at the local or community level. - The role of the resident may vary depending on the nature and scope of the incident. - Examples include communicable disease outbreaks (e.g., flu outbreak at a nursing home), environmental health exposures (e.g., water contamination), non- communicable diseases (e.g., cancer cluster), and occupational incidents (e.g., carbon monoxide exposure).

    Direct observation (e.g., team meetings), case review, and review of written report by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Type of event: communicable; non-communicable; environmental; occupational; other - Role of resident (write in): Collect 4 observations of achievement - At least 2 communicable - At least 2 environmental

    Suggested observations: 4

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Type of event

    1. communicable
    2. non-communicable
    3. environmental
    4. occupational
    5. other

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Gather and synthesize the data about a potential outbreak or hazard to the public’s health
    • ME 2.2 Confirm the outbreak or hazard exists
    • ME 2.2 Conduct a risk assessment
    • ME 2.4 Develop a management plan for immediate and ongoing prevention and control
    • ME 2.4 Determine the need to apply legal measures PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.2 Work effectively with, and when applicable lead, members of the public health team
    • COL 1.2 Work effectively with partners and experts in other sectors involved in the response to an outbreak or incident PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Professional

    • P 3.1 Adhere to requirements for mandatory reporting

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-8

    Managing programs and projects

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the various elements of program and project management: operational planning (e.g., timeline and deliverables); managing a budget; resource planning; business case development; risk management (time and deadlines, resource constraints, existing policies, deliverables (scope of what can be done)); and quality improvement.

    Direct and indirect observation by supervisor, with input from project sponsor and team members. This may also include review of documents (e.g., budget) Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Project or program (write in): - Portion observed (select all that apply): operational planning; budget management; human resource planning; business case development; risk management; process mapping/quality improvement; other Collect at least 2 observations of achievement - At least 3 different portions observed - At least 2 different topics

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 3.4 Develop objectives, priorities, and a timeline for the project or program
    • ME 3.4 Align objectives, activities, and outcomes with resources
    • ME 3.3 Prioritize actions within the implementation plan
    • ME 1.4 Recognize situations that may need the involvement of more experienced colleagues and seek assistance and/or feedback

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.2 Work effectively with members of the project or program team PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Leader

    • L 3.1 Develop a budget
    • L 3.1 Identify and secure needed resources
    • L 3.1 Monitor project timelines
    • L 3.1 Monitor costs, demonstrating flexibility and fiduciary accountability/responsibility
    • L 3.1 Adapt in response to unanticipated challenges or changing circumstances PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)
    • L 3.1 Use information technology effectively to manage a project

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-9

    Communicating via written documentation

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on conveying public health issues through a variety of written documentation and other communications. - This includes using structures and formats suitable for the purpose and appropriate to practice standards, synthesizing the material in a comprehensive yet concise manner, applying a logical flow of information and rhetoric to build a persuasive argument, and using language and terminology that is appropriate to the audience. - The observation of this EPA must include a variety of written formats.

    Review of written documentation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Format: report; medical decision documentation (e.g., file note or medical consultation note); policy brief; briefing note; issue note; media lines/message; email; other format Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 1 briefing note - At least 1 medical decision documentation - At least 1 other format

    Suggested observations: 3

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Format

    1. report
    2. medical decision documentation (e.g., file note or medical consultation note)
    3. policy brief
    4. briefing note
    5. issue note
    6. media lines/message
    7. email
    8. other format

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Synthesize information to formulate a summary of the issue and any recommendations

    Communicator

    • COM 5.1 Use an appropriate structure and format
    • COM 5.1 Articulate clear and succinct key messages and actions
    • COM 5.1 Organize the text in a logical and concise manner
    • COM 5.1 Ensure readability is adapted to the intended audience
    • COM 5.1 Ensure text is without significant typographical and grammatical errors
    • COM 5.1 Prepare the document in a timely manner PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Acknowledge contributions of others, including references and co- authors where appropriate

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-10

    Acting as a spokesperson for routine public health issues

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on effective oral communication of information to the public, their elected representatives, and health system and intersectoral partners. - It includes effective use of briefings, presentations, and mass media techniques where appropriate (e.g., print, radio or TV interviews), and may include creating or contributing to the communication plan and identifying key messages. - At this stage this does not include unplanned, unanticipated, or complex issues; these are an EPA of the Transition to Practice stage. - This EPA may be observed in a simulation setting.

    Direct observation and/or review of presentation materials by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Issue (write in): - Medium: briefing; media interview; public meeting; other presentation - Audience (select all that apply): lay public; news media; senior bureaucrat/elected official(s); intersectoral partner(s) - Communication strategy/plan developed: no; yes Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 3 different audiences - At least 1 observation where the resident developed the communication strategy/plan

    Suggested observations: 3

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Communicator

    • COM 5.1 Prepare key messages
    • COM 5.1 Convey information clearly and concisely
    • COM 5.1 Use terminology that is appropriate for the intended audience
    • COM 5.1 Respond to questions in an appropriate manner PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Professional

    • P 1.2 Prepare for the event, reviewing all relevant materials, information, and media messages
    • P 1.1 Use non-verbal behaviours to convey respect, poise, professionalism, and credibility
    • P 1.2 Demonstrate an appreciation of the limits of one’s own expertise
    • P 3.1 Adhere to privacy, confidentiality, and legal requirements PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-11

    Managing meetings

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the role of the chair in running an effective meeting. - This includes planning for the meeting, preparing the agenda, leading the discussion, attending to meeting flow and organization, and encouraging participation and integrating information from the team. - This includes managing group dynamics and conflicts should they occur. - This EPA includes meetings addressing routine as well as complex issues and internal as well as external partners, but achievement of this EPA does not require competence in running meetings regarding issues known to be contentious nor acting in the role of chair for external meetings.

    Direct observation by supervisor, with input from others at the meeting Use Form 1. Form collects information on: ­ Meeting attendees (select all that apply): public health team; other health care professionals; lay public; senior bureaucrats/elected officials; intersectoral partners; others Collect 2 observations of achievement

    Suggested observations: 2

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Communicator

    • COM 5.1 Document key actions and decisions and ensure communication with those responsible
    • COM 1.4 Manage one’s own non-verbal communication PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.3 Demonstrate respect for the opinions of other meeting participants
    • COL 2.2 Apply knowledge of and manage group dynamics

    Leader

    • L 3.1 Prepare an agenda and set priorities
    • L 3.1 Facilitate the meeting, attending to flow, organization, and time management
    • L 3.1 Ensure engagement of and participation by attendees
    • L 3.1 Summarize the meeting and clarify key points and discussions

    Professional

    • P 1.2 Prepare for a meeting, reviewing its purpose, background information, and list of participants
    • P 1.1 Intervene when behaviours towards other attendees undermine a respectful environment PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-12

    Working effectively with interprofessional teams and intersectoral partners

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the role of the PHPM specialist as a member of an interprofessional team that may include other health care professionals as well as community partners and individuals working in other sectors. - This includes communicating and working effectively with other team members, exhibiting professional behaviours, demonstrating cultural humility, mediating conflict, and responding to requests for assistance. - The observation of this EPA is based on a period of time of at least one week.

    Direct observation by supervisor, with input from other members of the team Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Setting: public health or other interprofessional team; intersectoral partners; health care team Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 1 observation with intersectoral partners

    Suggested observations: 2

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Setting

    1. public health or other interprofessional team
    2. intersectoral partners
    3. health care team

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.2 Make effective use of the scope and expertise of other team members
    • COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with physicians, other professionals, staff, and partners
    • COL 2.2 Listen to understand and find common ground
    • COL 2.2 Manage differences and attempt to resolve conflicts PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Respond punctually to requests for assistance
    • P 1.1 Behave in a professional manner

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-13

    Providing teaching presentations to a variety of audiences

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on preparing a presentation (selecting, synthesizing and organizing information relevant to the topic and audience) and demonstrating good presentation skills.

    Direct observation of presentation by supervisor, which may include a review of presentation materials (e.g., slides) Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Audience (select all that apply): peers; faculty; health professionals; senior decision makers; other partners; public - Topic (write in): Collect 3 observations of achievement - A variety of audiences - A variety of topics - At least 1 academic presentation

    Suggested observations: 3

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Audience

    1. peers
    2. faculty
    3. health professionals
    4. senior decision makers
    5. other partners
    6. public

    Scholar

    • S 2.4 Identify the learning needs and desired learning outcomes of others
    • S 2.4 Develop learning objectives for a teaching activity
    • S 3.3 Critically evaluate the literature
    • S 3.4 Integrate evidence and best practice
    • S 2.4 Adapt the presentation to the audience
    • S 2.4 Present the information in an organized manner
    • S 2.4 Use audiovisual aids effectively
    • S 2.4 Provide adequate time for questions and discussion PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

Transition to Practice

  • TTP-1

    Leading the delivery of public health services

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the role of the PHPM specialist as the most responsible physician in a public health service, practice, team, or unit, including on-call response. - It includes responsibility for any issues that may arise as well as ongoing work, setting priorities when there are multiple competing tasks, delegating/ distributing work, and overseeing/supporting the work of other team members. - It also includes supporting and enhancing well-being within the team. - It should also include participation in the management of the service, including human resources, finance, and planning. - The observation of this EPA is based on a period of at least two weeks in any public health setting.

    Direct and indirect observation by supervisor, which may include input from others Use Form 1 Collect 2 observations of achievement - 2 different observers

    Suggested observations: 2

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.1 Demonstrate responsibility and accountability for decisions
    • ME 1.5 Set priorities among multiple competing tasks for the work of the service

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.2 Work effectively with the interprofessional team PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)
    • COL 1.2 Support team members in their work

    Leader

    • L 3.1 Delegate and apportion workload amongst members of the team
    • L 4.1 Integrate supervisory and teaching responsibilities into the overall management of the service
    • L 3.1 Adapt to changes in demand, capacity, or resources
    • L 3.1 Manage team dynamics and adapt leadership to context
    • L 4.1 Manage one’s own time to fulfil diverse responsibilities
    • L 3.1 Provide feedback to team members on their work contributions

    Scholar

    • S 3.4 Integrate evidence and best practice into decision-making

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Work within personal limits, seeking assistance as needed PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTP-2

    Navigating complexity in PHPM practice

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the approach to complex and/or challenging issues in PHPM practice. - This may include: conditions of uncertainty; multiple partners; multiple ownership of issues; multiple sources of evidence; financial and/or human resource restrictions; and, interactions between problems (cross-overs). - These issues require a sophisticated approach encompassing political acumen and incorporating the perspectives and concerns of structurally disadvantaged populations, and include critical thinking, collaborative practices, innovation in response, and co-construction of solutions. - This EPA may be observed with any issue, in any setting, and at any phase of the involvement of the PHPM specialist.

    Direct and/or indirect observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Topic (write in): Collect 1 observation of achievement

    Suggested observations: 1

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 3.1 Determine options for action
    • ME 1.1 Demonstrate responsibility and accountability for decisions

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.3 Identify and engage with relevant perspectives

    Health Advocate

    • HA 2.1 Incorporate health equity considerations

    Scholar

    • S 3.4 Integrate evidence and best practice into decision-making

    Professional

    • P 3.1 Integrate legal and jurisdictional considerations into decision-making
    • P 1.1 Work within personal limits, seeking assistance as needed
    • P 4.1 Apply self-reflection to monitor one’s own behaviour and interactions
    • P 4.1 Maintain professional demeanour in demanding or stressful settings PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTP-3

    Acting as a spokesperson

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on effective communication of information to the public, their elected representatives, and health system and intersectoral partners. - It includes creating or contributing to a communication plan and identifying key messages, and effective use of briefings, presentations, and mass media techniques where appropriate (e.g., TV interviews). - At this stage, this includes urgent, unanticipated, or complex issues. - This EPA may be observed in a simulation setting.

    Direct observation and/or review of presentation materials by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Issue (write in): - Medium: briefing; media interview; public meeting; other presentation - Audience: lay public; news media; senior bureaucrats/elected officials; intersectoral partner - Simulation: no; yes Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 different audiences - At least 1 media interview

    Suggested observations: 2

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Communicator

    • COM 5.1 Prepare key messages
    • COM 5.1 Convey information clearly and concisely
    • COM 5.1 Use terminology that is appropriate for the intended audience
    • COM 5.1 Respond to questions in an appropriate manner

    Professional

    • P 1.2 Prepare for the event, reviewing all relevant materials, information, and media messages
    • P 1.1 Use non-verbal behaviours to convey respect, poise, professionalism, and credibility
    • P 1.2 Demonstrate an appreciation of the limits of one’s own expertise
    • P 3.1 Adhere to privacy, confidentiality, and legal requirements PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTP-4

    Developing a plan for continuing professional development

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on identifying and reflecting on opportunities for professional and leadership development based on gaps in knowledge and skills and/or personal interests or career plans. - This includes developing plans for addressing those learning needs as part of the first steps of ongoing lifelong learning, as well as planning for how to maintain wellness in practice. - The observation of this EPA is based on the resident’s submission of a professional development plan and discussion with a supervisor. - The plans should be SMART (specific, measurable, assessable, realistic, and timely), and must include the appropriate choice of clinical experiences and/or appropriate academic resources (journals, textbooks, conferences).

    Review of resident’s plan by supervisor Use Form 4 Collect 1 observation of achievement

    Suggested observations: 1

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.1 Demonstrate an awareness of what is required to practise in the setting of future practice

    Leader

    • L 4.2 Examine personal interests and career goals
    • L 4.2 Adjust educational experiences to gain competencies necessary for future practice

    Scholar

    • S 1.2 Interpret data on personal performance to identify opportunities for learning and improvement
    • S 1.1 Define learning needs related to personal practice and/or career goals
    • S 3.1 Generate focused questions that address practice uncertainty and knowledge gaps
    • S 1.1 Create a learning plan that is feasible, includes clear deliverables and a plan for monitoring ongoing achievement
    • S 1.1 Identify resources required to implement a personal learning plan PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Professional

    • P 2.1 Demonstrate a commitment to maintaining and enhancing competence PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTP-5

    Advancing the discipline through scholarly activity

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA includes all aspects of performing scholarly work: identification of a question for investigation, literature review, data gathering, data analysis, data synthesis, reflective critique and dissemination. - This may include scholarly research, quality assurance, or educational projects. - The assessment of this EPA is based on the submission of a completed scholarly project and may also include observation of the presentation of the scholarly work.

    Direct and/or indirect observation by supervisor Use Form 1 Collect 1 observation of achievement

    Suggested observations: 1

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Leader

    • L 4.1 Organize work to manage clinical, scholarly and other responsibilities

    Scholar

    • S 4.4 Identify, consult, and collaborate with others in the conduct of scholarly work
    • S 4.4 Generate focused questions for scholarly investigation
    • S 3.3 Critically evaluate the integrity, reliability, and applicability of public health- related research and literature
    • S 3.3 Develop a search strategy and execute a literature review
    • S 4.5 Summarize the findings of a literature review
    • S 4.4 Select appropriate methods
    • S 4.2 Apply the principles of research ethics and health equity considerations
    • S 4.4 Collect data
    • S 4.4 Perform analysis PUBLIC HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2025)
    • S 4.5 Summarize findings and the implications for practice
    • S 4.5 Prepare a work suitable for dissemination

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.