The story
Why this exists.
“My preceptor gave me the best feedback in person. None of it made it to the form.”
DebriefMD began with a resident in British Columbia, watching the same thing happen on every rotation: a preceptor gives rich, specific, immediately useful verbal feedback right after a case, and what does get written down rarely captures it.
What gets written down is the form: generic boxes, filled in days later from memory, with whichever trainee happened to come to mind that week. The actual feedback, the part that would have changed how the trainee practices tomorrow, lives in the hallway and then disappears.
The pattern was always the same, and it was always in one direction. Whatever ended up in writing was shorter than the conversation that produced it. Five minutes of specific, situated advice became two lines of “good clinical reasoning, keep reading around cases.” Nothing was falsified. It was just thinned, every time, until the record said much less than the teaching had.
That gap between what’s said and what’s documented is the whole reason this product exists. Every design decision comes back to it: we don’t ask clinicians to do more typing, we don’t ask residents to chase preceptors for paperwork, and we don’t let a rating stand in for the words that justify it. We just preserve the conversation, scrub what shouldn’t be there, and hand the resident a draft to review before any of it counts for anything.
We are taking on pilot programs now.
One program, its own form template, one rotation block, scoped with you before anything starts. Feedback from the residents and preceptors in a pilot cohort shapes every release.
Talk to us about a pilot