Pediatric Neurology
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada · 1.0 · 22 EPAs
Also available in French.
Every EPA in the published guide, shown as the form DebriefMD fills in, with its fields and answer options.
Transition to Discipline
TTD-1P
Performing a history and physical examination for patients with common neurological, medical and/or psychi…
Key features and assessment plan
- The focus of this EPA is the application of the clinical skills acquired in medical school in the new setting of neurology residency. - This includes eliciting the history and obtaining corroborating information from charts and/or caregivers, as well as performing a general physical examination and a neurological examination, including mental status, as relevant. - This EPA does not require developing management plans for the patient’s care.
Direct and/or indirect (corroborating information, chart review) observation by attending physician, fellow, or Core or TTP resident Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Observation type: direct; indirect - Event observed (select all that apply): history; physical exam; neurological exam - Presentation type (select all that apply): medical; neurological; psychiatric Collect 2 observations of achievement: - At least 1 direct observation of history taking (including indirect or direct observations of collecting corroborating information, as applicable) - At least 1 direct observation of physical or neurological exam - At least 1 patient with a neurological presentation - At least 2 observers - At least 1 faculty/attending observer
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Observation type
- direct
- indirect
Event observed
- history
- physical exam
- neurological exam
Presentation type
- medical
- neurological
- psychiatric
Medical Expert
- ME 2.2 Elicit an accurate relevant history
- ME 2.2 Perform a physical examination relevant to the presentation
Communicator
- COM 2.1 Conduct the interview in a patient-centred manner
- COM 2.3 Identify other sources of information (e.g., family, medical record) that may assist in a given patient’s care
Professional
- P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviours
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
TTD-2P
Recognizing the acuity of illness, initiating stabilization of patients, and obtaining help
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on recognizing that a patient is, or is likely to become, critically ill, and seeking assistance. - This includes prioritizing actions, initiating stabilizing activities, calling for help (as required) and documenting the encounter appropriately. - This EPA does not include diagnosing the cause of illness or providing ongoing management. - This EPA includes patients with a variety of medical and neurological presentations.
Direct observation or case review and review of documentation and/or discussion with interdisciplinary ward staff by faculty, attending physician, or Core or TTP resident Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Presentation: acute abdomen; confusion; chest pain; decreased level of consciousness; deterioration of neurological status (i.e., weakness, impending herniation); psychosis/mania; respiratory distress; seizure; shock; unstable vital signs; other presentation (write in) Collect 1 observation of achievement.
Suggested observations: 1
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Presentation
- acute abdomen
- confusion
- chest pain
- decreased level of consciousness
- deterioration of neurological status (i.e., weakness, impending herniation)
- psychosis/mania
- respiratory distress
- seizure
- shock
- unstable vital signs
- other presentation (write in)
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Recognize urgent problems that may need the involvement of more experienced colleagues and seek their assistance
- ME 2.2 Focus the clinical encounter, performing it in a time-effective manner, without excluding key elements
- ME 2.4 Apply emergency care protocols for patient emergencies
- ME 5.2 Use cognitive aids, such as pre-printed orders or care paths
Communicator
- COM 5.1 Prepare documentation that accurately conveys the encounter and outcome
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with physicians and other health care professionals
- COL 3.1 Identify patients requiring handover to other physicians or health care professionals
Leader
- L 2.1 Apply knowledge of local resources for optimal patient care
Professional
- P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviours
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
TTD-3P
Presenting findings of patient assessments
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on synthesizing assessment findings to provide comprehensive, concise, accurate, and well-organized case summaries to a supervisor.
Case review with supervising physician Use form 1. Collect 1 observation of achievement.
Suggested observations: 1
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 2.2 Synthesize and organize clinical information for clear and succinct presentation to supervisor
Communicator
- COM 2.1 Integrate and synthesize information about the patient’s beliefs, values, preferences, context and expectations with biomedical and psychosocial information
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
TTD-4P
Documenting patient encounters
Key features and assessment plan
- The focus of this EPA is documenting clinical assessments, including key history and physical examination findings, in an organized, accurate, and legible manner.
Review of document/note by faculty or senior resident Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Type of documentation: consult note; admission note; progress note; Collect 2 observations of achievement. - At least 1 consult or admission note - At least 1 progress note - At least 1 faculty observer
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Type of documentation
- consult note
- admission note
- progress note
Communicator
- COM 5.1 Document all relevant findings
- COM 5.1 Organize information in appropriate sections
- COM 5.1 Prepare documentation that accurately conveys the encounter and outcome
- COM 5.1 Complete clinical documentation in a timely manner
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
TTD-5P
Transferring clinical information between health care providers at handover
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on communicating acute and ongoing information between colleagues at transitional periods in care. - It includes verbal handover when going of fduty, at the end of a rotation, and/or at the end of call shifts.
Direct observation and/or review of sign-out sheet or other communication tool by faculty, or Core or TTP resident Collect 1 observation of achievement.
Suggested observations: 1
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 5.2 Use structured communication tools and strategies to enhance patient safety
Collaborator
- COL 3.2 Summarize and prioritize patient issues providing rationale for key decisions
- COL 3.2 Communicate plans for ongoing management of patients, such as outstanding investigations and anticipated events / outcomes
- COL 3.2 Communicate with the receiving physician(s) or health care professional(s) during transitions in care, clarifying issues as needed
- COL 1.3 Integrate the patient’s perspective and context into the care plan
Professional
- P 1.1 Demonstrate punctuality
- P 1.1 Complete assigned responsibilities
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
Foundations
F-1P
Assessing and initiating management for patients with neurological emergencies
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the recognition, timely assessment, and initial management of a variety of neurological emergencies. - It includes administering relevant scales (e.g., GCS, NIHSS), and selecting, ordering and interpreting appropriate neuroimaging and other investigations. - An important aspect of this EPA is the timely and appropriate recognition of the need for assistance and/or definitive management. - This EPA does not include performing procedures such as intubation, central line placement, or other invasive procedures. It also does not include making final decisions or arranging for definitive management.
Direct observation and/or case review by faculty, fellows, or Core or TTP trainee Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Presentation: acute stroke; status epilepticus; neuromuscular respiratory failure; suspected spinal cord compression; meningitis/encephalitis; impending herniation; reduced level of consciousness/coma; thunderclap headache; other - If other presentation (write in): Collect 3 observations of achievement. - At least 1 status epilepticus - At least 1 meningitis or encephalitis - At least 2 faculty observers
Suggested observations: 3
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Presentation
- acute stroke
- status epilepticus
- neuromuscular respiratory failure
- suspected spinal cord compression
- meningitis/encephalitis
- impending herniation
- reduced level of consciousness/coma
- thunderclap headache
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 2.1 Recognize instability and medical acuity in a clinical presentation
- ME 2.2 Perform a history and physical exam relevant to the patient presentation, in a time-effective manner
- ME 2.2 Select and/or interpret appropriate investigations
- ME 2.2 Administer relevant scales (e.g., GCS, NIHSS)
- ME 2.4 Develop and implement a plan for initial management
Collaborator
- COL 2.1 Show respect towards other members of the health care team
Professional
- P 1.1 Work within personal limitations, asking for assistance as needed
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-2P
Assessing patients with common neurological presentations
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on performing and documenting a history and physical exam, and localizing a neurological problem. - Examples of common presentations may include weakness, sensory changes or abnormal movements.
Direct observation by attending physician, Core or TTP Neurology resident, or fellow Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Event observed: history; physical - Presentation: abnormal movements; altered mental status; dizziness/balance problems; headache/pain; paroxysmal event; sensory disturbance; visual disturbance; weakness; other - If other presentation (write in): - Age (write in): Collect 3 observations of achievement. - At least 1 history - At least 2 physical - At least 2 different presentations - At least 2 attending staff
Suggested observations: 3
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Event observed
- history
- physical
Presentation
- abnormal movements
- altered mental status
- dizziness/balance problems
- headache/pain
- paroxysmal event
- sensory disturbance
- visual disturbance
- weakness
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 2.2 Elicit an accurate, relevant history
- ME 2.2 Perform a physical examination relevant to the presentation
- ME 2.2 Synthesize clinical information to localize the neurological problem
Communicator
- COM 2.1 Conduct the interview in a patient-centred manner
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-3P
Diagnosing and managing patients with common neurological presentations
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on localizing a neurological problem, providing a differential diagnosis, and developing a management plan. - It may include using ancillary sources (e.g., collateral history, investigations, charts) to synthesize information. - It includes ordering a first line of treatment and consulting other health professionals, as appropriate.
Direct observation and/or case review by attending Neurology physician, fellow, or Core or TTP Neurology resident Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Presentation: abnormal movements; altered mental status; dizziness/balance problems; headache/pain; paroxysmal event; sensory disturbance; visual disturbance; weakness; other - If other presentation (write in): Collect 4 observations of achievement. - At least 2 observation by staff neurologist - At least 4 different presentations
Suggested observations: 4
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Presentation
- abnormal movements
- altered mental status
- dizziness/balance problems
- headache/pain
- paroxysmal event
- sensory disturbance
- visual disturbance
- weakness
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 2.2 Interpret the results of investigations in the context of the patient’s presentation
- ME 2.2 Synthesize clinical information to localize a neurological problem
- ME 2.2 Develop a differential diagnosis
- ME 2.4 Develop and implement a plan for initial management
- ME 4.1 Determine the need and urgency of referral to other health care professionals
- ME 2.4 Determine the appropriate disposition and/or setting for ongoing care
- ME 1.6 Seek assistance in situations that are complex or new
Communicator
- COM 2.3 Identify other sources of information (e.g. family, medical record) that may assist in the given patient’s care
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-4P
Assessing and providing initial management for patients with non-neurological presentations
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the initial management of outpatients and inpatients presenting with a variety of common medical and/or psychiatric issues and complications. - This includes providing initial assessment and treatment, and seeking consultation for definitive management as needed.
Direct observation and/or case review by attending physician, Core or TTP resident, or fellow Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Setting: inpatient; outpatient - Domain: cardiology; critical care; dermatology; endocrinology; gastrointestinal; genetics/metabolics; hematology; infectious disease; neonatology; neurosurgery; oncology; psychiatry; respirology; rheumatology; other - If other domain (write in): Collect 3 observations of achievement. - At least 3 different domains - At least 1 psychiatric presentation - At least 2 attending staff with appropriate area of expertise
Suggested observations: 3
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Setting
- inpatient
- outpatient
Domain
- cardiology
- critical care
- dermatology
- endocrinology
- gastrointestinal
- genetics/metabolics
- hematology
- infectious disease
- neonatology
- neurosurgery
- oncology
- psychiatry
- respirology
- rheumatology
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 2.2 Perform a focused clinical assessment
- ME 2.2 Select and/or interpret appropriate investigations
- ME 2.2 Synthesize patient information to determine diagnosis
- ME 2.4 Develop and implement a plan for initial management
- ME 4.1 Ensure follow-up on results of investigation and response to treatment
Communicator
- COM 3.1 Provide timely, accurate information and explanations to the patient and/or family
Collaborator
- COL 1.2 Consult as needed with other health care professionals, including other physicians
- COL 2.1 Show respect towards other members of the health care team
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-5P
Performing lumbar punctures
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the safe performance of lumbar puncture, including measurement of opening pressure when indicated. - This EPA includes obtaining informed consent, documenting the procedure, as well as planning post-procedural care. - This EPA must be achieved in simple and complex contexts. Examples of complex contexts include: acute setting, body habitus, spinal deformity, lack of cooperation, and sedation.
Direct observation and/or review of procedure note by attending physician, registered nurse practitioner, or Core or TTP resident Use form 2. Form collects information on: - Complexity: simple; complex - Age: neonate; child; adolescent/adult Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 1 complex - At least 1 in each age group - At least 1 staff physician observer
Suggested observations: 3
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Complexity
- simple
- complex
Age
- neonate
- child
- adolescent/adult
Medical Expert
- ME 3.2 Obtain and document informed consent, explaining the risks and rationale for a proposed procedure
- ME 3.4 Gather and/or manage the availability of appropriate instruments and materials
- ME 3.4 Set up and position the patient for a lumbar puncture
- ME 3.4 Maintain universal precautions
- ME 3.4 Prepare and cleanse the procedural site
- ME 3.4 Perform lumbar puncture in a skilful and safe manner, adapting to unanticipated findings or changing clinical circumstances
- ME 3.4 Establish and implement a plan for post-procedure care
- ME 3.4 Recognize and manage complications
Communicator
- COM 5.1 Document the encounter to convey the procedure and outcome
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-6P
Identifying and documenting goals of care
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the application of communication skills to identify and document the patient's goals of care, including resuscitation status, limits of care, and advanced directives. - This EPA includes discussions with a patient and/or substitute decision maker. - This EPA may be observed in the clinical setting or in simulation (e.g., OSCE).
Direct observation by attending physician Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Context: patient-directed; substitute decision maker Collect 1 observation of achievement.
Suggested observations: 1
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Context
- patient-directed
- substitute decision maker
Medical Expert
- ME 2.3 Recognize and respond to signs that it is time to transition care away from a disease modifying approach
- ME 3.2 Determine the capacity of the patient to give consent and where appropriate establish the appropriate substitute decision maker
- ME 2.3 Establish goals of care in collaboration with the patient and/or family
Communicator
- COM 3.1 Convey information about diagnosis and prognosis clearly and compassionately
- COM 3.1 Use appropriate language and avoid medical jargon
- COM 3.1 Use strategies to verify and validate the patient’s and/or family’s understanding
- COM 2.1 Gather information about the patient’s beliefs, values, preferences, context and expectations with regards to their care
- COM 1.5 Recognize when strong emotions (e.g. fear, anger, anxiety, sorrow) are impacting an interaction and respond appropriately
- COM 5.1 Document the encounter to reflect the discussion and decision(s)
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
Core
C-1P
Assessing and managing patients with acute neurological illness
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on diagnosis and comprehensive management of patients in any acute care setting, such as the emergency department, intensive care unit or inpatient ward. - This includes performing the clinical assessment, localizing the lesion, developing and prioritizing a differential diagnosis, ordering and interpreting investigations, and treating the patient.
Direct observation, case review and/or review of documents by attending neurology physician, neurology fellow or TTP resident Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Case mix: acute stroke; seizures; acute neuromuscular weakness; myelitis; increased intracranial pressure; CNS infection; acute demyelination; encephalopathy/coma; other - If other diagnosis (write in): - Age (write in): Collect 6 observations of achievement - At least 1 childhood suspected stroke - At least 1 seizure - At least 1 acute neuromuscular weakness - At least 2 other presentations - At least 1 adult presentation - At least 3 observations by attending physician
Suggested observations: 6
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Case mix
- acute stroke
- seizures
- acute neuromuscular weakness
- myelitis
- increased intracranial pressure
- CNS infection
- acute demyelination
- encephalopathy/coma
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Perform clinical assessments that address all relevant issues
- ME 2.2 Synthesize clinical information to localize the neurological problem
- ME 2.2 Develop a differential diagnosis
- ME 2.2 Select and/or interpret appropriate investigations
- ME 3.3 Balance risk, effectiveness and priority of interventions in the presence of multiple co-morbidities and/or other features of case complexity
- ME 2.4 Develop and implement a management plan that considers all of the patient’s health problems and needs
- ME 4.1 Determine the need and urgency of referral to other health care professionals
Communicator
- COM 4.3 Use communication skills and strategies that help the patient and/or family make informed decisions
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Integrate the patient’s perspective and context into the care plan
- COL 1.3 Work effectively with other health care professionals to plan and provide care for individual patients
Scholar
- S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise into decision-making
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-2P
Providing ongoing care for patients with chronic neurological diseases
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the full breadth of care for patients with chronic neurologic conditions. - This includes managing disease related symptoms, assessing response to treatment and clinical status, addressing goals of care, providing follow-up and end of life care, and accessing community resources.
Direct observation and/or case review by staff neurologist Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Age: neonate; infant; child; adolescent; adult - Case mix (select all that apply): cognitive/neurodegenerative; demyelinating / inflammatory; developmental; epilepsy; functional; headache; inborn errors of metabolism; movement disorder; neuromuscular; neuro-ophthalmology; neuro- oncology; vascular; traumatic brain injury; neuro-otology; neuro-infectious disease; neurologic complications of pregnancy / delivery; sleep; systemic disease; other - If other issue (write in): - Settings: outpatient; inpatient; ED; LTC - Complex: yes; no Collect 6 observations of achievement. - At least 1 from each pediatric age category - At least 6 different examples of the case mix - At least 3 complex - At least 5 observations from staff physicians - At least 3 different assessors
Suggested observations: 6
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Age
- neonate
- infant
- child
- adolescent
- adult
Case mix
- cognitive/neurodegenerative
- demyelinating / inflammatory
- developmental
- epilepsy
- functional
- headache
- inborn errors of metabolism
- movement disorder
- neuromuscular
- neuro-ophthalmology
- neuro- oncology
- vascular
- traumatic brain injury
- neuro-otology
- neuro-infectious disease
- neurologic complications of pregnancy / delivery
- sleep
- systemic disease
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 2.2 Gather clinical information to assess health status and symptoms
- ME 2.2 Assess the patient’s clinical course and anticipate future health needs
- ME 2.4 Apply strategies for disease prevention and health promotion
- ME 4.1 Prevent and/or manage complications of neurological disease
- ME 2.4 Manage common medical co-morbidities in patients with chronic neurological disease
- ME 2.4 Manage common issues (physical symptoms and psycho-social) in patients with chronic neurological disease
- ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of clinical pharmacology as it pertains to drug prescribing in neurological disease
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Integrate the patient’s perspective and context into the care plan
- COL 1.3 Engage in respectful shared decision-making with other physicians and/or health care professionals
Health Advocate
- HA 1.1 Work with patients to address the determinants of health that affect them and their access to needed health services or resources
- HA 1.2 Work with the patient to increase their understanding of their illness and health care needs
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-3P
Providing comprehensive management for patients with neurological emergencies
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA builds on the skills of Foundations to add the skills of interpreting investigations, making decisions regarding intervention and selecting appropriate interventions. - It also includes communicating with families regarding diagnosis, prognosis and plan, and obtaining informed consent, as appropriate. - This may also include consultation with other services and prioritization/triage of patient management. - Patient presentations relevant to this EPA include acute stroke, neuromuscular respiratory failure, status epilepticus, spinal cord compression, meningitis/encephalitis, herniation syndromes, and/or reduced level of consciousness/coma.
Direct observation and/or case review by attending physician, registered nurse, or TTP resident Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Presentations: acute stroke; impending herniation; reduced level of consciousness/coma; neuromuscular respiratory distress; suspected meningitis/encephalitis; suspected spinal cord compression; suspected status epilepticus; thunderclap headache; other - If other presentation (write in): - Complexity: simple; complex Complete 4 observations of achievement. - At least 2 cases of refractory status epilepticus - At least 1 possible stroke - At least 2 different observers - At least 1 staff observer
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Presentations
- acute stroke
- impending herniation
- reduced level of consciousness/coma
- neuromuscular respiratory distress
- suspected meningitis/encephalitis
- suspected spinal cord compression
- suspected status epilepticus
- thunderclap headache
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 2.2 Focus the clinical encounter, performing it in a time-effective manner, without excluding key elements
- ME 2.2 Select and/or interpret appropriate investigations
- ME 3.3 Prioritize a procedure or therapy, taking into account clinical urgency, potential for deterioration, and available resources
- ME 2.4 Develop and implement a management plan that considers all of the patient’s health problems and needs
- ME 3.2 Obtain informed consent
- ME 4.1 Determine the appropriate disposition and/or setting for ongoing care
Communicator
- COM 3.1 Convey information about diagnosis and prognosis clearly and compassionately
Collaborator
- COL 1.2 Consult as needed with other health care professionals, including other physicians
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-4P
Performing specialized neurological examination techniques and procedures
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the performance of focused neurological examinations and specialized techniques. - This EPA may be observed in simulation.
Direct observation by attending physician or TTP resident Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Setting: inpatient; outpatient; simulation; ED; LTC - Exam technique: movement disorder exam; neuro-muscular exam; neuro- ophthalmological exam; cognitive/developmental exam; functional exam; examination of the comatose patient; Epley maneuver; Dix-Hallpike test; HINTS; neonatal exam; other (enter text) - Complex: yes; no - Age: adult; neonate; infant; child; adolescent Collect 10 observations of achievement - At least 1 of each exam technique - At least 1 neonatal exam - At least 1 developmental assessment
Suggested observations: 10
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Setting
- inpatient
- outpatient
- simulation
- ED
- LTC
Exam technique
- movement disorder exam
- neuro-muscular exam
- neuro- ophthalmological exam
- cognitive/developmental exam
- functional exam
- examination of the comatose patient
- Epley maneuver
- Dix-Hallpike test
- HINTS
- neonatal exam
- other (enter text)
Complex
- yes
- no
Age
- adult
- neonate
- infant
- child
- adolescent
Medical Expert
- ME 3.2 Explain the risks and benefits of, and the rationale for a proposed examination, procedure or therapy
- ME 2.2 Perform specialized examination techniques in a skilful manner
- ME 3.4 Perform examination in a skilful and safe manner, adapting to unanticipated findings or changing clinical circumstances
- ME 2.2 Recognize and correctly interpret the findings of special clinical maneuvers and procedures
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-5P
Documenting clinical encounters
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the application of written communication skills in a variety of formats: discharge summaries; consultations; progress notes. - This includes a synthesis of the pertinent clinical findings, investigations and management plan, as well as clear articulation of the role of the neurologist and the referring physician in further care. It may include linking the recommendations to evidence based guidelines or other educational references for the referring physician. - The documents submitted for review must be the sole work of the resident. - This EPA may be observed in any care setting and any patient presentation.
Review of clinical documentation by attending physician Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Type of document: new assessment consultation note; follow-up consultation note; discharge summary; letter to referring physician - Setting: outpatient; inpatient; ED - Complex: yes; no Collect 2 observations of achievement. - At least 1 new letter to referring physician - At least 1 complex - At least 2 different assessors
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Type of document
- new assessment consultation note
- follow-up consultation note
- discharge summary
- letter to referring physician
Setting
- outpatient
- inpatient
- ED
Complex
- yes
- no
Communicator
- COM 5.1 Organize information in appropriate sections
- COM 5.1 Document all relevant findings and investigations
- COM 5.1 Convey clinical reasoning and the rationale for decisions
- COM 5.1 Provide a clear plan for ongoing management
- COM 5.1 Complete clinical documentation in a timely manner
Collaborator
- COL 1.2 Identify the roles of the referring physician and the neurology consultant in the ongoing management plan
- COL 3.2 Provide anticipatory guidance for results of outstanding investigations and/or next steps for management
- COL 2.1 Convey information thoughtfully and respectfully
Scholar
- S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise into decision-making
- S 1.3 Provide teaching points to improve quality of care
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-6P
Managing the team caring for patients admitted with neurological problems
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on clinical management of inpatients. This could include either consulting or inpatient neurology services. - This includes leadership and management of a team of junior residents and medical students, and collaboration with the interprofessional team. - It also includes educating junior learners. - This EPA does not include planning and implementing transitions of care (such as handover, discharge planning). - The observation of this EPA is based on regular interaction over at least one week, and includes feedback from team members
Direct and/or indirect observation by attending physician, with input from other members of the health professional team Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Site of observation (select all that apply): interprofessional team meeting; family meeting; teaching session; rounds session; other - If other site of observation (write in): - Includes input from (select all that apply): attending staff ; nurse; clinical assistant; consulting physician; occupational therapist; physiotherapist; speech language pathologist; social worker; other trainee (e.g. fellow; junior resident; medical student); other team member Collect 2 observations of achievement. - At least 2 different attending staff - Includes feedback from at least 3 other health professionals
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Site of observation
- interprofessional team meeting
- family meeting
- teaching session
- rounds session
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 1.1 Demonstrate responsibility and accountability for decisions regarding patient care, acting in the role of most responsible physician
Collaborator
- COL 1.2 Work effectively with the interprofessional team
Leader
- L 2.1 Allocate health care resources for optimal patient care
- L 4.1 Set priorities and manage time to fulfil diverse responsibilities
- L 4.1 Integrate supervisory and teaching responsibilities into the overall management of the clinical service
Scholar
- S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise into decision-making
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-7P
Planning and implementing transitions of care
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on ensuring safe transition of patient care between different clinical settings (e.g., between inpatient settings, from inpatient to outpatient, from outpatient to inpatient, from pediatric to adult clinic, etc.). - It includes working with the patient and family to assess and address their needs, making medical decisions, applying knowledge of available resources and facilitating access to those resources and services. - It also includes summarizing the patient’s medical issues, anticipating the evolution of the patient’s clinical status and providing direction and anticipatory guidance to other health care professionals.
Direct observation and/or case or documentation (e.g. discharge summary) review by attending physician, TTP resident, fellow, registered nurse, or other health professional Use form 1. Form collects information on - Complex: yes; no - Transition to adult care: yes; no Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 1 complex case - At least 1 transition to adult care - At least 2 different observers - At least 1 staff observer
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Complex
- yes
- no
Transition to adult care
- yes
- no
Medical Expert
- ME 2.2 Assess patient/caregiver health literacy and developmental readiness for the demands of the adult care setting
- ME 2.2 Assess psychosocial issues that may affect health and/or access to services
- ME 2.2 Assess adherence to treatment and monitoring plans
- ME 2.4 Anticipate, prevent and manage changes in health status at the time of transition
- ME 4.1 Establish plans for ongoing care that include monitoring health status and managing adherence
Communicator
- COM 1.6 Tailor approaches to decision-making to patient capacity, values and preferences
- COM 3.1 Provide information to patients and families clearly and compassionately
- COM 4.3 Address questions from the patient and family about next steps
Collaborator
- COL 1.2 Consult as needed with other health care professionals, including other physicians
- COL 3.2 Convey relevant information to the most appropriate physician
Health Advocate
- HA 1.1 Facilitate timely patient access to services and resources
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-8P
Leading discussions in complicated situations
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the application of advanced communication and conflict resolution skills to address difficult situations that may involve patients, families, and/or members of the health care team. - This EPA may be observed in any scenario that is emotionally charged. These communications can include, but are not limited to, managing conflict, disclosing unexpected complications and/or medical errors, addressing non-adherence with treatment plan, breaking bad news, and establishing goals of care.
Direct observation by attending physician Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Issue (select all that apply): acute neurological emergency; breaking bad news; goals of care; end of life; managing conflict; non-adherence; abuse; other - Other issue (write in): Collect 3 observations of achievement. - At least 1 goals of care discussion - At least 1 breaking bad news - At least 1 conversation in the setting of acute neurological emergency
Suggested observations: 3
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Issue
- acute neurological emergency
- breaking bad news
- goals of care
- end of life
- managing conflict
- non-adherence
- abuse
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 2.3 Establish goals of care in collaboration with the patient and/or family
Communicator
- COM 1.1 Develop trusting and supportive relationships with patients and families
- COM 3.1 Convey information about medical course and/or management plan clearly and accurately
- COM 3.1 Use appropriate language and avoid medical jargon
- COM 3.1 Use strategies to verify and validate the patient’s and/or family’s understanding
- COM 1.5 Recognize when strong emotions (e.g. fear, anger, anxiety, sorrow) are impacting an interaction and respond appropriately
- COM 4.3 Use communication skills and strategies that help the patient and/or family make informed decisions
- COM 4.3 Answer questions regarding care delivery, treatment decisions and/or prognosis
- COM 4.1 Communicate in a manner that is respectful, non-judgmental and culturally aware
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
Transition to Practice
TTP-1P
Leading a neurological inpatient or consultation service
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the independent management of an inpatient service in the role of the physician most responsible for patient’s neurological care. Building on the competencies of the Core stage, this includes application of the knowledge, skills and attitudes expected of an independently practicing physician. - This role involves 4 components: overall care of acute and chronic patients; working effectively with the interprofessional team; administrative responsibilities; and coaching, assessment and feedback of junior learners - The observation of this EPA is divided into two parts: patient care; interprofessional interaction/supervision - The patient care aspects of this EPA are based on at least one week of observation
Part A: Patient care Direct and indirect observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on - Complexity and volume of case load: low; high Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 1 case load of high complexity - 2 different supervisors Part B: Interprofessional care/supervision Feedback from multiple observers compiled by supervising neurologist Use Form 3. Form collects information on: - Includes feedback from (select all that apply): nurse; clinical assistant; consulting physician; occupational therapist; physiotherapist; speech language pathologist; social worker; other trainee (e.g. fellow; junior resident; medical student); other health care professional Collect feedback from at least 3 observers on one occasion during Transition to Practice
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Complexity and volume of case load
- low
- high
Medical Expert
- Part A: ME 1.1 Demonstrate responsibility and accountability for decisions regarding patient care, acting in the role of most responsible physician
- Part A: ME 1.4 Perform relevant and time-effective clinical assessments
- Part A: ME 1.5 Prioritize patients based on the urgency of clinical presentations
- Part A: ME 2.4 Develop plans for patient care that anticipate clinical response and progress to other settings of care, including home
- Part A: ME 4.1 Coordinate treatment and follow-up across care settings
Collaborator
- Part B: COL 1.2 Make effective use of the scope and expertise of other health care professionals
- Part B: COL 1.2 Assign tasks and responsibilities to other team members, commensurate with their skills and patient complexity
- Part B: COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with physicians and other health care professionals
- Part B: COL 1.1 Respond appropriately to input from other health care professionals
Leader
- Part A: L 2.1 Allocate health care resources for optimal patient care
- Part A: L 4.1 Set priorities and manage time to fulfil diverse responsibilities
- Part A: L 4.1 Integrate supervisory and teaching responsibilities into the overall management of the clinical service
Health Advocate
- Part A: HA 1.1 Facilitate timely patient access to services and resources
Scholar
- Part A: S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise into decision-making
- Part B: S 2.1 Use strategies for deliberate, positive role-modelling
- Part B: S 2.2 Create a positive learning environment
- Part B: S 2.5 Provide feedback to enhance learning and performance
Professional
- Part A: P 4.1 Manage the mental and physical challenges that impact physician wellness and/or performance in demanding or stressful clinical settings
- Part B: P 1.1 Respond punctually to requests from patients or other health care professionals
- Part B: P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviors
- Part B: P 1.1 Intervene when behaviours toward colleagues and/or learners undermine a respectful environment
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
TTP-2P
Managing an outpatient neurological practice
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the management of clinical and related administrative responsibilities for individual patients in the outpatient setting. - This includes: completing medical documentation in a timely manner; completing administrative responsibilities which may include billing, triaging, insurance forms, phone calls, and clinic scheduling in a timely manner; reviewing test results/acting on results appropriately and in timely manner; and working effectively with the staff and/or other learners in the clinic. - This EPA may be observed in any clinic experience where supervisors have the opportunity for longitudinal observation of the resident. - The observation of this EPA must be based on a period of at least 3 months.
Direct and indirect observation by attending physician, with input from administrative staff , clinic nurses, and/or other health professionals Use form 1. Collect 2 observations of achievement.
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 5.2 Use systems to track and follow-up on clinical data, such as studies and laboratory tests
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Address the questions and concerns of the referring/primary care physician when acting in the consultant role
- COL 1.3 Provide accurate, timely and relevant written information to the referring/primary care physician
Leader
- L 4.1 Manage time effectively in the outpatient clinic
- L 4.1 Review and act on test results in a timely manner
- L 4.2 Manage a practice effectively including activities such as billing and communicating with third-party providers
Professional
- P 1.1 Respond punctually to requests from patients or other health care providers
- P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviors
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
TTP-3P
Providing consultation for and managing patients at outlying centers
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on being accessible to health care professionals (HCP) and patients in an outside centre to provide advice about diagnosis, management and/or patient disposition. - This includes gathering information to make a clinical assessment, assessing resources and options available in that setting, providing guidance for management and making decisions regarding triaging patients to outpatient clinics, inpatient wards or the ICU. - It also includes recognizing conditions that can be managed remotely versus those that require in-person assessment.
Direct observation by supervising neurologist with, if possible, input from the referring health care professional Use form 1. Collect 2 observations of achievement. - At least 2 different observers
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 2.2 Interpret clinical information gathered by another health professional, along with the results of investigations, for the purposes of diagnosis and management
- ME 2.4 Determine the setting of care appropriate for the patient’s health needs
- ME 2.4 Establish a plan for ongoing care in the local setting and/or for care prior to and during transfer
Communicator
- COM 2.3 Request and synthesize patient information gathered by another health professional
- COM 5.1 Document advice provided to off-site health care providers
Collaborator
- COL 3.1 Determine when a patient should be transferred to ensure optimal patient care
- COL 3.2 Recognize and act on patient safety issues in the transfer of care
- COL 1.2 Negotiate overlapping and shared responsibilities with physicians and other colleagues in the health care professions
Leader
- L 2.1 Apply knowledge of the health care resources available in other care settings
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.