Pain Medicine
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada · 1.0 · 23 EPAs
Also available in French.
Every EPA in the published guide, shown as the form DebriefMD fills in, with its fields and answer options.
Transition to Discipline
TTD-1
Assessing patients with uncomplicated pain not due to cancer
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA includes using a biopsychosocial approach to obtain a comprehensive history of pain and related domains and perform a comprehensive physical examination relevant to the patient presentation with appropriate elements of neuro and MSK examinations. - It also includes establishing a differential diagnosis and synthesizing patient information for presentation to a supervisor. - This EPA may be observed in the context of a new patient consultation or assessment of new pain during follow-up.
Direct observation and/or case review by supervisor Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Physical exam observed: no; yes - Presentation: abdominal pain; CRPS; fibromyalgia; headache; low back pain; neck pain; other Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 direct observations of physical examination - At least 2 different presentations
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Physical exam observed
- no
- yes
Presentation
- abdominal pain
- CRPS
- fibromyalgia
- headache
- low back pain
- neck pain
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 2.2 Gather a relevant clinical history
- ME 2.2 Gather information about the patient’s social circumstances and supports
- ME 2.2 Perform a physical exam relevant to the presentation
- ME 2.2 Organize clinical information for clear and succinct presentation to a supervisor
Communicator
- COM 1.2 Optimize the physical environment for patient comfort, dignity, and privacy
- COM 1.1 Establish rapport with the patient and family
- COM 2.1 Use patient-centred interviewing skills and inclusive, person-first language
- COM 2.3 Seek and synthesize relevant information from other sources (e.g., family, medical record)
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
TTD-2
Developing management plans for patients with uncomplicated pain not due to cancer
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on establishing a plan for further investigation and management based on the findings of the clinical assessment. - This includes applying a biopsychosocial approach to investigation and management.
Direct observation and case review with supervisor Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Presentation: abdominal pain; CRPS; fibromyalgia; headache; low back pain; neck pain; other - Chronic pain: no; yes Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 different presentations - At least 2 different assessors
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Presentation
- abdominal pain
- CRPS
- fibromyalgia
- headache
- low back pain
- neck pain
- other
Chronic pain
- no
- yes
Medical Expert
- ME 2.2 Synthesize and interpret information from the clinical assessment
- ME 2.2 Develop a differential diagnosis relevant to the patient’s presentation
- ME 2.2 Select and/or interpret investigations
- ME 4.1 Determine the need and timing of referral to another health care professional
- ME 2.4 Propose a management plan, which may include non-pharmacologic, pharmacologic and/or interventional strategies
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
TTD-3
Recognizing clinically urgent or emergent situations and initiating management
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the recognition, assessment, and initial management of patients with medical or psychiatric emergencies related to their pain, its etiology, or treatment, and includes basic resuscitation and arranging for follow-up and/or investigation as relevant. - Examples of clinically urgent or emergent situations include cauda equina syndrome, myelopathy, suicidality, opioid overdose or withdrawal, vasovagal episode, local anesthetic toxicity, and post-procedural complications. - This EPA may be observed in a simulation or clinical setting.
Direct observation or case review by supervisor Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Case mix: acute cardiovascular event; anaphylaxis; cardiorespiratory arrest; local anesthetic toxicity; low back pain red flags; motor block after procedure; opioid overdose; opioid withdrawal; psychiatric emergency; vasovagal episode - Settings: pain clinic; simulation; other Collect 2 observations of achievement
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Case mix
- acute cardiovascular event
- anaphylaxis
- cardiorespiratory arrest
- local anesthetic toxicity
- low back pain red flags
- motor block after procedure
- opioid overdose
- opioid withdrawal
- psychiatric emergency
- vasovagal episode
Settings
- pain clinic
- simulation
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 2.1 Determine the acuity of the issue and the priorities for patient care
- ME 2.2 Focus the clinical assessment, performing it in a time-effective manner without excluding key elements
- ME 2.2 Develop a differential diagnosis relevant to the patient’s presentation
- ME 2.2 Select and/or interpret investigations
- ME 2.4 Develop and implement a plan for initial management
- ME 1.4 Recognize urgent problems that may need the involvement of more experienced colleagues and seek their assistance
Collaborator
- COL 3.1 Identify patients requiring handover to other physicians or health care professionals
- COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with other health care professionals involved in the patient’s care
Leader
- L 2.1 Apply knowledge of local resources
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
TTD-4
Documenting assessments and recommendations
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the application of written communication skills to clearly convey recommendations regarding investigation and/or management to another health care professional. - This includes a synthesis of the pertinent clinical findings, investigations, and management plan and the clinical reasoning for those recommendations. - The documents submitted for review must be the sole work of the resident.
Review of resident’s documentation by supervisor Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Case mix: new consultation; follow-up Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 1 new consultation - At least 1 follow-up note - At least 2 different assessors
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Case mix
- new consultation
- follow-up
Medical Expert
- ME 2.2 Synthesize and interpret information from the clinical assessment
Communicator
- COM 5.1 Document all relevant findings and investigations
- COM 5.1 Provide a clear plan for ongoing management
- COM 5.1 Convey clinical reasoning and the rationale for decisions
- COM 5.1 Organize information in appropriate sections
- COM 5.1 Complete clinical documentation in a timely manner
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
Foundations
F-1
Providing initial consultations
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on providing a comprehensive clinical assessment and proposing a management plan that may include non-pharmacologic, pharmacologic and/or interventional strategies. - This includes administering and interpreting validated assessment tools when relevant, integrating investigations (e.g., imaging), and developing a comprehensive differential diagnosis. - It may include referral to and/or co-management with other specialists (e.g., orthopedics, addiction medicine, rheumatology).
Direct observation and/or case review by supervisor Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Observation: direct; case review - Presentation: abdominal pain; CRPS; fibromyalgia; headache; low back pain; neck pain - Complexity: simple; moderate; high Collect 4 observations of achievement - At least 3 direct observations - A variety of presentations - At least 3 of moderate or high complexity - At least 3 different assessors
Suggested observations: 4
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Observation
- direct
- case review
Presentation
- abdominal pain
- CRPS
- fibromyalgia
- headache
- low back pain
- neck pain
Complexity
- simple
- moderate
- high
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Apply a biopsychosocial approach to the clinical assessment
- ME 2.2 Elicit a history and perform a physical exam
- ME 2.2 Select, administer, and interpret validated assessment tools
- ME 2.2 Select and/or interpret investigations
- ME 2.2 Develop a differential diagnosis and identify the most likely diagnosis
- ME 2.4 Propose a plan which may include further investigation and/or non- pharmacologic, pharmacologic and/or interventional strategies
- ME 4.1 Determine the need and timing of referral to another health care professional
Communicator
- COM 2.3 Seek and synthesize relevant information from other sources (e.g., family, medical record)
- COM 4.3 Engage the patient in goal setting and shared decision-making regarding management
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-2
Providing follow-up care
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on clinical reassessment of the patient and integration of the results of investigations and outcomes of the pain management plan to monitor and refine ongoing management. - This includes gathering a comprehensive interval history and assessing, monitoring, and documenting the patient’s response to treatment, reassessing the differential diagnosis, and adjusting treatment strategies and interventions as needed, as well as communicating with the referring physician and interprofessional team.
Direct observation and/or case review by supervisor Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Observation: direct; case review - Presentation: abdominal pain; CRPS; fibromyalgia; headache; low back pain; neck pain - Complexity: simple; moderate; high Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 2 direct observations - A variety of presentations - At least 2 of moderate or high complexity - At least 2 different assessors
Suggested observations: 3
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Observation
- direct
- case review
Presentation
- abdominal pain
- CRPS
- fibromyalgia
- headache
- low back pain
- neck pain
Complexity
- simple
- moderate
- high
Medical Expert
- ME 2.2 Elicit an interval history and perform a focused physical exam
- ME 2.2 Interpret the results of investigations performed to investigate and/or monitor the condition and/or treatment
- ME 2.2 Adjust the differential diagnosis as new information is obtained
- ME 2.2 Select, administer, and interpret validated assessment tools
- ME 2.2 Assess response to treatment as well as adverse effects, changes in condition, and/or goals of care
- ME 2.4 Adjust the existing management plan, which may include further investigation and/or non-pharmacologic, pharmacologic, and/or interventional strategies
- ME 4.1 Determine the frequency and timing of future investigations and visits
Communicator
- COM 4.2 Facilitate self-care and chronic disease management
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with other health care professionals involved in the patient’s care
Health Advocate
- HA 1.2 Work with the patient to increase their understanding of their condition and health care needs
Scholar
- S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-3
Providing pharmacologic management for patients with common pain syndromes
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on integrating the principles and skills of analgesic pharmacology (e.g., dosing, interval, titration, usage). - It includes initiating, monitoring, and managing pharmacologic treatments, applying guidelines for pain management (e.g., for neuropathic pain, for use of opioids, cannabinoids, opioid agonists, and other controlled substances) and following regulatory frameworks for prescribing.
Direct observation, case discussion and/or review of clinical documentation (consult letter, prescription) by supervisor, pharmacist, or nurse practitioner Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Presentation: acute post-surgical; cancer pain; headache; neuropathic; nociceptive (somatic or visceral); nociplastic (fibro); simple MSK Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 1 patient with neuropathic pain - At least 1 patient with nociceptive pain - At least 3 different assessors
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Presentation
- acute post-surgical
- cancer pain
- headache
- neuropathic
- nociceptive (somatic or visceral)
- nociplastic (fibro)
- simple MSK
Medical Expert
- ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of guidelines for pharmacologic management of pain
- ME 2.2 Perform a risk assessment if opioids or cannabinoids are being considered
- ME 2.2 Identify significant drug interactions
- ME 2.4 Develop a pharmacologic management plan
- ME 2.4 Select and prescribe the appropriate dose and regimen
- ME 2.4 Select and prescribe appropriate monitoring strategies
Communicator
- COM 5.1 Document the encounter to convey clinical reasoning and the rationale for decisions
Professional
- P 3.1 Adhere to regulations governing the prescribing of controlled substances
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-4
Sharing management plans with patients and their families
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the application of communication skills and strategies to convey information about diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment options, and to engage the patient and family in shared decision-making. - This includes describing the role of the interprofessional team in the pain management plan and emphasizing the importance of active self-management/care, exercise therapy, and pain education.
Direct observation by supervisor, which may include input from other members of the interprofessional team Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Patient demographic: child; adolescent; adult Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 2 different assessors
Suggested observations: 3
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Patient demographic
- child
- adolescent
- adult
Communicator
- COM 1.1 Establish rapport with the patient and family
- COM 3.1 Provide accurate information about medical condition and management plan
- COM 3.1 Use plain language and avoid medical jargon
- COM 1.5 Recognize when strong emotions (such as anger, fear, anxiety, or sadness) are affecting an interaction and respond appropriately
- COM 4.3 Answer questions from the patient and/or family
- COM 3.1 Verify and validate the patient and/or family’s understanding
- COM 4.3 Use communication skills and strategies that help the patient and/or family make an informed decision
- COM 4.1 Communicate in a manner that is respectful, non-judgmental, and culturally aware
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-5
Obtaining informed consent for common pain medicine procedures
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the application of knowledge regarding the risk and benefits of, indications for, contraindications and alternatives to the proposed pain medicine intervention(s) as well as the application of communication skills and strategies to help the patient and/or family make an informed decision. - Examples of common procedures include peripheral nerve block, lumbosacral spine and sacroiliac (SI) joint block, sympathetic chain block, and common musculoskeletal and joint injections.
Direct observation of consent discussion and review of clinic note and consent documentation by supervisor Use form 1 Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 different assessors
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 3.2 Explain the risks, including common and rare but catastrophic risks, benefits, rationale, and alternatives for a proposed procedure
Communicator
- COM 4.3 Answer questions from the patient and/or family
- COM 3.1 Verify and validate the patient's and/or family's understanding
- COM 4.3 Use communication skills and strategies that help the patient and/or family make an informed decision
- COM 5.1 Complete required documentation of the consent discussion
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-6
Performing basic interventional procedures
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the application of knowledge and technical skills to perform basic interventions for pain management, including trigger point and articular injections.
Direct observation by supervisor Use form 2. Form collects information on: - Procedure: MSK (peripheral joint, trigger point); peripheral nerve; SI joint; lumbar facet/medial branch block Collect 4 observations of achievement - At least 1 of each type of procedure - At least 3 different assessors
Suggested observations: 4
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Procedure
- MSK (peripheral joint, trigger point)
- peripheral nerve
- SI joint
- lumbar facet/medial branch block
Medical Expert
- ME 2.2 Assess the patient’s suitability to proceed with the procedure, reviewing relevant investigations and medical history
- ME 3.4 Demonstrate aseptic technique and maintain universal precautions
- ME 3.4 Demonstrate effective procedure preparation, including gathering required equipment and positioning the patient
- ME 3.4 Apply knowledge of anatomy, key landmarks, and the procedure
- ME 3.4 Perform the procedure in a skilful and safe manner
- ME 3.4 Select and provide sedation and local analgesia, as relevant
- ME 3.4 Monitor patient comfort and safety, and adjust the procedure as needed
- ME 3.4 Recognize and manage complications
- ME 3.4 Establish and implement a plan for post-procedure care
Communicator
- COM 5.1 Document the procedure and outcome
Collaborator
- COL 1.2 Communicate effectively with patient and/or assistant(s) during the procedure
Professional
- P 1.1 Work within personal limits, asking for assistance as needed
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-7
Working effectively with the interprofessional pain medicine team
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the role of the interprofessional team in patient management, including other physicians, nurses, psychologists, and pharmacists, among others. - This includes understanding the various roles and scopes of practice of the team members and engaging them in the patient’s care as relevant to their role, as well as communicating and working effectively with other team members, and exhibiting professional behaviour. - The observation of this EPA is based on the resident’s interaction with a team in the care of one or more patients.
Direct and/or indirect observation by supervisor, which could include input from other members of the interprofessional team Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Settings: pain clinic; other Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 different assessors
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Settings
- pain clinic
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 4.1 Determine the need for consultation with another member of the pain management team for patient assessment and/or management
Communicator
- COM 3.1 Provide the patient with information about the role of other members of the interprofessional team in their care
Collaborator
- COL 1.2 Demonstrate an understanding of the scope and expertise of other health care professionals within the pain management team
- COL 1.2 Incorporate the perspective of other members of the pain management team in the development and/or implementation of a management plan
Professional
- P 1.1 Behave in a professional manner
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
Core
C-1
Assessing and managing patients with complex pain disorders
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on comprehensive assessment and development and implementation of a management plan that may include pharmacologic and non- pharmacologic approaches in a multidisciplinary setting. - This includes managing complications of therapy. - Examples of complex pain disorders include those with functional impairment from multiple conditions; fluctuating functional impairments; diagnostic uncertainty; rare or atypical conditions and presentations; management challenges due to social determinants of health or cultural complexities; and management challenges due to environmental context. - Assessment and/or management of pregnancy-related pain or pain during pregnancy may be observed in simulation.
Direct observation and/or case review by supervisor Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Observation: direct; case review - Demographic: child; adolescent/young adult; adult; older adult - Diagnosis: CRPS; cancer pain; persistent post-operative pain; primary headache disorder; pregnancy-related pain or pain during pregnancy; pain caused by other medical condition Collect 6 observations of achievement - At least 2 direct observations - At least 1 child, or adolescent/young adult - At least 3 different diagnoses - At least 4 different assessors
Suggested observations: 6
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Observation
- direct
- case review
Demographic
- child
- adolescent/young adult
- adult
- older adult
Diagnosis
- CRPS
- cancer pain
- persistent post-operative pain
- primary headache disorder
- pregnancy-related pain or pain during pregnancy
- pain caused by other medical condition
Medical Expert
- ME 2.2 Perform a clinical assessment that addresses all relevant issues
- ME 2.2 Select, administer, and interpret validated assessment tools
- ME 2.2 Adapt the assessment to the patient’s age, developmental stage, and cognition, as relevant
- ME 2.2 Select investigations based on a differential diagnosis
- ME 2.2 Interpret investigations to correlate the findings with the patient’s symptoms
- ME 2.4 Develop a treatment plan informed by biopsychosocial factors
- ME 4.1 Determine the need and timing of referral to another health care professional
Communicator
- COM 4.3 Engage the patient in goal setting and shared decision-making regarding management
Collaborator
- COL 1.2 Incorporate the perspective of other members of the pain management team in the development and/or implementation of a management plan
- COL 1.2 Work effectively with other health care professionals, including other physicians
Scholar
- S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-2
Assessing and managing patients with pain and comorbid substance abuse
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on providing safe and non-judgmental medical and psychosocial management for patients with a substance use disorder and/or history of opioid misuse. - This includes gathering details of the substance use, evaluating for withdrawal syndrome, reviewing prescriptions, obtaining collateral history (e.g., from pharmacies), selecting and interpreting investigations, using appropriate screening tools and standard risk measures (e.g., COMM, SOAPP-R, ORT), and managing complications of therapy. - It also includes discussing treatment options and collaborating with the pain medicine team and other specialists, as needed.
Direct observation or case discussion/review of consult letter review by supervisor Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Observation: direct; case review - Substance: alcohol; benzodiazepines; illicit/street drugs; opioids; other Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 1 direct observation - At least 1 patient with an opioid use disorder - At least 2 different assessors
Suggested observations: 3
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Observation
- direct
- case review
Substance
- alcohol
- benzodiazepines
- illicit/street drugs
- opioids
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 2.2 Gather information about previous substance use or misuse
- ME 2.2 Perform a risk assessment using validated screening questionnaires and investigations
- ME 2.2 Recognize when a patient may need addiction consultation prior to or during opioid therapy
- ME 4.1 Determine the need and timing of referral to another health care professional
- ME 4.1 Develop plans for monitoring and follow-up
Communicator
- COM 1.1 Demonstrate empathy, respect, and compassion
- COM 2.3 Gather information from collateral sources (e.g., family, pharmacy)
- COM 4.3 Engage the patient in goal setting and shared decision-making regarding management
- COM 5.1 Document clinical information, including noncompliance and aberrant behaviours
Scholar
- S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-3
Assessing and managing complex psychosocial factors in patients with pain
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the identification and management of pain-related psychological comorbidities, including anxiety, depression, catastrophizing, and suicidal ideation, using a trauma-informed approach as appropriate. - This may include responding to requests for Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID). - This EPA includes using validated screening questionnaires, assessing risk of harm, and identifying indications for referral or admission (e.g., psychology, psychiatry).
Direct observation and/or case review by supervisor, psychologist, or social worker Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Observation: direct; case review - Presentations: anxiety disorder; catastrophizing/fear avoidance; mood disorder (depression); personality disorder; somatic symptom disorder; suicidal ideation - Settings: clinical; simulation Collect 4 observations of achievement - At least 1 direct observation of a patient with suicidal ideation - At least 1 patient with catastrophization/fear avoidance - At least 1 patient with mood disorder - At least 1 patient with a personality disorder - No more than 1 observation in simulation
Suggested observations: 4
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Observation
- direct
- case review
Presentations
- anxiety disorder
- catastrophizing/fear avoidance
- mood disorder (depression)
- personality disorder
- somatic symptom disorder
- suicidal ideation
Settings
- clinical
- simulation
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Perform a clinical assessment that identifies all relevant psychosocial issues
- ME 2.2 Identify the bidirectional relationship of pain and psychological well- being and its impact on quality of life
- ME 2.2 Select and administer validated screening questionnaires for pain- related psychological comorbidities
- ME 2.2 Assess risk of harm to self or others
- ME 4.1 Determine the need and timing of referral to a mental health professional
Communicator
- COM 2.2 Gather information about what the patient is experiencing
- COM 2.2 Explore and respond to requests for Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID)
- COM 4.1 Communicate in a manner that is respectful, non-judgmental, and culturally aware
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-4
Providing pharmacological management for patients with pain disorders and comorbid medical conditions
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA builds on the knowledge and skills of the Foundations stage to include patients of all ages and complexity with comorbid conditions. - This EPA includes evidence-based selection and prescription of analgesic medications incorporating patient-specific factors such as age, impaired drug metabolism, and medication interactions, and comorbid medical conditions, and counselling the patient about analgesic benefits and risks. - It also includes managing complications of therapy.
Direct observation, case discussion and/or review of clinical documentation (consult letter, prescription) by supervisor Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Comorbidity (select all that apply): acute-on-chronic pain; cognitive or neurological impairment; hepatic impairment; perioperative; polypharmacy; pregnancy; psychiatric disorder; renal impairment; sleep disorder; other (write in) Collect 5 observations of achievement - At least 4 different comorbidities - At least 3 different assessors
Suggested observations: 5
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Comorbidity
- acute-on-chronic pain
- cognitive or neurological impairment
- hepatic impairment
- perioperative
- polypharmacy
- pregnancy
- psychiatric disorder
- renal impairment
- sleep disorder
- other (write in)
Medical Expert
- ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of guidelines for pharmacologic management of pain
- ME 2.2 Synthesize information from the clinical assessment, including concurrent conditions and treatments
- ME 2.2 Perform a risk assessment if opioids or cannabinoids are being considered
- ME 2.2 Identify significant drug interactions
- ME 2.4 Propose a management plan, which may include non-pharmacologic, pharmacologic and/or interventional strategies
- ME 3.2 Provide information to the patient about probable benefits, risks and adverse effects
- ME 2.4 Select and/or adjust dosage based on factors such as response, tolerability, age, and pharmacokinetic considerations
- ME 2.4 Select and implement a monitoring strategy, including laboratory monitoring as relevant
Communicator
- COM 5.1 Document the encounter to convey clinical reasoning and the rationale for decisions
Scholar
- S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise
Professional
- P 3.1 Adhere to regulations governing the prescribing of controlled substances
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-5
Performing the interventional image-guided procedures of Pain Medicine
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the application of knowledge and technical skills to perform interventions requiring fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance, such as peripheral nerve blocks, spine blocks, epidural, sympathetic chain blocks, and musculoskeletal and joint injections. - This includes reviewing clinical information, determining the appropriateness of the procedure and the approach, preparing for the procedure (including equipment, monitoring, sedation, etc.), using the imaging technique effectively and performing all aspects of the procedure, including selecting images to save, and documenting the procedure. - It also includes monitoring the pain response pre- and post-procedure using standardized tools (BPI, VAS, etc.) and responding to any unanticipated circumstances or complications arising during the procedure.
Direct observation by supervisor Use form 2. Form collects information on: - Procedure type: ablation/destructive; epidural; sympathetic chain - Patient complexity: low; moderate; high Collect 9 observations of achievement - At least 3 of each procedure type - A variety of patient complexities
Suggested observations: 9
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Procedure type
- ablation/destructive
- epidural
- sympathetic chain
Patient complexity
- low
- moderate
- high
Medical Expert
- ME 2.2 Assess the patient’s suitability to proceed with the procedure, reviewing relevant investigations and medical history
- ME 3.4 Demonstrate aseptic technique and maintain universal precautions
- ME 3.4 Demonstrate effective procedure preparation, including gathering required equipment, and positioning the patient
- ME 3.4 Apply knowledge of anatomy, key landmarks, and the procedure
- ME 3.4 Select and provide sedation and local analgesia, as relevant
- ME 3.4 Use imaging guidance effectively and safely
- ME 3.4 Perform the procedure in a skilful and safe manner
- ME 3.4 Monitor patient comfort and safety, and adjust the procedure as needed
- ME 3.4 Recognize and manage complications
- ME 3.4 Establish and implement a plan for post-procedure care
Communicator
- COM 5.1 Document the procedure and outcome
Collaborator
- COL 1.2 Communicate effectively with patient and/or assistant(s) during the procedure
Professional
- P 1.1 Work within personal limits, asking for assistance as needed
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-6
Identifying and referring patients who need advanced interventional procedures
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the identification of patients who require or who would benefit from assessment and/or treatment that is beyond the scope of pain medicine practice. Examples include patients who would benefit from neuromodulation and intrathecal drug delivery systems. - This EPA includes identifying the appropriate timing and urgency of referral, as well as communicating with the consultant for safe transfer of care.
Direct observation or case review by supervisor Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Indication for referral: intrathecal drug delivery device; neurolytic procedure; neuromodulation; peripheral nerve stimulation; spinal cord stimulator; vertebroplasty; other Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 1 referral for intrathecal drug delivery device, peripheral nerve stimulation, or spinal cord stimulator
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Indication for referral
- intrathecal drug delivery device
- neurolytic procedure
- neuromodulation
- peripheral nerve stimulation
- spinal cord stimulator
- vertebroplasty
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 2.2 Integrate information from the clinical assessment and investigations to determine the patient's candidacy for advanced interventional treatment
- ME 3.2 Describe a proposed therapy to the patient, including the rationale, possible adverse events, expected outcomes and alternative treatments
- ME 4.1 Formulate a clear and complete request for consultation
- ME 4.1 Establish a plan for follow-up care
Communicator
- COM 3.1 Convey information about the treatment options clearly and accurately
- COM 4.3 Use communication skills and strategies that help the patient and/or family make an informed decision
Collaborator
- COL 3.2 Summarize and document patient issues for the accepting physician, providing rationale for key decisions and recommendations for management
Leader
- L 2.1 Apply knowledge of local resources
Health Advocate
- HA 1.1 Facilitate timely patient access to services and resources
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-7
Working effectively with the interprofessional pain clinic team to facilitate integrated care
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the role of the Pain Medicine specialist in coordinating the complex care needs of patients with pain. - This includes integrating the assessments and recommendations of other team members, establishing a treatment plan with other health providers, initiating and supporting a shared model of care, and participating in team meetings to review patient progress and facilitate collaborative treatment. - The observation of this EPA is not based on a single case, but rather on a consistent pattern of behaviour over a period of time (at least one month).
Direct and/or indirect observation by supervisor, which must include input from other members of the interprofessional team Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Includes input from (select all that apply): nurse; occupational therapist; pharmacist; other physician(s); psychologist; physiotherapist; other Collect 2 observations at least one month apart
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Includes input from
- nurse
- occupational therapist
- pharmacist
- other physician(s)
- psychologist
- physiotherapist
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 4.1 Coordinate treatment and follow-up across care settings
Collaborator
- COL 1.2 Demonstrate an understanding of the scope and expertise of other health care professionals within the pain management team
- COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with other health care professionals involved in the patient’s care
- COL 1.1 Respond appropriately to input from other health care professionals
Health Advocate
- HA 1.1 Advocate for the patient’s needs and concerns
- HA 1.1 Facilitate timely patient access to services and resources
Professional
- P 1.1 Respond punctually to requests from other health care professionals
- P 1.1 Behave in a professional manner
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-8
Leading interprofessional team meetings and complex care discussions
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the role of the Pain Medicine specialist in chairing an effective meeting. - This includes planning for the meeting, leading the discussion, attending to meeting flow and organization, encouraging participation, and integrating information from the participants, and contributing medical expertise to the discussion. - This EPA includes meetings with complex issues related to the patient (e.g., psychosocial, medical) and the team (e.g., managing differences of opinion between team members, identifying, and managing conflict within the team).
Direct observation by supervisor Use form 1. Collect 1 observation of achievement
Suggested observations: 1
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Contribute clinical expertise to the discussion, as required
Communicator
- COM 1.4 Manage one’s own non-verbal communication
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Demonstrate respect for the opinions of other meeting participants
Leader
- L 3.1 Facilitate the meeting, attending to flow, organization, and time management
- L 3.1 Ensure engagement and participation of attendees
- L 3.1 Summarize and clarify key points of the meeting
Health Advocate
- HA 1.1 Advocate for the patient’s needs and concerns
Professional
- P 1.1 Intervene when behaviours towards other attendees undermine a respectful environment
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-9
Delivering scholarly teaching for a variety of audiences
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the skills of critical appraisal as well as presentation and teaching. - This EPA may be observed in a variety of settings. Examples include grand rounds or divisional rounds, lectures to students or other residents, journal club, and educational sessions for patients and families.
Direct observation by attending physician Use form 1. Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 different occasions - At least 2 different observers
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Scholar
- S 2.4 Identify the learning needs and desired learning outcomes of others
- S 2.4 Develop learning objectives for a teaching activity, adapting to the audience and setting
- S 3.3 Critically evaluate the integrity, reliability, and applicability of health- related research and literature
- S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise
- S 2.4 Present the information in an organized manner
- S 2.4 Use audiovisual aids and/or virtual platforms effectively
- S 2.4 Provide adequate time for questions and discussion
- S 1.2 Seek out feedback to improve future scholarly teaching
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
Transition to Practice
TTP-1
Managing the day of pain medicine clinic
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA integrates the resident’s medical decision-making abilities for individual cases with their ability to function effectively in the outpatient setting, including triaging patient referrals, managing a clinic load of patients, staying on time, completing administrative tasks such as billing and insurance forms, and working effectively with other health professionals. - An important aspect of this EPA is resource utilization, including fairness of access, cost effectiveness and stewardship of the limited pain medicine clinic resources. - The observation of this EPA is based on at least a half day of clinic.
Direct and indirect observation by supervisor, with input from other health professionals, admin, managers, and directors as appropriate Use form 1. Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 different assessors
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 1.1 Demonstrate responsibility and accountability for decisions regarding patient care, acting in the role of most responsible physician
- ME 1.4 Triage consultation requests based on clinical acuity
- ME 2.4 Establish management plans that consider all relevant aspects of the patient’s care
Communicator
- COM 5.1 Document clinical encounters in an accurate, complete, and timely manner
Collaborator
- COL 1.2 Work effectively with outpatient clinic staff
Leader
- L 4.2 Manage bookings to optimize clinic scheduling
- L 4.1 Manage time effectively to maintain clinic flow
- L 4.1 Review and act on results of investigations in a timely manner
Scholar
- S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise
Professional
- P 1.1 Respond punctually to requests from patients or other health care professionals
- P 1.1 Make arrangements for coverage by another physician when absent or unavailable
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
TTP-2
Transferring patient care responsibilities
Key features and assessment plan
- The focus of this EPA is the transfer of professional responsibility for patient care. - This includes planning for the transfer of care with the patient and their family and completing appropriate documentation. - It includes summarizing the patient’s medical issues, anticipating the evolution of the patient’s clinical status, and providing direction and guidance to other health care professionals involved in the transition. - This may include transfer at time of patient transition back to the referring physician or to another physician, and at the termination of the resident’s longitudinal clinic.
Direct observation or case review and review of documentation by supervisor Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Case mix: return to primary care provider; return to referring physician; transfer to another physician Collect 4 observations of achievement - At least 1 return to primary care provider - At least 2 different assessors
Suggested observations: 4
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Case mix
- return to primary care provider
- return to referring physician
- transfer to another physician
Medical Expert
- ME 2.4 Determine the setting of care appropriate for the patient’s health needs
Communicator
- COM 3.1 Provide information to the patient regarding the plan for transfer
Collaborator
- COL 3.2 Incorporate information and the perspectives of other members of the health care team when developing a plan for transfer of care
- COL 3.2 Organize the handover of care to the most appropriate physician or health care professional
- COL 3.2 Summarize all relevant issues of the clinical case in a transfer summary
- COL 3.2 Provide guidance for management of ongoing issues, anticipated changes in the clinical course, and/or indications for referral back to the pain management team
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
TTP-3
Teaching, coaching, and assessing junior colleagues
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on providing clinical supervision and teaching as well as constructive feedback in a manner aligned with coaching and/or performance improvement. - This includes assisting learners (rotating residents/students) in difficulty.
Direct and indirect observation by supervisor with input from junior learner(s) Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Trainee: medical student; junior resident - Setting: clinical care; procedure/intervention; other Collect 2 observations of achievement
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Trainee
- medical student
- junior resident
Setting
- clinical care
- procedure/intervention
- other
Scholar
- S 2.2 Create a positive learning environment
- S 2.4 Be available and accessible to junior learners, including responding to questions
- S 2.3 Balance clinical supervision and responsibility based on junior learner level of training and background, ensuring the safety of patients and learners
- S 2.4 Provide clinical teaching and/or other informal learning activities
- S 2.5 Provide specific suggestions for improvement of performance
Professional
- P 1.1 Complete learner assessments in a timely fashion
- P 1.1 Respond appropriately when behaviours toward colleagues and/or learners undermine a respectful environment
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.