Skip to content

EPA library

Interventional Radiology

Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada · 1.0 · 26 EPAs

Also available in French.

Every EPA in the published guide, shown as the form DebriefMD fills in, with its fields and answer options.

Transition to Discipline

  • TTD-1

    Obtaining informed consent for common image-guided procedures

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on effective communication with the patient and/or family in the discussion of consent for a common image-guided procedure. - This includes describing the alternatives to and benefits, risks, and expected outcomes of the procedure, including common risks as well as rare but serious risks. - It also includes responding to any questions and seeking out help or resources to answer questions prior to completion of consent. - Examples of common procedures are venous access insertion (e.g., port), angioplasty/stenting, IVC filter insertion, and tube insertion (nephrostomy, biliary drainage, etc.)

    Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Procedure: venous access insertion; angioplasty/stenting; IVC filter insertion; tube insertion (e.g., nephrostomy, biliary drainage, etc.); other (write in) Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 1 venous access insertion - At least 1 other procedure

    Suggested observations: 2

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Procedure

    1. venous access insertion
    2. angioplasty/stenting
    3. IVC filter insertion
    4. tube insertion (e.g., nephrostomy, biliary drainage, etc.)
    5. other (write in)

    Medical Expert

    • ME 3.2 Explain the risks, including common and rare but serious risks, benefits, rationale, and alternatives for a proposed procedure

    Communicator

    • COM 3.1 Use plain language and avoid medical jargon
    • COM 4.3 Answer questions from the patient and/or family
    • COM 3.1 Verify and validate the patient's and/or family's understanding
    • COM 4.3 Use communication skills and strategies that help the patient and/or family make an informed decision
    • COM 5.1 Complete required documentation of the consent discussion

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTD-2

    Participating in image-guided procedures

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on safe participation in an image-guided procedure including setting up for the procedure, maintaining sterility, adhering to universal precautions and radiation safety procedures, using the imaging equipment, and providing basic assistance in the procedure (e.g., flushing catheters, wire management).

    Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Procedure type: arterial; other (write in) Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 1 arterial procedure - At least 2 different observers

    Suggested observations: 3

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Procedure type

    1. arterial
    2. other (write in)

    Medical Expert

    • ME 3.5 Demonstrate effective procedure preparation, including gathering required equipment and positioning the patient
    • ME 3.5 Demonstrate aseptic technique and maintain universal precautions
    • ME 3.5 Use imaging equipment effectively and safely
    • ME 3.5 Provide effective procedural assistance
    • ME 5.2 Apply safe practices in the imaging suite to minimize occupational and patient risk

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Work within personal limits, asking for assistance as needed

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTD-3

    Working effectively as a member of the interprofessional team

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the role of the physician as a member of the interprofessional clinical team. - This includes contributing to the work of the team, understanding and respecting the roles of other team members, and demonstrating appropriate professional behaviours. - It also includes effectively communicating with team members, both in writing and orally, to contribute to the shared safe care of the patient. - The observation of this EPA is based on a period of time of at least a day.

    Direct or indirect observation by supervisor with input from other team members Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Includes input from (select all that apply): supervisor; nurse; technologist; administrative staff ; other (write in) - Clinical setting: intraprocedural; other - Type of interaction: oral; written Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 2 different team members providing input - At least 2 different supervisors - At least 1 intraprocedural setting - At least 1 other clinical setting - At least 2 oral interactions - At least 1 written interaction

    Suggested observations: 3

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Includes input from

    1. supervisor
    2. nurse
    3. technologist
    4. administrative staff
    5. other (write in)

    Clinical setting

    1. intraprocedural
    2. other

    Type of interaction

    1. oral
    2. written

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.2 Demonstrate an understanding of the scope and expertise of other health care professionals
    • COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with physicians and other health care professionals
    • COL 1.1 Respond appropriately to input from other health care professionals
    • COL 1.2 Work effectively as part of the interprofessional IR team, respecting the different roles of team members

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Behave in a professional manner
    • P 1.1 Respond punctually to requests from patients or other health care professionals
    • P 3.1 Adhere to the policies and procedures of the department

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

Foundations

  • F-1

    Preparing patients for and organizing unplanned image-guided procedures

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA includes assessing requests from referring physicians, determining the urgency of the procedure, identifying what needs to be done to organize the procedure, optimizing the patient for the procedure (e.g., ordering additional blood work and/or imaging), and arranging the logistics, resources, and/or other services needed in order to safely perform the procedure.

    Direct observation or case review by supervisor or TTP resident Use Form 1 Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 3 different observers

    Suggested observations: 3

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.1 Determine the urgency of a request for an image-guided procedure
    • ME 2.2 Assess the patient’s suitability to proceed with the planned procedure or therapy, reviewing relevant clinical information and investigations
    • ME 2.2 Determine whether additional blood work, treatment, and/or imaging is needed prior to an image-guided procedure
    • ME 3.5 Make arrangements for the procedure, applying knowledge of local policies and protocols
    • ME 4.1 Determine if there is a need for consultation with another specialist or service

    Communicator

    • COM 2.1 Gather and synthesize information from the referring physician

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-2

    Selecting and prescribing medication for patients undergoing a procedure

    Key features and assessment plan

    - The focus of this EPA is the appropriate use of periprocedural medications and adherence to institutional guidelines. - This includes selecting medications and doses appropriate to the patient and the procedure, and anticipating and monitoring for adverse effects of the medication during the procedure and recovery. - Examples of medications include anxiolytics, analgesics, anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, thrombolytics, antimicrobials, and reversal agents.

    Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Medication (select all that apply): analgesic; anticoagulant; antimicrobial; antiplatelet agent; anxiolytic; reversal agent; thrombolytic; other (write in) Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 1 analgesic - At least 1 anticoagulant - At least 1 antimicrobial - At least 1 anxiolytic

    Suggested observations: 3

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medication

    1. analgesic
    2. anticoagulant
    3. antimicrobial
    4. antiplatelet agent
    5. anxiolytic
    6. reversal agent
    7. thrombolytic
    8. other (write in)

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Synthesize information from the clinical assessment, including concurrent conditions and treatments
    • ME 3.1 Determine the most appropriate plan for periprocedural sedation, analgesia, prophylaxis, anticoagulation, thrombolysis, and/or reversal
    • ME 3.5 Select and/or adjust dosage based on the procedure and factors such as age and pharmacokinetic considerations
    • ME 5.2 Select and apply monitoring strategies for the procedure and recovery period demonstrating knowledge of potential complications or adverse events

    Professional

    • P 3.1 Adhere to institutional guidelines for the use of periprocedural medications

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-3

    Performing simple image-guided procedures

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the application of knowledge and technical skills to perform simple image-guided procedures. - This applies to biopsies, drainage procedures (e.g., abscess drainage, simple pigtail chest tube), tube changes, venous and arterial access, and obtaining arterial hemostasis. - It includes reviewing prior imaging, planning for the procedure and needed equipment, documenting consent, performing the procedure, reporting the procedure, and recognizing complications and either managing them or seeking assistance.

    Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Modality: CT; fluoroscopy - non-vascular; fluoroscopy – vascular; ultrasound - Procedure (select all that apply): biopsy; drainage (e.g., simple pigtail chest tube, abscess drainage); tube change; tunneled venous access; femoral arterial access; radial arterial access; obtaining arterial hemostasis Collect 8 observations of achievement - At least 1 CT - At least 1 fluoroscopy - non-vascular - At least 1 fluoroscopy – vascular - At least 1 ultrasound - At least 1 biopsy - At least 1 drainage - At least 1 tube change - At least 1 tunneled venous access - At least 1 femoral arterial access - At least 1 radial arterial access - At least 1 obtaining arterial hemostasis

    Suggested observations: 8

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Modality

    1. CT
    2. fluoroscopy - non-vascular
    3. fluoroscopy – vascular
    4. ultrasound

    Procedure

    1. biopsy
    2. drainage (e.g., simple pigtail chest tube, abscess drainage)
    3. tube change
    4. tunneled venous access
    5. femoral arterial access
    6. radial arterial access
    7. obtaining arterial hemostasis

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Assess the patient’s suitability to proceed with the planned procedure or therapy, reviewing relevant clinical information and investigations
    • ME 3.5 Demonstrate effective procedure preparation, including gathering required equipment and positioning the patient
    • ME 3.5 Demonstrate aseptic technique and maintain universal precautions
    • ME 3.5 Perform the image-guided procedure in a skilful and safe manner
    • ME 3.5 Monitor patient comfort and safety, and adjust the procedure as needed
    • ME 3.5 Recognize and manage complications

    Communicator

    • COM 5.1 Document the procedure and its outcome

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.2 Communicate effectively with patient and/or assistant(s) during the procedure

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Work within personal limits, asking for assistance as needed

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

Core

  • C-1

    Providing an interventional radiology consultation

    Key features and assessment plan

    - An interventional radiology consultation entails a face-to-face assessment in the described setting (i.e., inpatient, outpatient, emergency department) prior to the proposed procedure. - This EPA focuses on integrating the clinical assessment and investigations to evaluate available treatment options and procedural risk, and share recommendations for interventional management with the patient and/or family. - It may include arranging for additional investigations and/or referrals as needed.

    Direct observation or case review by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Setting: inpatient; outpatient; emergency department Collect 6 observations of achievement - At least 2 inpatient consultations - At least 3 outpatient consultations - At least 1 emergency department consultation

    Suggested observations: 6

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Setting

    1. inpatient
    2. outpatient
    3. emergency department

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Gather clinical information, including a focused history or chart review and a targeted physical exam as relevant
    • ME 2.2 Integrate information from the clinical assessment and prior investigations
    • ME 2.2 Determine whether additional blood work, treatment, and/or imaging is needed prior to an image-guided procedure
    • ME 4.1 Determine if there is a need for consultation with another specialist or service
    • ME 2.3 Establish goals of care with the patient and family
    • ME 2.4 Develop a management plan based on available treatment options and procedural risk

    Communicator

    • COM 4.3 Answer questions from the patient and/or family
    • COM 5.1 Document the clinical encounter to convey the clinical assessment and rationale for decisions/recommendations

    Health Advocate

    • HA 1.2 Provide recommendations for resources for patient education and support

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-2

    Interpreting vascular imaging studies

    Key features and assessment plan

    - With this EPA, the interventional radiologist applies their expertise in vascular imaging as it pertains to Interventional Radiology. - This includes assessing image quality, applying a systematic approach to image review, integrating findings with the clinical information and prior imaging studies, establishing a most likely diagnosis and a differential diagnosis, providing recommendations for management, and providing a report. - It includes MRI, CT, and ultrasound imaging modalities.

    Direct observation or case review by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Modality (select all that apply): CTA; MRA; arterial US; CTV; MRV; venous US - Imaging focus: arterial; venous Collect 12 observations of achievement - At least 6 CTA - At least 2 MRA - At least 2 arterial US - At least 2 with venous focus

    Suggested observations: 12

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Modality

    1. CTA
    2. MRA
    3. arterial US
    4. CTV
    5. MRV
    6. venous US

    Imaging focus

    1. arterial
    2. venous

    Medical Expert

    • ME 3.4 Identify anatomic landmarks, normal anatomy and variants, artefacts, and imaging pitfalls
    • ME 3.4 Identify all major and minor findings
    • ME 3.4 Correlate findings with clinical information and other imaging modalities
    • ME 3.4 Generate an appropriate differential and most likely diagnosis
    • ME 3.4 Provide recommendations for further imaging and/or management, as relevant

    Communicator

    • COM 5.1 Provide clear, concise, and accurate reports
    • COM 5.1 Communicate critical results urgently, as needed, to the referring clinician

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-3

    Preparing for advanced image-guided procedures

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA includes reviewing clinical information and prior imaging tests, determining appropriateness of the procedure, reviewing or obtaining informed consent, reviewing the technical plan and equipment and devices needed for the procedure, reviewing and adjusting medication(s) as needed, and ensuring appropriate radiation protection protocols are in effect.

    Direct observation or case review by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Observation: direct; case review - Procedure: ablation; embolization; arterial angioplasty/stenting; other (write in) Collect 4 observations of achievement - At least 1 direct observation - At least 1 ablation - At least 1 embolization - At least 1 arterial angioplasty/stenting

    Suggested observations: 4

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Observation

    1. direct
    2. case review

    Procedure

    1. ablation
    2. embolization
    3. arterial angioplasty/stenting
    4. other (write in)

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Assess the patient’s suitability to proceed with the planned procedure or therapy, reviewing relevant clinical information and investigations
    • ME 3.2 Review or obtain informed consent
    • ME 3.1 Anticipate challenges to and pitfalls and complications of the planned approach
    • ME 3.1 Develop a backup plan and establish indications to abort the procedure
    • ME 3.5 Ascertain requirements for equipment, devices, positioning, and/or anesthetic management
    • ME 3.5 Review the plan for periprocedural medications, and adjust if needed
    • ME 5.2 Apply the appropriate radiation safety protocols
    • ME 3.5 Establish a plan for post-procedural care

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-4

    Providing immediate post-procedural care

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA includes assessing the patient’s recovery from the procedure, counselling patients and/or families about post-procedural care and when to seek medical assistance, and arranging appropriate follow-up including any needed post- procedural medication changes and investigations. - It may include handing over the care of patients to other health care providers, including direct communication about urgent issues as needed.

    Direct observation or case review by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Observation: direct; case review - Type of case: interventional oncology; uterine fibroid embolization; arterial angioplasty/stenting; other (write in) Collect 4 observations of achievement - At least 1 direct observation - At least 1 interventional oncology case - At least 1 uterine fibroid embolization - At least 1 arterial angioplasty/stenting

    Suggested observations: 4

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Observation

    1. direct
    2. case review

    Type of case

    1. interventional oncology
    2. uterine fibroid embolization
    3. arterial angioplasty/stenting
    4. other (write in)

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Assess the patient’s recovery from the procedure
    • ME 2.4 Reassess or implement the plan for patient disposition
    • ME 4.1 Make arrangements for further medications, investigations and follow- up visits, as needed

    Communicator

    • COM 3.1 Provide the patient and/or family with information about their post- procedural care and indications to seek medical assistance
    • COM 3.1 Use plain language and avoid medical jargon

    Collaborator

    • COL 3.2 Provide safe handover of care to another service, as needed, recognizing when direct communication is needed (i.e. urgent issues, monitoring for adverse events)

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-5

    Documenting interventional radiology encounters

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the application of written communication skills in a variety of formats: consultations; procedure notes; progress notes; documentation of a complication. - This includes generating accurate concise documents, in a timely manner, that provide a synthesis of the findings and/or procedure, are well-organized, and convey the rationale for decisions that were made or steps that were taken. - The documents submitted for review must be the sole work of the resident.

    Document review by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Format: consultation for interventional oncology; consultation for uterine fibroid; consultation – other; documentation of a complication; procedure note; progress note Collect 6 observations of achievement - At least 1 consultation for interventional oncology - At least 1 consultation for uterine fibroid embolization - At least 1 documentation of a complication - At least 1 procedure note - At least 1 progress note

    Suggested observations: 6

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Format

    1. consultation for interventional oncology
    2. consultation for uterine fibroid
    3. consultation – other
    4. documentation of a complication
    5. procedure note
    6. progress note

    Communicator

    • COM 5.1 Organize information in appropriate sections
    • COM 5.1 Record all relevant findings and/or details of the procedure
    • COM 5.1 Convey the rationale for decisions or steps that were taken
    • COM 5.1 Provide a clear plan for any further imaging, management, and/or follow-up
    • COM 5.1 Complete clinical documentation in a timely manner

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-6

    Performing complex non-vascular procedures

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA builds on the technical skills attained in Diagnostic Radiology and includes a wide variety of procedures that are complex due to location, target characteristics, patient factors, or materials required. - This applies to the following procedures: biliary (drainage, stenting, cholecystostomy); genitourinary (drainage, stenting); gastrointestinal (gastrostomy, gastrojejunostomy, cecostomy, jejunostomy); gynecologic fertility (HSG, FTRs); tunneled drainage catheters (peritoneal, pleural); and, visceral cyst (sclerotherapy). - It includes positioning the patient, preparing the equipment, providing sedation/analgesia, visualizing relevant structures, performing the procedure (adapting it as needed), verifying the technical outcome of the procedure, and, as relevant, handling samples obtained and securing drainage devices.

    Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Procedure: gastrostomy/gastrojejunostomy; gynecologic fertility procedure; nephrostomy; transhepatic biliary drain/stent; tunneled drain insertion; other (write in) Collect 8 observations of achievement - At least 2 gastrostomy/gastrojejunostomy procedures - At least 2 nephrostomy procedures - At least 2 transhepatic biliary drain procedures - At least 1 tunneled drain insertion

    Suggested observations: 8

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Procedure

    1. gastrostomy/gastrojejunostomy
    2. gynecologic fertility procedure
    3. nephrostomy
    4. transhepatic biliary drain/stent
    5. tunneled drain insertion
    6. other (write in)

    Medical Expert

    • ME 3.5 Demonstrate effective procedure preparation, including gathering required equipment and positioning the patient
    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of anatomy, key landmarks, and the procedure
    • ME 3.5 Achieve optimum visualization of relevant structures
    • ME 3.5 Demonstrate appropriate and safe use of procedure-specific device
    • ME 3.5 Perform the procedure in a skilful and safe manner, adapting as needed
    • ME 3.5 Assess and verify the technical outcome of the procedure

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-7

    Performing venous access and recanalization procedures

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the technical skills of access, guidewire manipulation, device placement and removal, angioplasty and balloon dilation, and stent deployment. - This includes placement of complex venous access devices (e.g., lines, ports) and dialysis access related interventions (line placement and removal, venous recanalization, angioplasty of fistulas and grafts). - It includes positioning the patient, preparing the technical devices and equipment, providing sedation, obtaining vascular access, visualizing relevant structures, performing the procedure adapting it as needed, verifying the technical outcome of the procedure, and ensuring access hemostasis.

    Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Type of procedure: fistuloplasty; insertion of central venous catheter; insertion of central venous port; venoplasty; venous recanalization; venous sampling; venous stenting - Complex: yes; no Collect 6 observations of achievement - At least 2 fistuloplasty procedures - At least 2 insertions of central venous port - At least 1 other procedure - At least 1 complex procedure

    Suggested observations: 6

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Type of procedure

    1. fistuloplasty
    2. insertion of central venous catheter
    3. insertion of central venous port
    4. venoplasty
    5. venous recanalization
    6. venous sampling
    7. venous stenting

    Complex

    1. yes
    2. no

    Medical Expert

    • ME 3.5 Demonstrate effective procedure preparation, including gathering required equipment and positioning the patient
    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of anatomy, key landmarks, and the procedure
    • ME 3.5 Obtain access to the target vessel
    • ME 3.5 Select and demonstrate appropriate and safe use of required devices
    • ME 3.5 Perform the procedure in a skilful and safe manner, adapting as needed
    • ME 3.5 Assess and verify the technical outcome of the procedure
    • ME 3.5 Confirm hemostasis has been achieved

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-8

    Performing IVC filter placement/retrieval and foreign body removal

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the technical skills of IVC filter placement and retrieval (simple and complex) or retrieval of other foreign bodies.

    Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Procedure: IVC filter insertion; IVC filter retrieval; retrieval of other foreign body Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 1 IVC filter placement - At least 1 IVC filter retrieval

    Suggested observations: 2

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Procedure

    1. IVC filter insertion
    2. IVC filter retrieval
    3. retrieval of other foreign body

    Medical Expert

    • ME 3.5 Demonstrate effective procedure preparation, including gathering required equipment and positioning the patient
    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of anatomy, key landmarks, and the procedure
    • ME 3.5 Obtain vascular access
    • ME 3.5 Demonstrate appropriate and safe use of guidewires and other equipment
    • ME 3.5 Perform the procedure in a skilful and safe manner, adapting as needed
    • ME 3.5 Assess and verify the technical outcome of the procedure, including complete retrieval when relevant
    • ME 3.5 Confirm hemostasis has been achieved

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.2 Communicate effectively during the procedure

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-9

    Performing image-guided procedures for patients with arterial disease

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the technical skills applied in the assessment and improvement of arterial flow in visceral, peripheral, and aortoiliac vessels, including catheter and guidewire manipulation, angioplasty, and stent and stent graft deployment. - It includes positioning the patient, preparing the technical devices and equipment, providing sedation, obtaining vascular access, performing the angiogram, selecting the method +/- device for revascularization, performing the revascularization +/- deploying the device, verifying the technical outcome of the procedure, and ensuring access hemostasis.

    Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Intervention (select all that apply): aortoiliac intervention; peripheral intervention; visceral intervention Collect 6 observations of achievement - At least 1 aortoiliac intervention - At least 1 peripheral arterial intervention - At least 1 visceral arterial intervention

    Suggested observations: 6

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Intervention

    1. aortoiliac intervention
    2. peripheral intervention
    3. visceral intervention

    Medical Expert

    • ME 3.5 Demonstrate effective procedure preparation, including gathering required equipment and positioning the patient
    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of anatomy, key landmarks, and the procedure
    • ME 3.5 Select and provide sedation and local analgesia, as relevant
    • ME 3.5 Obtain vascular access
    • ME 3.5 Perform the angiogram achieving optimum visualization of relevant structures
    • ME 3.5 Select and use the appropriate device and technique for revascularization
    • ME 3.5 Assess and verify the technical outcome of the procedure
    • ME 3.5 Confirm hemostasis has been achieved

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.2 Communicate effectively during the procedure

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Work within personal limits, asking for assistance as needed

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-10

    Performing catheter directed thrombectomy and thrombolysis

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the technical skills of treating arterial and venous thrombosis, including pulmonary and systemic arteries, deep venous and portal vein thrombosis, and occluded dialysis fistulae and grafts. - This includes positioning the patient, preparing the equipment, obtaining vascular access, navigating to the vessel and obtaining visualization, selecting the device/agent for thrombectomy or thrombolysis, deploying the device and/or injecting the thrombolytic agent, verifying the technical outcome, and ensuring access hemostasis.

    Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Presentation: arterial thrombosis; deep venous thrombosis; pulmonary embolism; portal vein thrombosis; occluded dialysis fistula or graft - Method: mechanical; pharmacologic; both Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 different presentations - At least 1 mechanical method - At least 1 pharmacological method

    Suggested observations: 2

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Presentation

    1. arterial thrombosis
    2. deep venous thrombosis
    3. pulmonary embolism
    4. portal vein thrombosis
    5. occluded dialysis fistula or graft

    Method

    1. mechanical
    2. pharmacologic
    3. both

    Medical Expert

    • ME 3.5 Obtain vascular access
    • ME 3.5 Navigate to the site and visualize relevant structures
    • ME 3.5 Select the appropriate device/agent for thrombectomy or thrombolysis
    • ME 3.5 Utilize the device appropriately and/or inject the thrombolytic agent at the proper location
    • ME 3.5 Assess and verify the technical outcome of the procedure
    • ME 3.5 Confirm hemostasis has been achieved

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-11

    Performing arterial, venous, and lymphatic embolization procedures

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the technical skills of performing an embolization procedure, in a variety of sites. - Examples of conditions treated by these techniques include bleeding, visceral artery aneurysm, pseudoaneurysm, vascular malformation, varicocele, pelvic congestion, lymphatic leaks, and endoleaks. - The EPA includes positioning the patient, preparing the equipment, providing local anesthesia, obtaining vascular access, navigating to the appropriate site, delivering the embolic agent, verifying technical outcome of the procedure, and ensuring access hemostasis.

    Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Embolic agent (select all that apply): coils/plugs; particles; gelfoam; liquid embolic - Site (select all that apply): arterial; venous; lymphatic - Active bleeding: yes; no - Microcatheter: yes; no Collect 6 observations of achievement - At least 1 coils/plugs - At least 1 particles - At least 1 gelfoam - At least 1 liquid embolic - At least 2 different sites - At least 2 active bleeding - At least 3 using microcatheter

    Suggested observations: 6

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Embolic agent

    1. coils/plugs
    2. particles
    3. gelfoam
    4. liquid embolic

    Site

    1. arterial
    2. venous
    3. lymphatic

    Active bleeding

    1. yes
    2. no

    Microcatheter

    1. yes
    2. no

    Medical Expert

    • ME 3.5 Demonstrate effective procedure preparation, including gathering required equipment and positioning the patient
    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of anatomy, key landmarks, and the procedure
    • ME 3.5 Select and provide sedation and local analgesia, as relevant
    • ME 3.5 Obtain vascular access
    • ME 3.5 Navigate to the appropriate site
    • ME 3.5 Select and accurately deliver the embolic agent
    • ME 3.5 Perform the procedure in a skilful and safe manner, adapting as needed
    • ME 3.5 Assess and verify the technical outcome of the procedure
    • ME 3.5 Confirm hemostasis has been achieved

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.2 Communicate effectively during the procedure

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Work within personal limits, asking for assistance as needed

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-12

    Performing ablation and embolization of tumours and masses

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the technical skills of treatments for patients with any soft tissue, bone, or organ-based tumour (benign or malignant), including ablations and bland embolization, chemoembolization (TACE), and radioembolization (TARE). - This includes positioning the patient, preparing the technical devices and materials, providing local anesthesia and obtaining access to the target lesion, performing the ablation/embolization, adapting the procedure as needed, verifying technical outcome of the procedure, and ensuring access hemostasis.

    Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Technique: ablation-kidney; ablation-liver; bland embolization-kidney; bland embolization-liver; bland embolization-uterus; TACE-liver or TARE-liver; other (write in) Collect 8 observations of achievement - At least 2 ablations of the liver - At least 2 ablations of the kidney - At least 2 embolization of the uterus - At least 2 TACE or TARE of the liver

    Suggested observations: 8

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Technique

    1. ablation-kidney
    2. ablation-liver
    3. bland embolization-kidney
    4. bland embolization-liver
    5. bland embolization-uterus
    6. TACE-liver or TARE-liver
    7. other (write in)

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of anatomy, key landmarks, and the procedure
    • ME 3.5 Achieve optimum visualization of relevant structures
    • ME 3.5 Obtain access to the target lesion
    • ME 3.5 Prepare and use the embolic agent and delivery system
    • ME 3.5 Prepare and use the ablation system
    • ME 3.5 Assess and verify the technical outcome of the procedure

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-13

    Performing assessment of and interventions for patients with portal hypertension

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on applying knowledge of the unique physiology of portal hypertension as well as technical skills to perform transjugular biopsy and pressure measurements, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPSS) creation and management, and portosystemic shunt management. - This includes positioning the patient, preparing the equipment, providing sedation, obtaining access to the target vessel, performing the procedure (adapting it as needed), utilizing experienced assistants when indicated, and ensuring access hemostasis.

    Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Procedure: transjugular biopsy and pressure measurements; TIPSS; portosystemic shunt management Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 1 transjugular biopsy and pressure measurements - At least 1 TIPSS

    Suggested observations: 2

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Procedure

    1. transjugular biopsy and pressure measurements
    2. TIPSS
    3. portosystemic shunt management

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of anatomy, key landmarks, and the procedure
    • ME 3.5 Obtain access to the target vessel
    • ME 3.5 Achieve optimum visualization of relevant structures
    • ME 3.5 Perform the procedure in a skilful and safe manner, adapting as needed
    • ME 3.5 Select and deliver the device and/or embolic agent
    • ME 3.5 Assess and verify the technical outcome of the procedure, including pressure measurements when relevant
    • ME 3.5 Make effective use of assistants as indicated

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.2 Communicate effectively during the procedure

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-14

    Performing procedures for pain management

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the technical skills of injections (epidural, MSK and appendicular), nerve and facet blocks in the axial skeleton, plexus blocks (celiac, hypogastric, splanchnic, cervical, lumbar, ganglion impar, stellate ganglion), and cement augmentation (vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, long bone). - It also includes monitoring the pain response pre- and post-procedure and responding to any unanticipated circumstances arising during the procedure.

    Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Procedure: cement augmentation; epidural injection; facet block; joint injection; nerve block; plexus block; other (write in) Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 2 different procedures

    Suggested observations: 3

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Procedure

    1. cement augmentation
    2. epidural injection
    3. facet block
    4. joint injection
    5. nerve block
    6. plexus block
    7. other (write in)

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of anatomy, key landmarks, and the procedure
    • ME 3.5 Perform the procedure in a skilful and safe manner, adapting as needed
    • ME 3.5 Monitor the patient’s pain response and adjust the procedure as needed

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-15

    Recognizing and managing complications

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA includes recognizing when a complication has occurred during or as a result of an image-guided procedure, stabilizing the patient, and either managing the complication directly or arranging for another physician/service to address the problem, and organizing appropriate patient disposition and follow-up. - It may include disclosure and communication to the patient and family, if relevant. - Examples of complications include bleeding, allergic reaction, oversedation, hemodynamic instability, dissection, thrombosis, pneumothorax, perforation, non-target embolization, cardiac arrest, loss of access, and equipment failure. - Minor and major complication definitions refer to the Society of Interventional Radiology adverse event classifications.

    Direct observation or case review by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Observation: direct; case review - Timing: intraprocedural; periprocedural; delayed - Classification: minor complication; major complication Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 1 direct observation - At least 1 intraprocedural - At least 1 periprocedural - At least 1 delayed - At least 1 major complication

    Suggested observations: 3

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Observation

    1. direct
    2. case review

    Timing

    1. intraprocedural
    2. periprocedural
    3. delayed

    Classification

    1. minor complication
    2. major complication

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Recognize and respond to changes in the patient’s clinical status
    • ME 2.2 Develop a differential diagnosis
    • ME 2.2 Assess the patient in a timely manner without excluding key elements
    • ME 2.4 Initiate management to stabilize the patient
    • ME 2.2 Select and/or interpret investigations
    • ME 2.4 Develop a plan for definitive management and/or consultation and handover to another service

    Communicator

    • COM 3.2 Disclose the complication/adverse event to the patient and/or family

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-16

    Managing the interventional suite

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA integrates procedural abilities for individual cases with the ability to work effectively in the interventional suite: managing the workflow, staying on schedule, ensuring safety measures are followed, monitoring and adjusting room and equipment set up, working effectively with the team, and performing the list of procedures. - An important aspect of this EPA is working within one’s limits and asking for assistance when needed. - Observation of this EPA is based on managing a full day’s list.

    Direct or indirect observation by supervisor with input from other team members Use Form 1 Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 different observers

    Suggested observations: 2

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 5.2 Adhere to occupational safety procedures to ensure patient, personal, and team safety
    • ME 1.6 Adapt to unanticipated findings or changing clinical circumstances
    • ME 5.1 Recognize and manage adverse events and emergency conditions requiring urgent medical attention

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.2 Work effectively as part of the interprofessional IR team, respecting the different roles of team members

    Leader

    • L 4.1 Manage time effectively to maintain patient flow

    Professional

    • P 1.2 Prepare for the day, reviewing the list of planned procedures
    • P 1.1 Work within personal limits, asking for assistance as needed

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

Transition to Practice

  • TTP-1

    Managing the delivery of interventional radiology services

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the IR subspecialist’s role in the overall delivery of safe patient care, maintaining the volume and quality of the service. - This includes: prioritization and scheduling of cases; adapting the day’s schedule to changes in health human resources, patient flow and/or arising urgent cases; allocating learner assignments; responding to calls and requests from other physicians; and protocolling future procedures. - It also includes working effectively with the interprofessional team, coordinating patient disposition, and applying time management skills to simultaneously fulfil multiple clinical responsibilities. - The observation of this EPA is based on a day’s work.

    Direct and indirect observation by supervisor with input from members of interventional radiology team Use Form 1 Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 different supervisors

    Suggested observations: 2

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.1 Prioritize requests for image-guided procedures
    • ME 3.4 Protocol and troubleshoot diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures
    • ME 4.1 Coordinate post-procedure care, including patient disposition and arrangements for further investigations and/or follow-up
    • ME 1.5 Carry out professional duties in the face of multiple competing demands

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.2 Coordinate scheduling of cases with technologists, nurses, and other supporting staff and services
    • COL 1.3 Respond to referring physicians’ questions and requests in a timely manner
    • COL 1.2 Work effectively as part of the interprofessional IR team, respecting the different roles of team members

    Leader

    • L 3.1 Adapt schedules to address changing priorities and/or a change in resources, including equipment malfunction and changes in staffing
    • L 4.1 Allocate learner assignments, balancing opportunities for learners and efficient and safe patient care

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Behave in a professional manner

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTP-2

    Contributing expertise in the interdisciplinary care of the complex patient

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the role of the interventional radiologist as the authority providing interventional radiology expertise in a multidisciplinary team discussion. - This includes preparing for the discussion by reviewing imaging and identifying image- guided treatment options, anticipating challenges to the IR approach and formulating a management plan, contributing to the discussion about treatment options, advocating for the patient, and demonstrating professional behaviour.

    Direct observation by supervisor with input from other clinicians Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Setting: multidisciplinary rounds; morbidity and mortality rounds; other (write in) Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 1 multidisciplinary rounds - At least 2 different supervisors

    Suggested observations: 2

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Setting

    1. multidisciplinary rounds
    2. morbidity and mortality rounds
    3. other (write in)

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Synthesize cases for discussion at interdisciplinary rounds
    • ME 2.4 Formulate a management plan, anticipating challenges to the IR approach

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.3 Convey information to clinicians in a manner that enhances patient management
    • COL 1.3 Encourage discussion, questions, and interaction relevant to the case
    • COL 2.2 Facilitate consensus on treatment options

    Health Advocate

    • HA 1.1 Propose treatment options that are specific to the patient’s goals and interests

    Scholar

    • S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Behave in a professional manner

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTP-3

    Providing clinical teaching and supervision

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the teaching that occurs in the interventional radiology suite, and includes ensuring safe patient care, teaching, and providing feedback. - This includes supervising and teaching medical students and other residents.

    Direct observation by supervisor, incorporating feedback from learners Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Type of learner (select all that apply): medical student; IR resident; other resident Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 different types of learners - At least 2 different supervisors

    Suggested observations: 2

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Type of learner

    1. medical student
    2. IR resident
    3. other resident

    Collaborator

    • COL 2.1 Delegate tasks and responsibilities in an appropriate and respectful manner

    Scholar

    • S 2.3 Be accessible and supportive to junior learners
    • S 2.4 Identify the learning needs and desired learning outcomes of others
    • S 2.4 Provide clinical teaching and/or other informal learning activities
    • S 2.5 Provide feedback to enhance learning and performance
    • S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTP-4

    Advancing the discipline through scholarly work

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA includes all relevant aspects of performing scholarly work: identification of a question for investigation, literature review, project design, ethics approval, data gathering, data analysis, reflective critique, and dissemination. - This may include scholarly activities related to clinical or basic science research, patient safety, quality improvement or education scholarship. - Assessment is based on the submission of a completed scholarly project and may also include observation of the presentation of the scholarly work at a local, national, or international meeting.

    Review of presentation or submitted project by supervisor Use Form 4 Collect 1 observation of achievement

    Suggested observations: 1

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Scholar

    • S 4.4 Generate focused questions for scholarly investigation
    • S 3.3 Critically evaluate the literature with an effective summary
    • S 4.4 Select appropriate methods of addressing a given scholarly question
    • S 4.2 Identify ethical principles in research, including patient privacy concerns
    • S 4.4 Collect data for a scholarly project
    • S 4.4 Perform data analysis
    • S 4.4 Interpret and integrate data in the context of existing literature
    • S 4.5 Disseminate the findings of scholarly activity, in written or oral form

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2025 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.