Skip to content

EPA library

Hematological Pathology

Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada · 1.0 · 28 EPAs

Also available in French.

Every EPA in the published guide, shown as the form DebriefMD fills in, with its fields and answer options.

Transition to Discipline

  • TTD-1

    Gathering and summarizing information from electronic medical records and the laboratory information system

    Key features and assessment plan

    - The focus of this EPA is the use of clinical and laboratory information systems to extract relevant patient data and present a concise summary of the patient’s medical history and primary issues to the attending staff.

    Direct observation and/or case discussion by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Specimen: bone marrow; coagulation testing; peripheral blood film; transfusion antibody panel; transfusion reaction - Observation: direct; indirect Collect 5 observations of achievement - At least 1 of each specimen type - At least 1 direct observation - At least 3 different assessors

    Suggested observations: 5

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Specimen

    1. bone marrow
    2. coagulation testing
    3. peripheral blood film
    4. transfusion antibody panel
    5. transfusion reaction

    Observation

    1. direct
    2. indirect

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Interpret history and relevant investigations in light of the clinical question
    • ME 2.2 Synthesize and organize clinical information for clear and succinct presentation

    Communicator

    • COM 2.3 Seek and integrate information from various sources

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTD-2

    Investigating sample issues from sample procurement site through to sample archiving

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on demonstrating an understanding of sources of error and the challenges involved in the pre-analytic, analytic, and post-analytic phases of sample procurement, including the blood component life cycle. - This EPA includes identifying the different types of samples sent to the laboratory, including types of containers, tubes, fixatives, and storage parameters. - This EPA may include filling out an incidence report form and discussing the incident with a supervisor.

    Direct observation and/or case discussion and review of report by supervisor, technologist or lab manager Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Specimen: bone marrow; coagulation – routine; coagulation - special; routine CBC; sample for send out; type and screen for blood bank - Phase of testing: pre-analytic; analytic; post-analytic - Observation: direct; case discussion/review of report Collect 8 observations of achievement - At least 1 of each specimen type - At least 1 of each phase of testing - At least 5 direct observations - At least 3 case discussions with supervisor - At least 3 different assessors

    Suggested observations: 8

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Specimen

    1. bone marrow
    2. coagulation – routine
    3. coagulation - special
    4. routine CBC
    5. sample for send out
    6. type and screen for blood bank

    Phase of testing

    1. pre-analytic
    2. analytic
    3. post-analytic

    Observation

    1. direct
    2. case discussion/review of report

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of the procedures for specimen collection and identification, and all pre-analytical variables
    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of the potential clinical impact of improper handling or processing of specimens
    • ME 2.2 Identify basic principles of specimen adequacy as they apply to hematological specimens
    • ME 2.2 Identify pre-analytical, analytical, or post-analytical stages and sources of error

    Communicator

    • COM 4.1 Contribute to an error submission form or error monitoring system document

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Complete assigned responsibilities
    • P 2.2 Demonstrate a commitment to patient safety and quality improvement through adherence to institutional policies and procedures

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTD-3

    Performing initial microscopic examinations

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on performing an initial microscopic examination of a specimen, including setting up a microscope, identifying the typical components of a sample, and performing initial quality control (e.g., slide components correspond to sampled tissue or fluid, checking quality of sample). - This EPA includes operating basic digital microscopy equipment and software (e.g., Cellavision(R)).

    Direct observation and case discussion by supervisor, Core or TTP resident, or senior charge technologist Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Specimen: bone marrow; CSF; peripheral blood smear; other body fluid Collect 10 observations of achievement - At least 2 of each specimen

    Suggested observations: 10

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Specimen

    1. bone marrow
    2. CSF
    3. peripheral blood smear
    4. other body fluid

    Medical Expert

    • ME 3.4 Perform basic microscope operation and maintenance
    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of microscope use including Kohler illumination and polarization
    • ME 2.2 Perform initial quality control of the sample and patient identification
    • ME 2.2 Assess the quality of the sample and any impact on the diagnostic interpretation
    • ME 1.3 Apply basic knowledge of light microscopic appearance of specimens
    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of the principles of digital imaging
    • ME 3.4 Perform basic microscope camera and imaging software operation

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

Foundations

  • F-1

    Providing reports of routine peripheral blood film and body fluid specimen investigations

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on synthesizing pertinent patient information, both clinical and from the pathology assessment, to develop a differential diagnosis and appropriate recommendations for follow-up. - This includes recognizing when a case is complex or life threatening. - This EPA includes demonstrating an understanding of automated cell counters, technology and quality control, and identifying interferences and artifacts of the investigation.

    Direct observation with case discussion or review of final report by supervisor or Core or TTP resident Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Specimen: body fluid; peripheral blood - Type of disease: neoplastic; non-neoplastic - Disorder: lymphoid; myeloid; non-hematopoietic - Complex or life threatening: yes; no - Demographic: pediatric; adult Collect 10 observations of achievement - At least 1 of each type of disease - At least 1 of each type of disorder - At least 1 complex or life threatening - At least 5 different assessors

    Suggested observations: 10

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Specimen

    1. body fluid
    2. peripheral blood

    Type of disease

    1. neoplastic
    2. non-neoplastic

    Disorder

    1. lymphoid
    2. myeloid
    3. non-hematopoietic

    Complex or life threatening

    1. yes
    2. no

    Demographic

    1. pediatric
    2. adult

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Assess the quality of the sample and any impact on the diagnostic interpretation
    • ME 2.2 Perform morphologic assessment of peripheral blood or body fluid
    • ME 2.2 Interpret results of a blood film or body fluid investigation
    • ME 2.2 Synthesize patient information to determine diagnosis
    • ME 2.2 Recognize critical or unexpected findings

    Communicator

    • COM 4.1 Generate a clear, concise report that enhances patient management

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Work within personal limits, seeking assistance as needed

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-2

    Triaging and ordering ancillary studies on tissues and fluids

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on triaging specimens for ancillary studies based on the clinical scenario and directing preservation and distribution of the tissue for further testing. - This includes handling specimens and submitting tissues for ancillary studies in the appropriate medium. - It also includes the identification of sample deficiencies, including sources of pre- analytical errors. - Tests may include: morphology; flow cytometry; molecular testing including next generation sequencing (NGS); cytogenetics including FISH; immunohistochemistry; and microbiology. - This EPA includes executing the lymphoma protocol on fresh lymphoid or other tissue.

    Direct observation and/or case discussion by supervisor or Core or TTP resident Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Specimen: body fluid; bone marrow; lymph node; peripheral blood - Disorder: acute lymphoid; acute myeloid; chronic lymphoid; chronic myeloid; infectious - Lymphoma protocol: yes; no - Testing modality (select all that apply): cytogenetics; flow cytometry; immunohistochemistry; microbiology; molecular; morphology - Referred out: no; yes Collect 10 observations of achievement - At least 2 cases of acute myeloid disorder - At least 2 cases of chronic myeloid disorder - At least 2 cases requiring the lymphoma protocol - At least 2 cases with more than 3 testing modalities required - At least 1 case referred out for testing

    Suggested observations: 10

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Specimen

    1. body fluid
    2. bone marrow
    3. lymph node
    4. peripheral blood

    Disorder

    1. acute lymphoid
    2. acute myeloid
    3. chronic lymphoid
    4. chronic myeloid
    5. infectious

    Lymphoma protocol

    1. yes
    2. no

    Testing modality

    1. cytogenetics
    2. flow cytometry
    3. immunohistochemistry
    4. microbiology
    5. molecular
    6. morphology

    Referred out

    1. no
    2. yes

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Assess the quality of the sample and any impact on the diagnostic interpretation
    • ME 3.1 Recognize when a specimen might require ancillary studies
    • ME 2.2 Select ancillary investigations
    • ME 3.3 Prioritize routine and ancillary studies when specimen adequacy is limited
    • ME 2.2 Maintain the integrity required for the specific ancillary study (e.g., nucleic acid integrity for molecular testing, viable cells for cytogenetics)

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.3 Consult with clinical colleagues, when appropriate, to ascertain if ancillary studies would be of value
    • COL 1.1 Receive and appropriately respond to input from other health care professionals (e.g., pathology assistants, technologists)

    Leader

    • L 2.2 Apply evidence and guidelines with respect to resource utilization

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-3

    Providing reports of routine hemoglobinopathy investigations

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA includes gathering relevant clinical information, incorporating results of complete blood count (CBC) and associated lab results, and interpreting and providing reports of hemoglobinopathy investigations. - The report must demonstrate an understanding of relevant methodologies, including molecular, and the clinical impact of testing, and effectively communicate results to the clinical team. - This EPA includes triaging and ordering ancillary tests as appropriate. - At this stage, complex diagnoses and red cell membrane disorders/enzyme disorders are not included. That is an EPA of the Core stage.

    Direct observation by supervisor or Core or TTP resident Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Disorder: alpha chain variant; alpha thalassemia; beta chain variant; beta thalassemia - Ancillary studies required: no; yes Collect 5 observations of achievement - At least 3 different disease types - At least 2 hematopathologists - At least 2 different assessors

    Suggested observations: 5

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Disorder

    1. alpha chain variant
    2. alpha thalassemia
    3. beta chain variant
    4. beta thalassemia

    Ancillary studies required

    1. no
    2. yes

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Gather relevant aspects of clinical information
    • ME 2.2 Interpret a hemoglobinopathy investigation
    • ME 2.2 Correlate findings with clinical information and results of other investigations
    • ME 2.2 Synthesize patient information to determine diagnosis
    • ME 3.1 Recognize when a specimen might require ancillary studies
    • ME 2.2 Select ancillary investigations

    Communicator

    • COM 4.1 Generate a clear, concise report that enhances patient management

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-4

    Providing advice to physicians regarding routine blood component requests

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA includes providing advice on routine transfusion management in a variety of clinical settings. - This includes applying evidence-based indications to routine blood component requests, investigating antibodies and transfusion reactions, and providing advice to clinicians. - This may include gathering patient information and discussing risks, benefits, and alternatives to routine blood products with physicians.

    Case review by supervisor or TTP resident, with input from requesting clinician and/or transfusion medicine charge technologist/ manager as required Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Urgency: non-urgent; urgent - Observer role: hematopathologist; transfusion medicine medical director; TTP resident - Demographic: pediatric; adult - Component: cryoprecipitate; plasma; plasma derived product; platelet; red cell; other (write-in) Collect 6 observations of achievement - At least 1 of each named component - At least 1 “other” component - At least 2 by staff hematopathologist - At least 3 different assessors

    Suggested observations: 6

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Urgency

    1. non-urgent
    2. urgent

    Observer role

    1. hematopathologist
    2. transfusion medicine medical director
    3. TTP resident

    Demographic

    1. pediatric
    2. adult

    Component

    1. cryoprecipitate
    2. plasma
    3. plasma derived product
    4. platelet
    5. red cell
    6. other (write-in)

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of indications, risks, and alternatives for blood components and blood products
    • ME 2.2 Gather relevant aspects of clinical information
    • ME 2.1 Determine the acuity of the issue and the priorities for patient care
    • ME 2.2 Select and interpret serological and other laboratory investigations
    • ME 2.2 Select the most appropriate blood product
    • ME 2.4 Modify and/or release routine blood components and products for clinical use

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.3 Provide advice to clinical colleagues regarding blood transfusion management, including transfusion reactions

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-5

    Assessing and initiating investigations for patients with bleeding or clotting disorders

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on an organized and comprehensive patient-centered approach to performing hematology-focused examinations and gathering patient history information, including an appropriate bleeding history or questionnaire. - This EPA includes ordering and interpreting initial lab investigations for common bleeding and clotting disorders, such as hemophilia, von Willebrand disease, platelet dysfunction, liver disease, DIC, and antiphospholipid syndrome.

    Direct and or indirect observation by supervisor, Core or TTP resident or technologist Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Disorder: acquired coagulation disorder; inherited coagulation disorder; acquired hypercoagulable state; inherited thrombophilia; acquired platelet dysfunction; inherited platelet dysfunction Collect 12 observations of achievement - At least 1 in each category of disease - At least 2 different observers

    Suggested observations: 12

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Disorder

    1. acquired coagulation disorder
    2. inherited coagulation disorder
    3. acquired hypercoagulable state
    4. inherited thrombophilia
    5. acquired platelet dysfunction
    6. inherited platelet dysfunction

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Gather relevant aspects of clinical information
    • ME 2.2 Interpret the information in light of the clinical question
    • ME 2.2 Select and/or interpret investigations
    • ME 1.4 Recognize urgent problems that may need the involvement of more experienced colleagues and seek their assistance

    Communicator

    • COM 2.1 Use patient-centred interviewing skills
    • COM 2.3 Seek and integrate information from various sources

    Leader

    • L 2.1 Demonstrate judicious use of laboratory testing

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-6

    Performing bone marrow aspiration and biopsy

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA includes: obtaining informed consent or confirming that consent has been obtained; preparing materials; safe handling of instruments, biologic samples, and biohazardous material; performing the procedure; obtaining an adequate sample (determined by visual assessment at the time of the procedure); and managing any immediate procedure related complications. - This EPA may be observed with inpatients and outpatients, in the ward (including ICU), operating room or designated procedure room setting.

    Direct observation by supervisor, Core or TTP hematological pathology resident, or hematology resident Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Demographic: pediatric (<5yrs); pediatric (>5 yrs); adult - Resident obtained informed consent: yes; no Collect 7 observations of achievement - At least 2 pediatric cases <5yrs - At least 1 case in which the resident obtained informed consent - At least 2 observed by either staff hematopathologist or staff hematologist - At least 3 different assessors

    Suggested observations: 7

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Demographic

    1. pediatric (<5yrs)
    2. pediatric (>5 yrs)
    3. adult

    Resident obtained informed consent

    1. yes
    2. no

    Medical Expert

    • ME 3.1 Determine the safety and appropriateness of the procedure
    • ME 3.2 Obtain and document informed consent, explaining the risks and rationale for a proposed procedure
    • ME 3.4 Demonstrate effective procedure preparation
    • ME 3.4 Prepare to obtain and handle samples, sending for appropriate testing
    • ME 3.4 Set up and position the patient for the procedure
    • ME 3.4 Maintain universal precautions
    • ME 3.4 Prepare and cleanse the procedural site
    • ME 3.4 Perform the procedure in a skilful and safe manner, adapting to unanticipated findings or changing clinical circumstances
    • ME 3.4 Demonstrate safe handling of instruments and biologic samples
    • ME 3.4 Recognize and manage complications
    • ME 3.4 Document the procedure, including adequacy of specimen obtained and the presence/absence of complications

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-7

    Preparing cases for multidisciplinary rounds, teaching or peer review

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on gathering appropriate materials, slides, and photos for the purposes of a presentation or peer review. - This includes summarizing pertinent clinical history, images, laboratory investigations and other ancillary test results. - This includes preparing a presentation including taking digital photos as appropriate. - This EPA does not include presenting the case.

    Review of materials by supervisor or TTP resident Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Type of presentation: departmental rounds; multidisciplinary rounds; peer review; teaching - Case origin: external; internal - Observer role: hematopathologist; TTP resident Collect 5 observations of achievement - At least 2 different types of presentation - At least 1 external case - At least 2 by staff hematopathologist - At least 3 different assessors

    Suggested observations: 5

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Type of presentation

    1. departmental rounds
    2. multidisciplinary rounds
    3. peer review
    4. teaching

    Case origin

    1. external
    2. internal

    Observer role

    1. hematopathologist
    2. TTP resident

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Gather relevant aspects of clinical information
    • ME 2.2 Select and/or interpret investigations
    • ME 2.2 Prepare images of relevant specimens
    • ME 2.2 Summarize clinical information in a manner that accurately reflects the patient's presentation

    Communicator

    • COM 2.3 Seek and integrate information from various sources

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-8

    Performing routine quality control activities in the lab

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the role of the hematological pathologist in routine quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) monitoring of laboratory tests. - This includes the interpretation of quality control data.

    Direct observation by supervisor or medical laboratory technologist Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Lab activity: statistical method; review of qualitative automated QC; review of qualitative manual QC; review of quantitative automated QC; review of quantitative manual QC; other (write-in) Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 3 different lab activities

    Suggested observations: 3

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Lab activity

    1. statistical method
    2. review of qualitative automated QC
    3. review of qualitative manual QC
    4. review of quantitative automated QC
    5. review of quantitative manual QC
    6. other (write-in)

    Leader

    • L 1.4 Apply knowledge of the metrics and measurement systems used to track quality management and safety activities
    • L 1.1 Review and interpret quality control data
    • L 1.4 Identify variations and gaps between actual and targeted performance using thresholds
    • L 1.1 Identify when a finding or occurrence requires action to ensure quality of laboratory services

    Professional

    • P 3.1 Adhere to the relevant codes, policies, standards, and laws governing laboratory practice, including accreditation standards, standard operating procedures, and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standards

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-9

    Communicating effectively with the interprofessional team

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on communication and collaboration with other physicians and members of the interprofessional team that may include physicians, technologists, nurses, clinical scientists, and managers, among others.

    Multiple observers provide feedback individually, which is then collated to one report Use Form 3. Form collects information on: - Observer role: clinical scientist; lab manager; physician; technologist; other Collect feedback from at least 3 observers on 3 occasions

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Observer role

    1. clinical scientist
    2. lab manager
    3. physician
    4. technologist
    5. other

    Medical Expert

    • ME 4.1 Recognize and respond to situations or results that warrant verbal reporting to the referring physician
    • ME 2.4 Summarize findings for the lab or health care team and provide suggestions for further testing and/or patient management

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.3 Convey information to clinicians in a manner that enhances patient management
    • COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with other health care professionals

    Health Advocate

    • HA 1.1 Respond to individual patient diagnostic needs and issues as part of patient care

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviours

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

Core

  • C-1

    Providing reports of complex peripheral blood film and body fluid specimen investigations

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on synthesizing pertinent patient information, both clinical and from the pathology assessment, to develop a diagnosis, and generate a timely and clinically relevant report. - This includes integrating clinical, laboratory, and morphologic findings, selecting and interpreting ancillary testing, and recognizing when further specialized testing for enzyme or red cell disorders is required. - It also includes recognizing critical results requiring communication. - Complex specimen investigations include those with more than one abnormality and those that require at least one ancillary test in addition to morphology.

    Direct observation and review of report by supervisor or TTP resident Use Form 1: Form collects information on: - Specimen: blood film; body fluid - Type of disease: neoplastic; non-neoplastic - Disorder: lymphoid; myeloid; non-hematopoietic - Critical results: yes; no - Demographic: pediatric; adult - Ancillary studies required: yes; no Collect 10 observations of achievement - At least 1 of each type of disease - At least 1 of each disorder - At least 2 with critical results requiring communication - At least 3 pediatric cases - At least 5 different assessors

    Suggested observations: 10

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Specimen

    1. blood film
    2. body fluid

    Type of disease

    1. neoplastic
    2. non-neoplastic

    Disorder

    1. lymphoid
    2. myeloid
    3. non-hematopoietic

    Critical results

    1. yes
    2. no

    Demographic

    1. pediatric
    2. adult

    Ancillary studies required

    1. yes
    2. no

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Assess the quality of the sample and any impact on the diagnostic interpretation
    • ME 2.2 Perform morphologic assessment of peripheral blood or body fluid
    • ME 3.1 Recognize when a specimen might require ancillary studies
    • ME 2.2 Interpret results of a blood film or body fluid investigation
    • ME 2.2 Correlate the hematological findings with the clinical history
    • ME 2.2 Recognize critical or unexpected findings
    • ME 2.2 Establish a diagnosis that takes into account clinical correlation

    Communicator

    • COM 4.1 Generate a clear, concise report that enhances patient management
    • COM 4.1 Document actions taken to communicate significant or unexpected findings

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-2

    Providing histomorphology reports of bone marrow and hematolymphoid tissue samples

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on interpreting clinical, laboratory, and imaging information, ordering ancillary testing as needed (e.g., immunohistochemistry, molecular, cytogenetic and flow cytometry) and integrating the results into the final diagnosis and report. - It also includes recognizing critical results that require direct communication with the clinical team.

    Direct observation and/or case discussion by supervisor or TTP resident Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Specimen: aspirate/biopsy; lymph node; splenic tissue; other - Type of disease: neoplastic; non-neoplastic - Disorder: acute leukemia; bone marrow failure; lymphoproliferative disorder; myelodysplastic syndrome; myeloproliferative neoplasm; non-hematopoietic diagnosis; other diagnostic category - Diagnosis (write in): - Critical results: yes; no Collect 40 observations of achievement - At least 20 bone marrow aspirate and biopsies - At least 10 lymph nodes - At least 2 splenic tissue - At least 2 other specimens - A range of disorders - At least 4 with critical results requiring communication - At least 5 different observers, at least 4 different hematopathologists

    Suggested observations: 40

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Specimen

    1. aspirate/biopsy
    2. lymph node
    3. splenic tissue
    4. other

    Type of disease

    1. neoplastic
    2. non-neoplastic

    Disorder

    1. acute leukemia
    2. bone marrow failure
    3. lymphoproliferative disorder
    4. myelodysplastic syndrome
    5. myeloproliferative neoplasm
    6. non-hematopoietic diagnosis
    7. other diagnostic category

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Assess the quality of the sample and any impact on the diagnostic interpretation
    • ME 2.2 Perform morphological assessment of a bone marrow and/or hematolymphoid tissue sample
    • ME 2.2 Select and interpret ancillary investigations
    • ME 3.3 Triage investigations, taking into account clinical urgency and available resources
    • ME 2.2 Recognize critical or unexpected findings
    • ME 2.2 Establish a diagnosis that takes into account clinical correlation

    Communicator

    • COM 4.1 Generate a clear, concise report that enhances patient management
    • COM 4.1 Use synoptic and other standardized reporting formats as appropriate
    • COM 4.1 Integrate information from ancillary studies and other sources into the pathology report
    • COM 4.1 Complete pathology reports within appropriate turnaround times
    • COM 4.1 Document actions taken to communicate significant or unexpected findings

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-3

    Providing reports of hemostasis investigations

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA includes triaging specimens for testing, reviewing initial investigations, selecting and interpreting ancillary tests as required, and integrating the results into the final diagnosis and report. - This includes correlating the investigations with the clinical history/bleeding score, family history, medication use, and/or other test results as applicable, and recognizing critical results that require direct communication with the clinical team. - It also includes adherence to quality management and quality assurance guidelines.

    Direct observation, case discussion or review of report by supervisor or TTP resident Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Disorder: inherited coagulation; acquired coagulation; non-specific inhibitor(s); specific inhibitor(s); inherited platelet function disorder; acquired platelet function; inherited thrombophilia; acquired hypercoagulable state; anticoagulant monitoring; other (write-in) - Critical results: yes; no - Demographic: neonate; pediatric; adult - Complex case with multiple testing modalities: yes; no Collect 10 observations of achievement - A variety of disorders - At least 1 thrombotic disorder, inherited or acquired - At least 1 platelet disorder, inherited or acquired - At least 2 critical results - At least 1 neonate - At least 1 complex case with multiple testing methodologies and/or test series - At least 3 different assessors

    Suggested observations: 10

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Disorder

    1. inherited coagulation
    2. acquired coagulation
    3. non-specific inhibitor(s)
    4. specific inhibitor(s)
    5. inherited platelet function disorder
    6. acquired platelet function
    7. inherited thrombophilia
    8. acquired hypercoagulable state
    9. anticoagulant monitoring
    10. other (write-in)

    Critical results

    1. yes
    2. no

    Demographic

    1. neonate
    2. pediatric
    3. adult

    Complex case with multiple testing modalities

    1. yes
    2. no

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Interpret hemostasis investigations
    • ME 1.3 Demonstrate an approach to the diagnosis of bleeding and thrombotic disorders
    • ME 2.2 Select and interpret ancillary investigations
    • ME 3.3 Triage investigations, taking into account clinical urgency and available resources
    • ME 2.2 Establish a diagnosis that takes into account clinical correlation

    Communicator

    • COM 4.1 Generate a clear, concise report that enhances patient management
    • COM 4.1 Integrate information from ancillary studies and other sources into the pathology report
    • COM 4.1 Document actions taken to communicate significant or unexpected findings

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-4

    Providing reports of complex hemoglobinopathies, red cell membrane disorders and enzymopathies

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA includes reviewing initial investigations, identifying complex cases, triaging specimens for testing, selecting and interpreting ancillary tests, and integrating the results into the final diagnosis and report. - Complex investigations are those requiring additional ancillary or non-routine methods of testing. - This EPA includes recognizing critical results that require direct communication with the clinical team. - It also includes adherence to quality management and quality assurance guidelines. - The observation of this EPA is based on a single case. - This EPA may be achieved in simulation.

    Direct observation, case discussion or review of report by supervisor or TTP resident Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Disorder (select all that apply): alpha globin chain variant; beta globin chain variant; enzymopathy; red cell membrane abnormality; other - Diagnosis (write in): - Critical results: yes; no - Demographic: neonate; pediatric; adult Collect 7 observations of achievement - A variety of disorders - At least 1 with more than 1 globin chain affected (co-inheritance) - At least 1 red cell membrane abnormality - At least 1 enzymopathy - At least 1 pediatric or neonatal case - At least 2 different observers

    Suggested observations: 7

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Disorder

    1. alpha globin chain variant
    2. beta globin chain variant
    3. enzymopathy
    4. red cell membrane abnormality
    5. other

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Interpret a hemoglobinopathy investigation
    • ME 2.2 Select and interpret ancillary investigations
    • ME 3.3 Triage investigations, taking into account clinical urgency and available resources
    • ME 2.2 Recognize critical or unexpected findings
    • ME 2.2 Establish a diagnosis that takes into account clinical correlation

    Communicator

    • COM 4.1 Generate a clear, concise report that enhances patient management
    • COM 4.1 Integrate information from ancillary studies and other sources into the pathology report
    • COM 4.1 Document actions taken to communicate significant or unexpected findings

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-5

    Providing reports of flow cytometry testing

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA includes reviewing the clinical request or history, reviewing or integrating morphologic results, triaging specimens for the appropriateness of flow cytometry and panel selection, and integrating the results into the final diagnosis and report. - This includes routine performance of quality control and quality assurance for individual cases.

    Direct observation or case discussion and review of report by supervisor or TTP resident Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Specimen: body fluid; bone marrow; lymph node; peripheral blood; other - Disorder: acute leukemia panel; CD34 enumeration; fetomaternal hemorrhage; immunodeficiency investigation; investigation of platelet disorder; investigation of red cell disorder; lymphoproliferative panel (LPD); paroxsymal nocturnal hemoglobinuria - Demographic: pediatric; adult - Diagnosis (write in): Collect 15 observations of achievement - A variety of specimens - A variety of disorders - At least 1 pediatric case - At least 1 high grade hematolymphoid malignancy - At least 1 reflecting a rare event analysis (e.g., minimal residual disease, PNH) - At least 3 different observers

    Suggested observations: 15

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Specimen

    1. body fluid
    2. bone marrow
    3. lymph node
    4. peripheral blood
    5. other

    Disorder

    1. acute leukemia panel
    2. CD34 enumeration
    3. fetomaternal hemorrhage
    4. immunodeficiency investigation
    5. investigation of platelet disorder
    6. investigation of red cell disorder
    7. lymphoproliferative panel (LPD)
    8. paroxsymal nocturnal hemoglobinuria

    Demographic

    1. pediatric
    2. adult

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Identify patient factors that may affect the method and/or priority of testing
    • ME 3.3 Triage investigations, taking into account clinical urgency and available resources
    • ME 2.2 Interpret flow cytometry investigations
    • ME 2.2 Recognize critical or unexpected findings
    • ME 2.2 Establish a diagnosis that takes into account clinical correlation

    Communicator

    • COM 4.1 Generate a clear, concise report that enhances patient management
    • COM 4.1 Document actions taken to communicate significant or unexpected findings

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-6

    Selecting, and interpreting common genomic and molecular pathology tests

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the role of molecular pathology in hematological pathology practice, and includes in situ hybridization, PCR-based testing, cytogenetics, and next-generation sequencing. - This EPA includes assessing specimen adequacy for molecular testing and ordering appropriate tests, typically after a review of light microscopy, as well as interpreting and integrating the molecular results into the final report in the context of clinical history, specimen type, and other diagnostic results. - This EPA does not include the interpretation of complex raw data (e.g., next- generation sequencing).

    Direct observation and/or case discussion by supervisor or TTP resident Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Specimen: blood/bone marrow; formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue; fresh/frozen tissue; other - Testing modality (select all that apply): fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) /chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH); karyotype; next generation sequencing (NGS); ploidy; polymerase chain reaction (PCR) - Disorder: inherited hemostatic disorder; inherited red cell disorder; lymphoid malignancy; myeloid malignancy; stem cell transplant - Demographic: pediatric; adult Collect 15 observations of achievement - At least 2 each of FFPE tissue, fresh/frozen tissue and blood/bone marrow tissue - At least 3 each of NGS, PCR, karyotype, and FISH/CISH - At least 2 with multiple testing modalities - At least 3 myeloid malignancies - At least 3 lymphoid malignancies - At least 3 inherited disorders, including inherited red cell disorder and inherited hemostatic disorder - At least 1 stem cell transplant - At least 2 pediatric cases

    Suggested observations: 15

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Specimen

    1. blood/bone marrow
    2. formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue
    3. fresh/frozen tissue
    4. other

    Testing modality

    1. fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) /chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH)
    2. karyotype
    3. next generation sequencing (NGS)
    4. ploidy
    5. polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

    Disorder

    1. inherited hemostatic disorder
    2. inherited red cell disorder
    3. lymphoid malignancy
    4. myeloid malignancy
    5. stem cell transplant

    Demographic

    1. pediatric
    2. adult

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Assess specimen adequacy for molecular testing
    • ME 2.2 Correlate prior investigations, including the results of relevant laboratory investigations
    • ME 2.2 Select molecular testing based on the diagnostic possibilities and the relevance and capabilities of available technologies
    • ME 2.2 Interpret molecular diagnostic test results together with available clinical and laboratory data
    • ME 2.2 Establish a diagnosis that takes into account clinical correlation

    Communicator

    • COM 4.1 Generate a clear, concise report that enhances patient management
    • COM 4.1 Integrate molecular results into the laboratory report

    Leader

    • L 2.1 Utilize genetic testing resources effectively to balance costs with potential utility of results

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-7

    Providing consultation to physicians regarding complex blood component requests

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA includes providing advice on transfusion management in complex scenarios. - Examples of complex scenarios include massive transfusion, transplantation, maternal- fetal medicine, requests for rare blood products, and blood shortages. - This includes gathering patient information, performing relevant laboratory investigations, demonstrating awareness of the blood inventory, identifying issues, and applying evidence-based indications. - This may include discussing risks, benefits, and alternatives for blood products with physicians. - Scenarios regarding blood shortages may be achieved in simulation.

    Case review by supervisor, with input from requesting clinician and/or transfusion medicine charge technologist/manager as required Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Demographic: pediatric; adult - Urgency: urgent; non-urgent - Clinical scenario: blood shortage; massive transfusion; maternal-fetal medicine; request for rare blood products; transplantation; other (write-in) Collect 5 observations of achievement - At least 1 of each clinical scenario - At least 2 by hematopathologist - At least 3 different assessors

    Suggested observations: 5

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Demographic

    1. pediatric
    2. adult

    Urgency

    1. urgent
    2. non-urgent

    Clinical scenario

    1. blood shortage
    2. massive transfusion
    3. maternal-fetal medicine
    4. request for rare blood products
    5. transplantation
    6. other (write-in)

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Gather and synthesize patient information to establish the clinical question
    • ME 2.2 Determine the indications for transfusion therapy
    • ME 2.1 Determine the acuity of the issue and the priorities for patient care
    • ME 2.2 Select and interpret advanced serologic and other laboratory investigations
    • ME 2.2 Select the most appropriate blood product
    • ME 2.4 Modify and/or release blood components and products for clinical use

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.3 Work effectively with clinical colleagues to assist in the interpretation of laboratory findings in the clinical context
    • COL 1.3 Support clinical colleagues in the development and implementation of a management plan

    Leader

    • L 2.1 Use clinical judgment to minimize wasteful practices
    • L 2.1 Demonstrate an awareness of blood inventory

    Professional

    • P 3.1 Adhere to regulations governing the safety and surveillance of the blood supply system

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-8

    Investigating and providing advice on transfusion reactions

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA includes providing advice on transfusion reactions in a variety of acute and chronic clinical scenarios and directing the management of transfusion-related adverse events. - Examples include allergic reactions, hemolytic reactions, transfusion transmitted infections, TRALI (transfusion related acute lung injury), and TACO (transfusion associated circulatory overload). - This includes directing lab investigations, including safety and surveillance issues related to the transfusion reaction, and giving advice and recommendations to the clinical team about patient management.

    Direct observation and case review by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Setting: clinical; simulation - Type of transfusion reaction: allergic reaction; febrile reaction; hemolytic reaction; TACO; TRALI; transfusion transmitted infections; other (write in) Collect 8 observations of achievement - At least 1 of each type of transfusion reaction

    Suggested observations: 8

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Setting

    1. clinical
    2. simulation

    Type of transfusion reaction

    1. allergic reaction
    2. febrile reaction
    3. hemolytic reaction
    4. TACO
    5. TRALI
    6. transfusion transmitted infections
    7. other (write in)

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of the principles of investigation and classification of adverse reactions to blood component therapy
    • ME 2.2 Perform a product review
    • ME 2.2 Select and/or interpret investigations
    • ME 2.2 Determine the classification of the adverse reaction to blood component therapy
    • ME 2.4 Establish the probable cause of the adverse reaction to blood component therapy
    • ME 5.1 Report the adverse reaction, completing the relevant documentation

    Communicator

    • COM 2.3 Seek and synthesize clinical history and relevant information from various sources, including the physician(s) involved

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.3 Support clinical colleagues in the development and implementation of a management plan
    • COL 1.3 Work effectively with clinical colleagues to assist in the interpretation of laboratory findings in the clinical context

    Professional

    • P 3.1 Adhere to regulations governing the safety and surveillance of the blood supply system

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-9

    Providing afterhours coverage for a hematological pathology service

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on managing the workload of afterhours hematological pathology, including planning for call, time management, coordinating work with lab personnel, and prioritizing and delegating responsibilities appropriately. - This includes being accessible to requests for diagnostic and consultative services from clinical and lab colleagues, ensuring timely responses to requests, seeking additional help/guidance when needed, and maintaining a professional manner in all interactions. - This includes considerations of laboratory utilization and resource stewardship. - This EPA could be observed in the laboratory (both hematology and transfusion) or a clinical experience. - The observation of this EPA is based on an overnight or weekend on call.

    Direct and indirect observation by on-call supervisor, with input from MLTs and from those initiating a call or request as required. Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Practice domain (select all that apply): core hematology lab; flow cytometry; hemostasis; molecular diagnostics; morphology; red cell investigation; transfusion medicine; other (write in) Collect 5 observations of achievement - At least 3 different practice domains - At least 1 transfusion medicine - At least 2 different assessors

    Suggested observations: 5

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Practice domain

    1. core hematology lab
    2. flow cytometry
    3. hemostasis
    4. molecular diagnostics
    5. morphology
    6. red cell investigation
    7. transfusion medicine
    8. other (write in)

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.1 Gather and synthesize patient information to establish the clinical question

    Collaborator

    • COL 2.1 Respond to requests and feedback in a respectful and timely manner
    • COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with other health care professionals
    • COL 1.3 Support clinical colleagues in the development and implementation of a management plan
    • COL 1.3 Provide guidance and support for questions arising in the laboratory

    Leader

    • L 2.1 Use clinical judgment to allocate resources including investigations, blood products, and staffing

    Health Advocate

    • HA 1.1 Respond to individual patient diagnostic needs and issues as part of patient care

    Scholar

    • S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise into decision-making

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Demonstrate accountability for the delivery of hematological pathology services
    • P 1.1 Work within personal limits, seeking assistance as needed
    • P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviours

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-10

    Presenting hematopathology cases to a variety of audiences

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the hematopathologist’s role in communicating hematological pathology related information to a variety of clinical audiences. - This EPA includes preparing and presenting cases, including a review of relevant literature, responding to clarifying questions from the audience and communicating effectively in rounds, peer review sessions, and teaching presentations. - At this stage, the resident is not yet expected to be the sole source of hematological pathology expertise for the session, discussing nuances and participating in problem– solving related to the case. This is an expectation of the Transition to Practice stage.

    Direct observation by supervisor, TTP resident, or other clinician Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Observer role: hematopathologist; TTP resident; clinician - Type of presentation: departmental rounds; multidisciplinary rounds; peer review; teaching Collect 5 observations of achievement - At least 1 multidisciplinary rounds - At least 2 by staff hematopathologist - At least 1 non-laboratory physician - At least 3 different assessors

    Suggested observations: 5

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Observer role

    1. hematopathologist
    2. TTP resident
    3. clinician

    Type of presentation

    1. departmental rounds
    2. multidisciplinary rounds
    3. peer review
    4. teaching

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.4 Synthesize a case for discussion at interdisciplinary rounds

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.3 Convey information to clinicians in a manner that enhances patient management
    • COL 1.3 Encourage discussion, questions, and interaction relevant to the case
    • COL 2.1 Actively listen to and engage in interactions with members of the interdisciplinary team

    Health Advocate

    • HA 1.1 Respond to individual patient diagnostic needs and issues as part of patient care

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-11

    Developing, monitoring and analyzing quality management activities

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the role of the hematological pathologist as a participant and leader of quality assurance (QA) aspects of laboratory management. - This EPA includes daily quality management and laboratory management activities. - Daily quality management includes process improvement initiatives, reviewing SOPs, and validating new tests/methodologies as well as addressing issues that arise, such as trouble-shooting instrument malfunction or error and reviewing breaches in laboratory quality or safety. - Ongoing routine QA monitoring includes proficiency testing, quality indicators (e.g. turn-around-times), and investigation and management of safety events or laboratory errors.

    Direct observation and/or case discussion by supervisor, head technologist or laboratory manager Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Type of activity: development of critical value protocol; instrument/test validation; instrument troubleshooting; occurrence management; selection and implementation of proficiency testing program; standard operating procedure development; other - Practice domain: core hematology lab; flow cytometry; hemostasis; molecular diagnostics; morphology; red cell investigation; transfusion medicine; other (write in) Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 1 occurrence management activity - At least 3 different activities - At least 2 different practice domains

    Suggested observations: 3

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Type of activity

    1. development of critical value protocol
    2. instrument/test validation
    3. instrument troubleshooting
    4. occurrence management
    5. selection and implementation of proficiency testing program
    6. standard operating procedure development
    7. other

    Practice domain

    1. core hematology lab
    2. flow cytometry
    3. hemostasis
    4. molecular diagnostics
    5. morphology
    6. red cell investigation
    7. transfusion medicine
    8. other (write in)

    Communicator

    • COM 3.2 Convey and document issues arising from a breach in quality or safety of laboratory practices

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.3 Work effectively with individuals responsible for laboratory management and hospital administration

    Leader

    • L 1.4 Apply knowledge of the metrics and measurement systems used to track quality management, utilization, and safety activities
    • L 1.1 Apply knowledge of process improvement methodologies
    • L 3.1 Actively engage laboratory and clinical stakeholders in change management

    Health Advocate

    • HA 2.2 Evaluate laboratory practices and test selection to ensure they meet community needs

    Scholar

    • S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise

    Professional

    • P 1.2 Demonstrate a commitment to continuous quality improvement
    • P 3.1 Fulfil and adhere to the standards regulating laboratory accreditation and practice

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-12

    Conducting scholarly work

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA includes all aspects of performing scholarly work: identification of a question for investigation, literature review, data gathering, data analysis, reflective critique, and dissemination. - The assessment of this EPA is based on the submission of two completed scholarly projects. - Publication is not required for EPA achievement.

    Review of resident submission by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Type of work: educational project; research; quality improvement Collect 2 observation of achievement - At least 1 research project - At least 2 different assessors

    Suggested observations: 2

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Type of work

    1. educational project
    2. research
    3. quality improvement

    Scholar

    • S 4.4 Identify, consult, and collaborate with content experts and others in the conduct of scholarly work
    • S 4.4 Generate a focused question for scholarly investigation
    • S 3.3 Critically evaluate the literature
    • S 4.4 Select appropriate methods of addressing a given scholarly question
    • S 4.2 Identify ethical principles in research
    • S 4.4 Collect data for a scholarly project
    • S 4.4 Perform data analysis
    • S 4.4 Integrate existing literature and findings of data collection
    • S 4.4 Identify areas for further investigation

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

Transition to Practice

  • TTP-1

    Managing the caseload of a hematopathologist

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA includes the timely sign out of comprehensive laboratory reports at the level of junior faculty, managing the workload within expected turnaround times, and performing internal and external consultations. - This includes the integration of evidence-based information into reports and practice. - The observation of this EPA is based on a day’s work.

    Direct observation or case discussion and review of reports by supervisor, with input from MLT and clinicians Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Practice domain (select all that apply): core hematology lab; flow cytometry; hemostasis; molecular diagnostics; morphology; red cell investigation; transfusion medicine; other (write in) - Consult (select all that apply): external; internal - Complexity of case load: low; medium; high - Proficiency testing: yes; no Collect 6 observations of achievement - At least 4 different practice domains - No more than 1 caseload of low complexity - At least 1 caseload of high complexity - At least 2 observations of proficiency testing - At least 3 different assessors

    Suggested observations: 6

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Practice domain

    1. core hematology lab
    2. flow cytometry
    3. hemostasis
    4. molecular diagnostics
    5. morphology
    6. red cell investigation
    7. transfusion medicine
    8. other (write in)

    Consult

    1. external
    2. internal

    Complexity of case load

    1. low
    2. medium
    3. high

    Proficiency testing

    1. yes
    2. no

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.1 Demonstrate a commitment to high-quality care
    • ME 1.5 Set priorities, triage, and manage the workload within accepted turnaround times
    • ME 1.4 Perform timely, accurate diagnostic assessments
    • ME 1.6 Demonstrate insight into one’s own limits of expertise and seek consultation as necessary

    Communicator

    • COM 4.1 Formulate comprehensive and clinically meaningful reports

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.2 Work effectively with other health professionals

    Leader

    • L 3.1 Provide clinical direction of the laboratory
    • L 3.1 Demonstrate knowledge of the principles of laboratory management, including resource allocation and collaboration with technical managers, and hospital and laboratory administration

    Scholar

    • S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise into decision-making

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviours

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTP-2

    Representing Hematological Pathology at multidisciplinary rounds

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the hematopathologist's role within and contributions to the interprofessional team regarding patient care and management. - The EPA includes discussing case specific nuances of pathology diagnosis, including implications for prognosis and treatment, advocating for the patient and participating in problem-solving. - It also includes advocating for the role of pathology as well as seeking peer review and consensus diagnosis where applicable. - This EPA includes cases wherein there are challenges in finding consensus or where there is a requirement for external consultation.

    Multiple observers provide feedback individually, which is then collated to one report Use Form 3. Form collects information on: - Type of rounds (write in): - Observer role: hematopathologist; staff clinician Collect feedback from at least 3 observers on 3 different occasions - At least 1 by staff hematopathologist - At least 2 by staff clinicians

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.4 Present and discuss pathology cases effectively at clinical rounds, in the role of a consultant in pathology
    • ME 1.6 Convey diagnostic uncertainty and recommend additional studies when needed
    • ME 1.6 Demonstrate insight into one’s own limits of expertise and seek consultation as necessary

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.3 Convey information to clinicians in a manner that enhances patient management

    Scholar

    • S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise into decision-making

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviours

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTP-3

    Leading and managing the daily operations of the laboratory

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the management of a hematological pathology service in the role of the physician most responsible for patient care and laboratory oversight, including managing blood transfusion services. - Building on the competencies of the Core stage, this includes application of the knowledge, skills and attitudes expected of an independently practicing pathologist. - This EPA includes coordinating clinical and laboratory services, managing issues related to quality and patient safety events, working effectively with the interprofessional team and completing administrative tasks. - The observation of this EPA is based on a day’s work.

    Direct observation by supervisor with input from other laboratory professionals Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Practice domain: core hematology lab; flow cytometry; hemostasis; molecular diagnostics; morphology; red cell investigation; transfusion medicine; other (write in) Collect 5 observations of achievement - At least 2 different practice domains - At least 2 different assessors

    Suggested observations: 5

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Practice domain

    1. core hematology lab
    2. flow cytometry
    3. hemostasis
    4. molecular diagnostics
    5. morphology
    6. red cell investigation
    7. transfusion medicine
    8. other (write in)

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.1 Demonstrate a commitment to high-quality care
    • ME 1.5 Carry out professional duties in the face of multiple competing demands
    • ME 5.1 Recognize and respond to patient safety events in a timely manner

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.3 Provide guidance and support for questions arising in the laboratory
    • COL 1.3 Provide guidance and support for questions arising from clinical colleagues
    • COL 1.3 Support clinical colleagues in the development and implementation of a management plan

    Leader

    • L 3.1 Work with staff to address personnel, management, and laboratory issues
    • L 2.1 Allocate health care resources for optimal patient care

    Scholar

    • S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise into decision-making

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Work within personal limits, seeking assistance as needed
    • P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviours

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTP-4

    Supervising junior learners

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the informal teaching that occurs as part of usual laboratory activities and includes teaching and providing support and feedback, while ensuring the quality of laboratory practices and reports. - This includes initiating and providing observations of EPAs for junior learners. - This EPA may be observed in daily laboratory activities such as preparing and delivering rounds, clinical consultation, or case sign-out.

    Direct and/or indirect observation by supervisor, with input from the junior learners being supervised Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Junior learner stage (select all that apply): Transition to Discipline; Foundations of Discipline; Core of Discipline - Junior learner discipline (write in): - Activity supervised: clinical; laboratory; rounds preparation Collect 5 observations of achievement - At least 1 supervising rounds preparation - At least 3 different junior learners - At least 3 different assessors

    Suggested observations: 5

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Junior learner stage

    1. Transition to Discipline
    2. Foundations of Discipline
    3. Core of Discipline

    Scholar

    • S 2.2 Create a positive learning environment
    • S 2.3 Supervise learners to ensure they work within their limits, providing guidance and supervision when needed
    • S 2.4 Provide teaching and/or other informal learning activities
    • S 2.5 Provide feedback to enhance learning and performance

    Professional

    • P 3.3 Participate in the assessment of junior learners
    • P 1.1 Intervene when behaviours toward learners undermine a positive learning environment

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.