Skip to content

EPA library

Geriatric Medicine

Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada · 2.0 · 24 EPAs

Also available in French.

Every EPA in the published guide, shown as the form DebriefMD fills in, with its fields and answer options.

Transition to Discipline

  • TTD-1

    Performing the fundamental components of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and identifying common …

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on core components of the CGA: conducting a comprehensive history and physical examination; completing a medication review; documenting the clinical encounter; and identifying common geriatric syndromes. - This EPA also includes performing and scoring cognitive screening using any validated screening tool (e.g., Mini–Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)). - This EPA does not include analyzing and synthesizing diagnoses for common geriatric syndromes. - The observation of this EPA is divided into two parts: performing a CGA; and screening for cognitive impairment.

    Part A: Performing a CGA Direct observation by supervisor with case discussion Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Case presentation (select all that apply): cognitive impairment; mood disorders; functional impairment/decline; frailty/multicomplexity; mobility/falls/gait disorders; bone health; orthostatic hypotension; dizziness; sarcopenia and deconditioning; incontinence; weight loss and optimal nutrition; optimal prescribing; pressure ulcers/injuries; driving safety awareness - Setting: inpatient consult; geriatric unit; outpatient clinic; day hospital; outreach - Supervisor role: geriatrician; TTP resident; care of the elderly physician Collect 1 observation of achievement Part B: Screening for cognitive impairment Direct observation by supervisor with case discussion Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Assessment tool: MMSE; MoCA; other - Supervisor role: geriatrician; TTP resident; care of the elderly physician; psychiatrist; neurologist; occupational therapist; advanced practice nurse Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 1 direct observation of at least 2 different validated cognitive screening tools - At least 2 assessors

    Suggested observations: 1

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Case presentation

    1. cognitive impairment
    2. mood disorders
    3. functional impairment/decline
    4. frailty/multicomplexity
    5. mobility/falls/gait disorders
    6. bone health
    7. orthostatic hypotension
    8. dizziness
    9. sarcopenia and deconditioning
    10. incontinence
    11. weight loss and optimal nutrition
    12. optimal prescribing
    13. pressure ulcers/injuries
    14. driving safety awareness

    Setting

    1. inpatient consult
    2. geriatric unit
    3. outpatient clinic
    4. day hospital
    5. outreach

    Supervisor role

    1. geriatrician
    2. TTP resident
    3. care of the elderly physician

    Medical Expert

    • Part A: ME 2.2 Elicit an accurate, relevant comprehensive history including functional, medication and social history
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Perform a physical examination at the level of an internist, including a comprehensive musculoskeletal and neurological examination, targeted to the presentation
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Identify frailty, cognitive impairment, mood disorders, and/or functional impairment
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Synthesize and organize clinical information for clear and succinct presentation to supervisor
    • Part B: ME 2.2 Complete and score all required elements of a validated cognitive assessment tool

    Communicator

    • Part A: COM 1.2 Optimize the physical environment for patient comfort, dignity, privacy, engagement, and safety
    • Part A: COM 1.1 Communicate using a patient-centred approach that facilitates patient trust and autonomy and is characterized by empathy, respect, and compassion
    • Part A: COM 2.3 Seek and summarize relevant information from other sources, including the patient’s family, and medical records
    • Part A: COM 5.1 Organize the clinical information from a CGA within a written document
    • Part A: COM 5.1 Document information about patients and their medical conditions in a manner that enhances interprofessional care
    • Part B: COM 1.2 Optimize the physical environment for patient comfort, dignity, privacy, engagement, and safety
    • Part B: COM 1.1 Communicate using a patient-centred approach that facilitates patient trust and autonomy and is characterized by empathy, respect, and compassion
    • Part B: COM 5.1 Document information about patients and their medical conditions in a manner that enhances interprofessional care

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTD-2

    Assessing and managing older patients with common medical conditions

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA verifies skills attained in Internal Medicine and includes assessing and managing medical conditions, prioritizing patient acuity, using appropriate diagnostic tests, and communicating with patients and family members (oral and written). - This EPA can be observed in any clinical setting and requires direct observation on at least one occasion.

    Direct and/or indirect observation by geriatrician or TTP resident Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Condition(s) (write in): - Setting: geriatric unit; inpatient consult; outpatient clinic; day hospital; geriatric rehabilitation unit; after-hours coverage; other - Type of observation: direct; indirect Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 different medical conditions - At least 1 direct observation

    Suggested observations: 2

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.5 Prioritize patients based on the urgency of clinical presentation
    • ME 1.4 Recognize problems that may need the involvement of more experienced colleagues and seek their assistance
    • ME 1.4 Perform complete and appropriate assessments of older patients with common internal medicine presentations
    • ME 2.2 Interpret the results of investigations and develop a differential diagnosis relevant to the patient’s presentation
    • ME 2.2 Select additional investigations as appropriate
    • ME 1.3 Apply clinical and biomedical sciences to manage older adult patients with internal medicine presentations
    • ME 2.4 Develop and implement management plans for older adults with common internal medicine conditions
    • ME 2.4 Determine appropriate patient disposition, which may include admission, referral or follow-up
    • ME 3.4 Seek assistance as needed when unanticipated findings or changing clinical circumstances are encountered
    • ME 2.2 Synthesize and organize clinical information for clear and succinct presentation to supervisor

    Communicator

    • COM 5.1 Organize the clinical information from a CGA within a written document
    • COM 3.1 Convey the diagnosis, prognosis, and plan of care in a clear, compassionate, respectful, and accurate manner
    • COM 4.3 Answer questions from the patient and family about next steps
    • COM 5.1 Document clinical encounters to convey clinical reasoning and the rationale for decisions

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.1 Receive and appropriately respond to input from other health care professionals

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Complete assigned responsibilities

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

Foundations

  • F-1

    Performing comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGA)

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on all components of the CGA, including analyzing and synthesizing diagnoses for common geriatric syndromes. - This EPA also includes: incorporating medical and interprofessional team input; comprehensive care planning; awareness of community services, living environments and programs; identifying issues related to transitions of care, goals of care, discharge planning, and rehabilitation potential.

    Direct observation or case review by supervisor Use Form 1 and STACER ∗. Form collects information on: - Case presentation (select all that apply): cognitive impairment; mood disorders; functional impairment/decline; frailty/multicomplexity; mobility/falls/gait disorders; bone health; orthostatic hypotension; dizziness; sarcopenia and deconditioning; incontinence; weight loss and optimal nutrition; optimal prescribing; pressure ulcers/injuries; driving safety awareness - Type of observation: direct; indirect - Setting: inpatient; outpatient Collect 5 observations of achievement - At least 3 different case presentations - At least 1 direct observation using a CGA STACER - At least 1 inpatient - At least 1 outpatient - At least 2 assessors

    Suggested observations: 5

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Case presentation

    1. cognitive impairment
    2. mood disorders
    3. functional impairment/decline
    4. frailty/multicomplexity
    5. mobility/falls/gait disorders
    6. bone health
    7. orthostatic hypotension
    8. dizziness
    9. sarcopenia and deconditioning
    10. incontinence
    11. weight loss and optimal nutrition
    12. optimal prescribing
    13. pressure ulcers/injuries
    14. driving safety awareness

    Type of observation

    1. direct
    2. indirect

    Setting

    1. inpatient
    2. outpatient

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.4 Identify, diagnose, and address common geriatric syndromes
    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of clinical pharmacology as it pertains to drug prescribing in common geriatric syndromes
    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of optimal nutrition as it pertains to older adult patients
    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of driving safety awareness as it pertains to older adult patients ∗ STACER is not available on ePortfolio platform
    • ME 2.2 Elicit an accurate, relevant, and comprehensive history, including the components of a comprehensive geriatric assessment such as function and nutrition
    • ME 2.2 Perform a physical examination at the level of a geriatrician that informs the diagnosis, including screening for vision, hearing, gait, and balance
    • ME 2.2 Perform a mental status assessment, including the use of recognized cognitive/mental screening tools
    • ME 2.2 Develop a specific differential diagnosis relevant to the patient’s presentation
    • ME 2.2 Synthesize patient information, incorporating caregiver and interprofessional team input, to determine a diagnosis
    • ME 2.4 Develop a preliminary management plan
    • ME 2.3 Establish goals of care that take into consideration the level of caregiver stress when applicable
    • ME 4.1 Develop and prioritize well-defined questions to be addressed with a medical and interprofessional team
    • ME 5.2 Reconcile current and prior medication lists to enhance patient safety

    Communicator

    • COM 2.3 Seek and synthesize relevant information from other sources, including the patient’s family, with the patient’s consent
    • COM 5.1 Document clinical encounters to convey clinical reasoning and the rationale for decisions
    • COM 5.1 Document information about patients and their medical conditions in a manner that enhances interprofessional care

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.2 Consult as needed with other health care professionals, including other physicians
    • COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with physicians and other health care professionals

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-2

    Diagnosing and managing frail older patients with multiple common medical conditions

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on demonstrating a comprehensive history and physical examination, and collaborating with other specialties or other treating physicians in the management of common medical conditions. - This EPA also includes identifying normal aging vs disease states, interpreting labs and imaging results in context of age, and identifying the effects of multicomplexity and frailty. - This EPA includes patients with typical and atypical presentations of acute and chronic conditions.

    Direct or indirect observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Case mix (select all that apply): hypertension; coronary artery disease; CHF; arrhythmia; stroke; diabetes; chronic kidney disease; anemia; Parkinson’s Disease; movement disorders; COPD; pain; osteoporosis; gout; osteoarthritis; polymyalgia rheumatica; spinal stenosis; infections; thromboembolic disease; common rheumatological conditions; other - Observation: direct; indirect - Setting: inpatient consult; geriatric unit; outpatient clinic; day hospital; collaborative geriatric specialty services - Supervisor: geriatrician; TTP resident Collect 5 observations of achievement - At least 4 different case mixes - At least 2 direct observations - At least 2 settings - At least 3 by a geriatrician

    Suggested observations: 5

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Case mix

    1. hypertension
    2. coronary artery disease
    3. CHF
    4. arrhythmia
    5. stroke
    6. diabetes
    7. chronic kidney disease
    8. anemia
    9. Parkinson’s Disease
    10. movement disorders
    11. COPD
    12. pain
    13. osteoporosis
    14. gout
    15. osteoarthritis
    16. polymyalgia rheumatica
    17. spinal stenosis
    18. infections
    19. thromboembolic disease
    20. common rheumatological conditions
    21. other

    Observation

    1. direct
    2. indirect

    Setting

    1. inpatient consult
    2. geriatric unit
    3. outpatient clinic
    4. day hospital
    5. collaborative geriatric specialty services

    Supervisor

    1. geriatrician
    2. TTP resident

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.6 Provide evidence-informed, patient-centred care of a medical condition in the context of frailty and multicomplexity and its impact on the patient
    • ME 2.2 Perform a comprehensive physical examination tailored to the patient’s presentation
    • ME 1.4 Perform clinical assessments that identify and differentiate between normal aging and disease states
    • ME 2.2 Select and interpret appropriate investigations as they apply in the context of age
    • ME 1.3 Apply clinical and biomedical sciences to manage patients with typical and atypical presentations of acute and chronic geriatric syndromes
    • ME 2.4 Evaluate the applicability of clinical guidelines in the context of co- morbidities, aging and patient goals
    • ME 2.4 Develop and implement management plans in collaboration with the patient and family and the interprofessional team

    Communicator

    • COM 1.1 Communicate using a patient-centred approach that facilitates patient trust and autonomy and is characterized by empathy, respect, and compassion
    • COM 3.1 Convey information related to the patient’s health status, care, and needs in a timely, honest, and transparent manner
    • COM 5.1 Document information about patients and their medical conditions in a manner that enhances interprofessional care

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.2 Consult as needed with other health care professionals, including other physicians
    • COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with physicians and other health care professionals
    • COL 1.3 Provide timely and necessary written information to colleagues to enable effective relationship-centred care

    Health Advocate

    • HA 1.3 Work with the patient and family to identify opportunities for disease prevention, health promotion, and health protection

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-3

    Selecting, performing, and interpreting assessments of cognition

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on selecting the most appropriate cognitive assessment tool in the context of the patient’s presentation, performing the assessment, documenting the encounter, and interpreting the findings. - This EPA requires the use of a validated cognitive assessment tool such as: MMSE, MOCA; FAB; Boston naming test, trials A and B; Clock Drawing test; ToCA; SLUMS.

    Direct observation by supervisor with case discussion Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Assessment tool: MMSE; MOCA; FAB; Boston; Clock Drawing test; IQCODE; ToCA; SLUMS; other - Setting: inpatient; outpatient - Supervisor: geriatrician; TTP resident; care of the elderly physician Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 2 different tools other than MMSE and MOCA - At least 2 assessors

    Suggested observations: 3

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Assessment tool

    1. MMSE
    2. MOCA
    3. FAB
    4. Boston
    5. Clock Drawing test
    6. IQCODE
    7. ToCA
    8. SLUMS
    9. other

    Setting

    1. inpatient
    2. outpatient

    Supervisor

    1. geriatrician
    2. TTP resident
    3. care of the elderly physician

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Identify frailty, cognitive impairment, mood disorders and/or functional impairment
    • ME 2.2 Complete and score all required elements of the assessment according to guidelines
    • ME 2.2 Synthesize and organize clinical information for clear and succinct presentation to supervisor

    Communicator

    • COM 1.2 Optimize the physical environment for patient comfort, dignity, privacy, engagement, and safety
    • COM 1.1 Communicate using a patient-centred approach that facilitates patient trust and autonomy and is characterized by empathy, respect, and compassion
    • COM 2.3 Seek and summarize relevant information from other sources, including the patient’s family, and medical records
    • COM 5.1 Organize the information from an assessment within a written document
    • COM 5.1 Document information about patients and their medical conditions in a manner that enhances interprofessional care

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-4

    Assessing, diagnosing and managing patients with common neurocognitive disorders with typical presentations

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the initial assessment and diagnosis of patients with common neurocognitive disorders but does not include patients with delirium or behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). - This EPA includes performing and interpreting a cognitive assessment, physical examination and investigations, communicating diagnosis and prognosis, identifying potentially modifiable conditions, and recognizing the need for neuropsychological testing. - This EPA also includes managing patients with pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatment options, utilizing community support programs, demonstrating awareness of medico-legal aspects, and future planning. - The observation of this EPA is divided into three parts: assessment; communication with patient and/or caregiver; and management. - The cognitive assessment and management aspects of this EPA may be observed in simulation.

    Part A: Assessment Direct observation or case review by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Presentation: mild cognitive impairment (MCI); Alzheimer’s; vascular dementia; mixed cause dementia; Lewy body dementia - Supervisor: geriatrician; psychiatrist; neurologist; care of the elderly physician - Setting: clinical; simulation Collect 6 observations of achievement - At least 3 different presentations - No more than 2 observed in simulation - At least 3 by a geriatrician Part B: Communication with patient/caregiver Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Communication scenarios (select all that apply): counselling on treatment options; diagnosis; driving risk; home safety risk; management of finances; other safety issue(s) - Supervisor: geriatrician; psychiatrist; neurologist; care of the elderly physician - Setting: inpatient; outpatient Collect 5 observations of achievement - At least 2 observations of communicating diagnosis and counselling on treatment options - At least 2 observations of any of the following types of communication: home safety, management of finances, or other safety issues - At least 1 communication of driving risk - At least 2 observations by a geriatrician Part C: Management Direct or indirect observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Presentation: mild cognitive impairment; Alzheimer’s; vascular dementia; mixed cause dementia; Lewy body dementia - Supervisor role: geriatrician; psychiatrist; neurologist; care of the elderly physician - Setting: inpatient; outpatient; simulation Collect 5 observations of achievement - At least 3 different presentations - At least 4 in clinical setting - At least 2 observations by a geriatrician

    Suggested observations: 6

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Presentation

    1. mild cognitive impairment (MCI)
    2. Alzheimer’s
    3. vascular dementia
    4. mixed cause dementia
    5. Lewy body dementia

    Supervisor

    1. geriatrician
    2. psychiatrist
    3. neurologist
    4. care of the elderly physician

    Setting

    1. clinical
    2. simulation

    Medical Expert

    • Part A: ME 1.4 Perform a focused clinical and cognitive assessment appropriate to the patient presentation
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Identify patients who require neuropsychological testing
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Select additional investigations as appropriate
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Synthesize patient information, incorporating caregiver and interprofessional team input, to determine a diagnosis
    • Part C: ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of clinical pharmacology as it pertains to drug prescribing in common neurocognitive disorders with typical presentations
    • Part C: ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of clinical sciences as it pertains to non-pharmacologic treatment options
    • Part C: ME 1.6 Recognize and respond to the complexity, uncertainty, and ambiguity inherent in medical practice
    • Part C: ME 1.6 Adapt care as the complexity, uncertainty, and ambiguity of the patient’s condition evolves
    • Part C: ME 2.4 Develop and implement initial management plans for common neurocognitive disorders
    • Part C: ME 4.1 Establish plans for ongoing care, taking into consideration the patient’s clinical state, circumstances, preferences, and actions, as well as available resources, best practices, and research evidence
    • Part C: ME 2.4 Integrate knowledge of available community resources into the development of patient-centred care plans

    Communicator

    • Part B: COM 1.1 Communicate using a patient-centred approach that facilitates patient trust and autonomy and is characterized by empathy, respect, and compassion
    • Part B: COM 3.1 Convey sensitive information regarding driving, cognition and other safety concerns clearly and compassionately
    • Part B: COM 1.5 Recognize when strong emotions are impacting an interaction and respond appropriately
    • Part B: COM 3.1 Convey information related to the patient’s health status, care, and needs in a timely, honest, and transparent manner
    • Part B: COM 4.1 Communicate with cultural awareness and sensitivity
    • Part B: COM 4.3 Answer questions from the patient and family about next steps
    • Part B: COM 5.1 Document clinical encounters to convey clinical reasoning and the rationale for decisions

    Leader

    • Part C: L 2.1 Apply knowledge of the resources available in the care setting when developing and implementing management plans
    • Part C: L 2.1 Apply knowledge of resources or agencies that address the health needs of older patients presenting with neurocognitive disorders

    Professional

    • Part B: P 3.1 Adhere to professional and ethical codes, standards of practice, and laws governing practice, especially as they relate to driving safety

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-5

    Diagnosing and initiating management of patients in delirium

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the diagnosis and initial management of delirium through the use of validated delirium screening tools, and the communication of diagnosis. - This EPA does not include prevention or pharmacologic management. - The observation of this EPA is divided into three parts: diagnosis; communication; and initiating management.

    Part A: Diagnosis Direct or indirect observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Presentation: hyperactive (i.e., agitated); hypoactive; mixed - Setting: geriatric unit; inpatient consult; pre- and/or post-operative setting; emergency room; day hospital; residential care; other - Supervisor: geriatrician; care of the elderly physician Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 2 different presentations - At least 2 settings - At least 2 by a geriatrician Part B: Communication with family/care provider Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Presentation: hyperactive (i.e., agitated); hypoactive; mixed - Setting: geriatric unit; inpatient consult; pre- and/or post-operative setting; emergency room; day hospital; residential care; other - Supervisor: geriatrician; care of the elderly physician Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 different presentations - At least 2 settings - At least 2 different assessors Part C: Initiate management Case review with supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Presentation: hyperactive (i.e., agitated); hypoactive; mixed - Setting: geriatric unit; inpatient consult; pre- and/or post-operative setting; emergency room; day hospital; residential care; other - Supervisor: geriatrician; care of the elderly physician Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 2 different presentations - At least 2 settings - At least 2 by a geriatrician

    Suggested observations: 3

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Presentation

    1. hyperactive (i.e., agitated)
    2. hypoactive
    3. mixed

    Setting

    1. geriatric unit
    2. inpatient consult
    3. pre- and/or post-operative setting
    4. emergency room
    5. day hospital
    6. residential care
    7. other

    Supervisor

    1. geriatrician
    2. care of the elderly physician

    Medical Expert

    • Part A: ME 1.3 Apply clinical and biomedical sciences to the diagnosis and/or management of delirium
    • Part A: ME 1.4 Perform focused clinical assessments, including appropriate history, physical examination, medication review and investigations
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Identify patients who require delirium screening
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Select additional investigations as appropriate
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Synthesize patient information, incorporating caregiver and interprofessional team input, to determine a diagnosis
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Perform a delirium screen using validated tools
    • Part C: ME 1.3 Apply clinical and biomedical sciences to the diagnosis and/or management of delirium
    • Part C: ME 2.2 Select and interpret appropriate investigations as they apply in the context of delirium
    • Part C: ME 2.4 Develop and implement initial management plans for patients in delirium
    • Part C: ME 2.4 Integrate knowledge of available community resources into the development of patient-centred care plans

    Communicator

    • Part B: COM 1.1 Communicate using a patient-centred approach that facilitates patient trust and autonomy and is characterized by empathy, respect, and compassion
    • Part B: COM 3.1 Convey sensitive information regarding cognition and delirium clearly and compassionately
    • Part B: COM 1.4 Respond to patient’s non-verbal communication and use appropriate non-verbal behaviours to enhance communication
    • Part B: COM 3.1 Provide information on diagnosis and prognosis in a clear, compassionate, respectful, and objective manner
    • Part B: COM 5.1 Document information about patients and their medical conditions in a manner that enhances interprofessional care
    • Part C: COM 1.6 Adapt to the unique needs of patients in delirium and to their clinical condition and circumstances
    • Part C: COM 3.1 Convey information related to the patient’s health status, care, and needs in a timely, honest, and transparent manner
    • Part C: COM 5.1 Document information about patients and their medical conditions in a manner that enhances interprofessional care

    Leader

    • Part C: L 2.1 Apply knowledge of the resources available in the care setting when developing and implementing management plans

    Health Advocate

    • Part C: HA 1.2 Work with patients and their families to increase opportunities to adopt healthy behaviours

    Professional

    • Part B: P 3.1 Adhere to professional and ethical codes, standards of practice, and laws governing practice

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-6

    Identifying issues with medication use and making suggestions for optimal prescribing

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on obtaining an accurate medication history, medication review and reconciliation, including recommendations for optimal prescribing and feasible management suggestions (e.g., deprescribing, drug, dose, formulation alternatives). - This EPA includes awareness of the factors and limitations of the best possible medication history generated by other professionals, as well as limitations of the extrapolation of clinical trial data and clinical practice guidelines to the frail elderly. - This EPA also includes understanding and incorporating patient goals and values in medication management decisions.

    Case presentation and review with supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Case mix (select all that apply): renal dysfunction; delirium; dementia; multiple morbidity; multiple medications; falls; orthostatic hypotension; functional decline; other - Supervisor: geriatrician; geriatric pharmacist; care of elderly physician - Setting: inpatient; outpatient Collect 5 observations of achievement - At least 2 inpatient - At least 1 outpatient - At least 2 observations by a geriatrician - At least 2 different assessors

    Suggested observations: 5

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Case mix

    1. renal dysfunction
    2. delirium
    3. dementia
    4. multiple morbidity
    5. multiple medications
    6. falls
    7. orthostatic hypotension
    8. functional decline
    9. other

    Supervisor

    1. geriatrician
    2. geriatric pharmacist
    3. care of elderly physician

    Setting

    1. inpatient
    2. outpatient

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Perform a full medication history assessment and reconciliation
    • ME 2.2 Identify potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), adverse drug reactions (ADRs), prescribing cascades, and time to benefit (TTB)
    • ME 3.1 Describe the indications, contraindications, risks, and alternatives for given treatment prescriptions
    • ME 3.1 Ascertain the efficacy of prescribed treatment in the context of the patient’s presentation
    • ME 4.1 Determine the necessity and timing of referral to another health care professional
    • ME 3.1 Determine the most appropriate procedures and therapies
    • ME 2.4 Evaluate the applicability and/or limitations of the extrapolation of clinical trial data and/or clinical practice guidelines to older adults
    • ME 4.1 Establish plans for monitoring the patient and treatment efficacy
    • ME 2.4 Provide and/or adjust treatment prescriptions considering the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, adherence, and cost issues

    Communicator

    • COM 4.1 Explore the perspectives of the patient and others when developing care plans in the context of prescribing and deprescribing

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.2 Consult as needed with other health care professionals, including other physicians and pharmacists
    • COL 1.3 Engage in respectful shared decision-making with other physicians and/or health care professionals

    Leader

    • L 2.1 Demonstrate stewardship of health care resources

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-7

    Assessing and managing patients with a fall risk

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on managing fall risk by performing appropriate neurologic and musculoskeletal examinations and gait analysis and prescribing simple gait aids. - This EPA includes using and interpreting appropriate fall risk and balance assessments such as gait speed, Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. It also includes a comprehensive assessment of modifiable and non- modifiable extrinsic and intrinsic risk factors to guide fall risk management and integrating the assessments of interprofessional team members. - The observation of this EPA is divided into two parts: gait analysis and balance assessment; fall risk assessment and management. - Gait analysis and balance may be observed in a simulation setting.

    Part A: Gait analysis and balance assessment Direct observation by supervisor, which may include input from physiotherapist or occupational therapist Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Case mix (select all that apply): movement disorders; MSK disorders; sensory impairment; cerebellar/ataxic; NPH; vascular (stroke/subcortical); orthostatic hypotension; multiple medications; cognitive impairment; other - Supervisor: geriatrician; care of the elderly physician; physiatrist; neurologist - Setting: inpatient unit; day hospital; outpatient clinic; inpatient consult; rehabilitation unit; home visit; simulation Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 1 movement disorder - No more than 1 in simulation setting - At least 1 by a geriatrician Part B: Falls risk assessment and management Direct and/or indirect observation by supervisor, which may include input from physiotherapist or occupational therapist Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Case mix (select all that apply): movement disorders; MSK disorders; sensory impairment; cerebellar/ataxic; NPH; vascular (stroke/subcortical); orthostatic hypotension; multiple medications; cognitive impairment; other - Setting: inpatient unit; day hospital; outpatient clinic; inpatient consult; rehabilitation unit; home visit - Supervisor role: geriatrician; care of the elderly physician; physiatrist; neurologist Collect 5 observations of achievement - At least 1 movement disorder - At least 1 orthostatic hypotension - At least 2 by a geriatrician

    Suggested observations: 3

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Case mix

    1. movement disorders
    2. MSK disorders
    3. sensory impairment
    4. cerebellar/ataxic
    5. NPH
    6. vascular (stroke/subcortical)
    7. orthostatic hypotension
    8. multiple medications
    9. cognitive impairment
    10. other

    Supervisor

    1. geriatrician
    2. care of the elderly physician
    3. physiatrist
    4. neurologist

    Setting

    1. inpatient unit
    2. day hospital
    3. outpatient clinic
    4. inpatient consult
    5. rehabilitation unit
    6. home visit
    7. simulation

    Medical Expert

    • Part A: ME 2.2 Perform an MSK examination appropriate to the patient presentation
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Perform a neurological examination appropriate to the patient presentation
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Perform gait analysis and balance assessment including a description of the patient’s gait using a systematic approach
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Interpret the results of gait and balance screening tools including gait speed, BBS, and TUG test
    • Part B: ME 1.4 Perform falls risk assessments, including a comprehensive assessment of extrinsic and intrinsic risk factors that may lead to falls in older adults
    • Part B: ME 2.2 Select and interpret appropriate investigations based on the patient’s presentation
    • Part B: ME 2.4 Develop and implement a management plan for falls
    • Part B: ME 2.4 Prescribe appropriate simple gait aids (e.g. cane, walker)

    Communicator

    • Part B: COM 3.1 Convey information on diagnosis and prognosis related to falls risk clearly and compassionately to the patient and caregivers

    Collaborator

    • Part A: COL 1.1 Respond appropriately to input from other health care professionals as it relates to balance and gait
    • Part A: COL 1.2 Make effective use of the scope and expertise of other health care professionals
    • Part B: COL 1.1 Respond appropriately to input from other health care professionals as it relates to balance and gait
    • Part B: COL 1.2 Make effective use of the scope and expertise of other health care professionals
    • Part B: COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with physicians and other health care professionals

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-8

    Teaching and supervising junior learners

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on evidence-informed practice and teaching skills. - This EPA includes topics such as the components of a CGA and common geriatric syndromes and can be assessed in any setting involving junior learners. - This EPA also includes workplace-based supervision and educational activities, bedside teaching and small group formal teaching. - This EPA does not include formal presentations (e.g., journal clubs, academic half day, grand rounds).

    Direct observation by supervisor, incorporating junior learner feedback Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Setting (write in): Collect 2 observations of achievement

    Suggested observations: 2

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Collaborator

    • COL 2.1 Delegate tasks and responsibilities in an appropriate and respectful manner

    Scholar

    • S 2.1 Be a positive role model
    • S 2.2 Create a positive learning environment
    • S 2.3 Provide opportunities for appropriate graded clinical responsibility
    • S 2.3 Be available and accessible to junior learners
    • S 2.4 Identify the learning needs and desired learning outcomes of others
    • S 2.4 Develop learning objectives for a teaching activity
    • S 2.4 Present the information in an organized manner to facilitate understanding
    • S 2.4 Provide adequate time for questions and discussion
    • S 2.5 Provide feedback to enhance learning and performance
    • S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise into decision-making

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Intervene when behaviours toward colleagues and/or learners undermine a respectful environment

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

Core

  • C-1

    Managing older adults with functional decline using comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA builds on the competencies of the Foundations stage to focus on generating a feasible management plan using CGA, including communicating prognosis, care planning, and managing transitions of care. - This EPA includes creating a prioritized problem list with a patient- and/or family- centred management plan that projects functional status trajectory of , and assesses for, rehabilitative potential. - The observation of this EPA includes the completion of a CGA STACER ∗ and is divided into three parts: management plan; communication with patient and family; communication with referring source.

    Part A: Management plan Indirect observation by geriatrician Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Case presentation: cognitive impairment; mood disorders; functional impairment/decline; frailty/multicomplexity; mobility/falls/gait disorders; bone health; orthostatic hypotension; dizziness; sarcopenia and deconditioning; incontinence; weight loss and optimal nutrition; optimal prescribing; pressure ulcers/injuries; driving safety awareness - Assessment of rehabilitative potential: yes; no - Setting: inpatient consult; geriatric unit; outpatient clinic; day hospital; outreach Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 3 different case presentations - At least 1 assessment of rehabilitative potential - At least 2 different settings - At least 2 different assessors Part B: Communication with patient and family Direct observation by geriatrician, including discussion with the patient and their family ∗ STACER is not available on ePortfolio platform Use Form 1 and CGA STACER Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 different assessors - At least 1 with CGA STACER Part C: Communication with referring source Direct or indirect observation by geriatrician Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Communication type: verbal communication; consultation letter Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 2 consultation letters - At least 2 assessors

    Suggested observations: 3

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Case presentation

    1. cognitive impairment
    2. mood disorders
    3. functional impairment/decline
    4. frailty/multicomplexity
    5. mobility/falls/gait disorders
    6. bone health
    7. orthostatic hypotension
    8. dizziness
    9. sarcopenia and deconditioning
    10. incontinence
    11. weight loss and optimal nutrition
    12. optimal prescribing
    13. pressure ulcers/injuries
    14. driving safety awareness

    Assessment of rehabilitative potential

    1. yes
    2. no

    Setting

    1. inpatient consult
    2. geriatric unit
    3. outpatient clinic
    4. day hospital
    5. outreach

    Medical Expert

    • Part A: ME 1.3 Apply clinical and biomedical sciences to manage common syndromes and/or issues in older adults
    • Part A: ME 1.4 Perform comprehensive geriatric assessments that address all relevant issues
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Perform medication reviews
    • Part A: ME 2.1 Prioritize which issues need to be addressed during future visits
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Select and/or interpret appropriate investigations
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Synthesize patient information, incorporating caregiver and interprofessional team input, to determine a diagnosis
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Assess patients for rehabilitative potential
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Assess and project functional status trajectory for older adults with common syndromes and/or issues
    • Part A: ME 2.4 Establish a patient-centred management plan informed by comprehensive geriatric assessment
    • Part A: ME 2.4 Integrate optimal prescription practices into management plan
    • Part A: ME 4.1 Determine the necessity and timing of referral to another health care professional

    Communicator

    • Part B: COM 1.1 Communicate using a patient-centred approach that facilitates patient trust and autonomy and is characterized by empathy, respect, and compassion
    • Part B: COM 3.1 Share information and explanations that are clear and accurate while checking for patient and family understanding
    • Part B: COM 4.3 Answer questions from the patient and family about next steps
    • Part C: COM 5.1 Document clinical encounters in an accurate, complete, timely and accessible manner that enhances interprofessional care, and is in compliance with legal and privacy requirements
    • Part C: COM 5.2 Communicate effectively using a written health record, electronic medical record, or other digital technology

    Collaborator

    • Part C: COL 1.3 Engage in respectful shared decision-making with primary and/or referring physicians and other health care professionals

    Health Advocate

    • Part A: HA 1.2 Incorporate disease prevention and health promotion into interactions with individual patients, as applicable

    Scholar

    • Part A: S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise into decision-making

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-2

    Managing older adults with multiple co-morbidities across the spectrum of frailty

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on developing an individualized management plan, demonstrating knowledge of a wide variety of interacting medical conditions common in older adults, and projecting trajectory of illness and care needs. - In addition to conducting a CGA, this EPA includes integrating the degree of frailty using a validated frailty assessment tool, performing advanced medication reviews, applying optimal prescribing and deprescribing practices, and recommending health promotion as applicable. - This EPA may be observed across multiple clinical settings, including collaborative geriatric specialty services.

    Case discussions with supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Case mix (select all that apply) hypertension; coronary artery disease; CHF; arrhythmia; stroke; diabetes; chronic kidney disease; anemia; Parkinson’s Disease; movement disorders; COPD; pain; osteoporosis; gout; osteoarthritis; polymyalgia rheumatica; spinal stenosis; infections; thromboembolic disease; common rheumatological conditions; other - Frailty: mild; moderate; severe - Multiple co-morbidities: yes; no - Setting: inpatient consult; geriatric unit; outpatient clinic; day hospital; geriatric oncology service; trauma service; hip fracture service; transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) service; pre-operative assessment service Collect 5 observations of achievement - A variety of case mix - At least 1 patient with moderate or severe frailty - At least 2 different settings

    Suggested observations: 5

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.3 Apply a broad base and depth of knowledge in clinical and biomedical sciences to manage the breadth of patient presentations across the spectrum of frailty including multiple complex interacting comorbidities
    • ME 2.1 Iteratively establish priorities, considering the perspective of the patient and family as the patient’s situation evolves
    • ME 2.2 Project the trajectory of illness and care needs
    • ME 2.2 Integrate new findings and changing clinical circumstances into the assessment of the patient’s clinical status
    • ME 2.2 Perform medication reviews
    • ME 2.4 Establish a patient-centred management plan informed by comprehensive geriatric assessment
    • ME 2.4 Develop, in collaboration with the patient and family, a plan to deal with clinical uncertainty
    • ME 2.4 Integrate the results of a frailty assessment to develop a management plan that is safe, patient-centred, and considers the risks and benefits of all approaches
    • ME 3.3 Balance risk, effectiveness and priority of interventions in the presence of multiple co-morbidities

    Communicator

    • COM 3.1 Share information and explanations that are clear and accurate while checking for patient and family understanding
    • COM 3.1 Convey information related to the patient’s health status, care, and needs in a timely, honest, and transparent manner

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.3 Engage in respectful shared decision-making with other physicians and/or health care professionals

    Health Advocate

    • HA 1.2 Incorporate disease prevention and health promotion into interactions with individual patients, as applicable

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-3

    Determining patients’ capacity for decision-making

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on assessing frail older adults’ capacity to assign a substitute decision maker and to decide about personal care and healthcare in the context of provincial medico-legal legislation. - Personal care decisions include major health care decisions/treatments, establishing goals of care, future care planning, hospital discharge planning, acceptance of health services, and acceptance of residential care, among others including situations involving abuse or neglect. - This EPA includes an assessment of financial decision-making ability but does not involve any formal medico-legal opinion or declaration. - Observation of this EPA can be done in a variety of settings and experiences, including simulation, and inpatient service and outpatient clinic in Geriatric Medicine and/or Geriatric Psychiatry.

    Direct observation or case review by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Case presentation (select all that apply): personal care decision; financial decision; other - Observation: direct; case review - Simulation: yes; no - Supervisor: geriatrician; psychiatrist Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 1 personal care decision - At least 1 assessment of financial decision-making ability - At least 1 direct observation

    Suggested observations: 3

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Case presentation

    1. personal care decision
    2. financial decision
    3. other

    Observation

    1. direct
    2. case review

    Simulation

    1. yes
    2. no

    Supervisor

    1. geriatrician
    2. psychiatrist

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Perform a capacity assessment, screening for financial capacity, as required relevant to the patient presentation
    • ME 2.2 Demonstrate effective clinical problem solving and judgment to address patient capacity to make a decision
    • ME 2.4 Develop and implement management plans

    Communicator

    • COM 1.6 Tailor approaches to patient capacity assessment taking into account culture, education, sensory impairment, language
    • COM 3.1 Provide information on diagnosis and prognosis in a clear, comprehensive, respectful, and objective manner
    • COM 5.1 Maintain clear, concise, accurate, and appropriate records of clinical encounters and plans

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.3 Collaborate with the patient’s health care team in order to perform a comprehensive capacity assessment, as needed

    Health Advocate

    • HA 1.1 Facilitate timely access to resources including the public guardian and/or trustee, legal advice, appeal mechanisms, family education and support

    Professional

    • P 3.1 Apply provincial laws governing practice as it pertains to consent, capacity, and elder abuse and neglect

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-4

    Assessing and managing patients with complex and/or uncommon neurocognitive presentations

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on assessing and managing less common neurocognitive disorders, such as non-Alzheimer dementias and non-vascular dementias. - This EPA includes performing a comprehensive neurological exam to support atypical features, as well as managing other factors that can complicate the presentation. - This EPA does not include the diagnosis of common and typical neurocognitive disorders, the use of basic cognitive screening tests, or counselling about basic safety issues (e.g., driving, home safety, etc.) - The observation of this EPA is divided into two parts: assessment and management of complex and/or uncommon neurocognitive disorders; and counselling and communication of diagnosis and prognostic issues specific to these less common disorders. - This EPA may be observed in the simulation setting.

    Part A: Assessment and management Direct observation or case review by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Case mix: frontotemporal dementia (FTD); primary progressive aphasia (PPA); atypical Alzheimer’s dementia (AD); rapidly progressive dementia; Jakob-Creutzfeld dementia (JCD); Parkinson’s disease (PD) spectrum; infectious causes, including HIV; normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH); other - Setting: outpatient clinic; memory disorders clinic; geriatric unit; inpatient consult; day hospital; simulation; other - Supervisor: geriatrician; neurologist; psychiatrist; care of the elderly physician Collect 5 observations of achievement - At least 3 different presentations from case mix - At least 2 different assessors Part B: Counselling and communication Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Case mix: frontotemporal dementia (FTD); primary progressive aphasia (PPA); atypical Alzheimer’s dementia (AD); rapidly progressive dementia; Jakob-Creutzfeld dementia (JCD); Parkinson’s disease (PD) spectrum; infectious causes, including HIV; normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH); other - Supervisor: geriatrician; neurologist; psychiatrist Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 different presentations from case mix

    Suggested observations: 5

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Case mix

    1. frontotemporal dementia (FTD)
    2. primary progressive aphasia (PPA)
    3. atypical Alzheimer’s dementia (AD)
    4. rapidly progressive dementia
    5. Jakob-Creutzfeld dementia (JCD)
    6. Parkinson’s disease (PD) spectrum
    7. infectious causes, including HIV
    8. normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH)
    9. other

    Setting

    1. outpatient clinic
    2. memory disorders clinic
    3. geriatric unit
    4. inpatient consult
    5. day hospital
    6. simulation
    7. other

    Supervisor

    1. geriatrician
    2. neurologist
    3. psychiatrist
    4. care of the elderly physician

    Medical Expert

    • Part A: ME 1.6 Recognize and respond to the complexity, uncertainty, and ambiguity inherent in medical practice
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Perform a clinical assessment focusing on differentiating causes of complex and/or uncommon neurocognitive disorders
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Select and interpret neuroimaging and neuropsychology investigations, as appropriate
    • Part A: ME 2.4 Establish a patient-centred management plan for complex and/or uncommon neurocognitive disorders including both non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic modalities
    • Part A: ME 4.1 Establish and implement patient-centred care plans that involve available community resources

    Communicator

    • Part B: COM 1.6 Adapt to the unique needs/preferences of each patient
    • Part B: COM 3.1 Convey information and provide counselling related to the patient’s diagnosis, management plan, and prognosis in a timely, honest, and transparent manner

    Collaborator

    • Part A: COL 1.3 Use referral and consultation as opportunities to improve quality of care and patient safety by sharing expertise
    • Part B: COL 1.2 Make effective use of the scope and expertise of other health care professionals

    Leader

    • Part A: L 2.1 Demonstrate stewardship of health care resources

    Professional

    • Part B: P 1.3 Manage ethical issues encountered in the clinical setting including genetic testing, use of enteral feeding, resuscitation and end-of-life issues

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-5

    Assessing and managing behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD)

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the assessment and management of BPSD, including identifying possible contributing/precipitating factors across the spectrum of BPSD and establishing pharmacological and non-pharmacological management options. - This EPA includes integrating input from the interprofessional team and caregivers, engaging caregivers and the interprofessional team in the implementation of non- pharmacological interventions, and referring patients to subspecialty care, as appropriate.

    Direct observation or case review by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - BPSD presentations (select all that apply): sexually inappropriate behaviour; physical aggression; agitation; psychotic features; pacing/wandering; apathy; depression; anxiety; other - Setting: outpatient clinic; specialized (memory disorders) clinic; geriatric unit; inpatient consult; geriatric psychiatry; behavioural neurology; long-term care; day hospital; other - Supervisor role: geriatrician; neurologist; psychiatrist; care of the elderly physician Collect 5 observations of achievement - At least 3 different presentations - At least 3 different settings - At least 2 observations by a geriatrician

    Suggested observations: 5

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    BPSD presentations

    1. sexually inappropriate behaviour
    2. physical aggression
    3. agitation
    4. psychotic features
    5. pacing/wandering
    6. apathy
    7. depression
    8. anxiety
    9. other

    Setting

    1. outpatient clinic
    2. specialized (memory disorders) clinic
    3. geriatric unit
    4. inpatient consult
    5. geriatric psychiatry
    6. behavioural neurology
    7. long-term care
    8. day hospital
    9. other

    Supervisor role

    1. geriatrician
    2. neurologist
    3. psychiatrist
    4. care of the elderly physician

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.1 Iteratively establish priorities, considering the perspective of the patient and family as the patient’s situation evolves
    • ME 2.2 Perform medication reviews
    • ME 2.2 Identify potential medication-related contributors to BPSD
    • ME 2.2 Synthesize patient information to determine underlying causes/precipitating factors of BPSD
    • ME 2.4 Develop and implement non-pharmacologic interventions in collaboration with the patient and family, and the interprofessional team
    • ME 2.4 Integrate optimal prescription practices into management plan
    • ME 4.1 Determine the necessity and timing of referral to another health care professional
    • ME 4.1 Establish plans for ongoing care, taking into consideration the patient’s clinical state, circumstances, preferences, and actions, as well as available resources, best practices, and research evidence

    Communicator

    • COM 1.4 Respond to patient’s non-verbal communication and use appropriate non-verbal behaviours to enhance communication
    • COM 2.2 Manage the flow of challenging patient or caregiver encounters, including those with angry or distressed individuals
    • COM 3.1 Share information and explanations that are clear and accurate while checking for patient and family understanding

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.3 Engage in respectful shared decision-making with primary and/or referring physicians and other health care professionals

    Health Advocate

    • HA 1.1 Facilitate timely patient access to health services and resources

    Scholar

    • S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise into decision-making

    Professional

    • P 2.2 Demonstrate a commitment to patient safety and quality improvement through adherence to institutional policies and best practices around physical and chemical restraints

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-6

    Preventing and managing delirium

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on identifying patients at risk for delirium, implementing prevention strategies at individual patient and institutional levels, and managing delirium. - This EPA applies to simple and complicated delirium. Complicated delirium includes factors that make the management of delirium more challenging and require a higher level of expertise. Examples include: prolonged duration despite optimization of medical issues; lack of clear etiology of delirium; multiple competing etiologies of delirium; conflict within health care team regarding optimal management; need to collaborate with multiple other specialties involved in the case. - This EPA also includes identifying long-term outcomes, and advocacy and education for improved prevention, recognition, and management of delirium by other health care professionals. - The observation of this EPA is divided into two parts: preventing delirium; and managing delirium.

    Part A: Preventing delirium Case discussion with geriatrician Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Setting: inpatient consult; geriatric unit; outpatient clinic; geriatric oncology; Transcatheter Heart Valve Program (TAVI) clinic; residential care; emergency department; other Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 different settings - At least 2 different assessors Part B: Managing delirium Case discussion with geriatrician Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Complicated delirium factors (select all that apply): not applicable; chemical restraint; physical restraint; environmental restraint; prolonged duration despite optimization of medical issues; lack of clear etiology; multiple competing etiologies; addressing knowledge gaps within health care team on optimal management; need to collaborate with multiple other specialties involved in the case; other Complete 3 observations of achievement - At least 2 with one or more complicated delirium factors - At least 2 different assessors

    Suggested observations: 2

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Setting

    1. inpatient consult
    2. geriatric unit
    3. outpatient clinic
    4. geriatric oncology
    5. Transcatheter Heart Valve Program (TAVI) clinic
    6. residential care
    7. emergency department
    8. other

    Medical Expert

    • Part A: ME 1.3 Apply a broad base and depth of knowledge in clinical and biomedical sciences to the identification, prevention and/or management of delirium
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Identify patients with atypical presentations and/or course of delirium
    • Part A: ME 2.4 Develop and implement multi-component prevention strategies for delirium
    • Part A: ME 3.1 Determine the most appropriate procedures or therapies for the purpose of assessment and/or management of delirium
    • Part A: ME 2.4 Integrate non-pharmacologic therapies into delirium prevention
    • Part A: ME 5.1 Optimize the safety of patients in delirium, ensuring the avoidance of chemical and physical restraints whenever possible and using them skilfully and appropriately when necessary
    • Part A: ME 4.1 Implement a patient-centred care plan that supports ongoing care, follow-up on investigations, response to treatment, and further consultation
    • Part B: ME 1.3 Apply a broad base and depth of knowledge in clinical and biomedical sciences to the identification, prevention and/or management of delirium
    • Part B: ME 2.2 Identify patients with atypical presentations and/or course of delirium
    • Part B: ME 2.4 Develop and implement management plans
    • Part B: ME 3.1 Determine the most appropriate procedures or therapies for the purpose of assessment and/or management of delirium
    • Part B: ME 2.4 Integrate non-pharmacologic therapies into management plans for delirium
    • Part B: ME 5.1 Optimize the safety of patients in delirium, ensuring the avoidance of chemical and physical restraints whenever possible and using them skilfully and appropriately when necessary
    • Part B: ME 4.1 Implement a patient-centred care plan that supports ongoing care, follow-up on investigations, response to treatment, and further consultation

    Communicator

    • Part A: COM 3.1 Convey information related to the patient’s health status, care, and needs in a timely, honest, and transparent manner
    • Part B: COM 3.1 Convey information related to the patient’s health status, care, and needs in a timely, honest, and transparent manner

    Leader

    • Part A: L 1.4 Engage others in the adoption and refinement of health information technology or systems for improved delirium prevention
    • Part B: L 1.4 Engage others in the adoption and refinement of health information technology or systems for improved management of delirium

    Health Advocate

    • Part A: HA 1.3 Work with the patient and family to identify opportunities for delirium prevention
    • Part A: HA 2.3 Contribute to a process to improve prevention, recognition, and management of delirium within a community or population

    Scholar

    • Part A: S 4.1 Contribute to a scholarly investigation or the dissemination of research findings on the prevention and management of delirium

    Professional

    • Part A: P 3.1 Adhere to professional and ethical codes, standards of practice, and laws governing practice
    • Part B: P 3.1 Adhere to professional and ethical codes, standards of practice, and laws governing practice

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-7

    Assessing and managing older adults with uncomplicated mental health conditions

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on common uncomplicated mental health conditions in the presence or absence of medical co-morbidities. - This EPA includes assessing suicidal and homicidal risk, diagnosing common uncomplicated mental health conditions, recognizing potential medical conditions contributing to the disorder, and recognizing complex psychiatric conditions, knowing when to refer or participate in co-management with mental health care providers. - This EPA does not include assessing and managing complex mental health conditions, such as psychotic depression, active suicidal or homicidal ideations, or exacerbation of chronic psychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder or personality disorder. - The observation of this EPA is divided into two parts: patient interview; and management.

    Part A: Patient interview Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Mental health condition: depression; anxiety; sleep disorder; delusional disorder; other - Setting: geriatric psychiatry; outpatient clinic; geriatric unit; inpatient consult; day hospital; other - Supervisor role: geriatrician; psychiatrist; care of the elderly physician Collect at least 1 observation of achievement Part B: Management Case discussion with supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Mental health condition: depression; anxiety; sleep disorder; delusional disorder; other - Co-morbidities: no; yes [if yes, open text box to record] - Setting: geriatric psychiatry; outpatient clinic; geriatric unit; inpatient consult; day hospital; other - Supervisor role: geriatrician; psychiatrist; care of the elderly physician Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 1 depression and 1 anxiety condition - At least 1 observation by a geriatrician - At least 2 different assessors

    Suggested observations: 3

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Mental health condition

    1. depression
    2. anxiety
    3. sleep disorder
    4. delusional disorder
    5. other

    Setting

    1. geriatric psychiatry
    2. outpatient clinic
    3. geriatric unit
    4. inpatient consult
    5. day hospital
    6. other

    Supervisor role

    1. geriatrician
    2. psychiatrist
    3. care of the elderly physician

    Medical Expert

    • Part A: ME 1.4 Perform clinical assessments that identify suicidal and homicidal risk
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Elicit a history, and interpret the results for the purpose of diagnosis and management of uncomplicated mental health conditions
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Synthesize patient information to recognize potential organic conditions contributing to the disorder
    • Part A: ME 3.1 Describe indications, contraindications, risks, and alternatives of pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapy
    • Part A: ME 4.1 Determine the need, timing and priority of referral to another physician and/or health care professional
    • Part B: ME 1.3 Apply clinical and biomedical sciences to the assessment and management of common uncomplicated mental health conditions in older adults
    • Part B: ME 2.4 Provide evidence-informed, patient-centred care of uncomplicated mental health conditions in the presence of medical co-morbidities
    • Part B: ME 4.1 Determine the need, timing and priority of referral to another physician and/or health care professional

    Communicator

    • Part B: COM 3.1 Share information and explanations that are clear and accurate while checking for patient and family understanding

    Collaborator

    • Part B: COL 1.3 Use co-management and consultation as opportunities to improve quality of care and patient safety by sharing expertise
    • Part B: COL 1.3 Engage in respectful shared decision-making with other physicians and/or health care professionals

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-8

    Managing end-of-life care in older adults

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on providing end-of-life care for patients with a major neurocognitive disorder or non-cancer diagnosis. - This EPA includes establishing goals of care, projecting trajectory of illness and care needs, managing patient, family and care provider expectations, and communicating prognosis. - This EPA also includes medical management such as the use of non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches to symptom control, optimal prescribing and deprescribing, awareness of the referral process for local community resources including palliative services and medical assistance in dying (MAiD), and advance care planning (e.g., substitute decision makers). - This EPA may be observed in any clinical setting, including residential care and palliative care rotations. - The observation of this EPA is divided into two parts: medical management; and communication.

    Part A: Medical management Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Patient diagnosis: non-cancer diagnosis; major neurocognitive disorder; other - Supervisor: geriatrician; palliative care physician; care of the elderly physician; internist Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 1 patient with a non-cancer diagnosis or major neurocognitive disorder Part B: Communication Direct observation by supervisor, incorporating feedback from other members of health care team Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Supervisor: geriatrician; palliative care physician; care of the elderly physician; internist Collect 2 observations of achievement

    Suggested observations: 2

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Patient diagnosis

    1. non-cancer diagnosis
    2. major neurocognitive disorder
    3. other

    Supervisor

    1. geriatrician
    2. palliative care physician
    3. care of the elderly physician
    4. internist

    Medical Expert

    • Part A: ME 1.6 Adapt care as the complexity, uncertainty, and ambiguity of the patient’s clinical situation evolves
    • Part A: ME 2.1 Identify patients whose condition has progressed to end stage
    • Part A: ME 2.1 Identify patients for whom the patient-perceived burden of disease- modifying therapy or investigations is greater than the clinical benefit
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Project the trajectory of illness and care needs
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Perform medication reviews
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Demonstrate optimal prescribing and deprescribing practices
    • Part A: ME 2.3 Recognize and respond to signs that it is time to transition care away from a disease-modifying approach
    • Part A: ME 2.3 Establish goals of care in collaboration with the patient and family
    • Part A: ME 2.3 Address the impact of the medical condition on the patient’s ability to pursue life goals and purposes
    • Part A: ME 2.4 Establish a patient-centred management plan focused on implementing patient choices
    • Part A: ME 2.4 Develop and implement management plans that optimize symptom management and support achievement of the patient’s goals of care
    • Part A: ME 3.1 Determine the most appropriate pharmacological and non- pharmacological approaches to symptom control
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Select investigations and therapies appropriate to the patient’s goals of care

    Communicator

    • Part B: COM 2.1 Gather information about the patient’s beliefs, values, preferences, context, and expectations with regards to their care
    • Part B: COM 3.1 Provide information on diagnosis and prognosis in a clear, compassionate, respectful, and objective manner
    • Part B: COM 4.3 Use communication skills and strategies that help the patient and family make informed decisions

    Professional

    • Part A: P 3.1 Fulfil and adhere to the professional and ethical codes, standards of practice, and laws governing practice
    • Part A: P 3.1 Demonstrate knowledge and appropriate use of provincial laws governing practice as it pertains to medical assistance in dying (MAiD)
    • Part A: P 3.1 Demonstrate knowledge and appropriate use of provincial laws governing practice as it pertains to planning for future end-of-life care such as substitute decision makers, advanced directives, and preferred setting for end-of-life care, as applicable
    • Part B: P 3.1 Fulfil and adhere to the professional and ethical codes, standards of practice, and laws governing practice
    • Part B: P 3.1 Demonstrate knowledge and appropriate use of provincial laws governing practice as it pertains to medical assistance in dying (MAiD)
    • Part B: P 3.1 Demonstrate knowledge and appropriate use of provincial laws governing practice as it pertains to planning for future end-of-life care such as substitute decision makers, advanced directives, and preferred setting for end-of-life care, as applicable

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-9

    Assessing and managing complex psychosocial issues unique to vulnerable older adults

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on identifying, assessing, and managing complex psychosocial issues, including vulnerability, caregiver burden, conflictual family dynamics, elder abuse and neglect, safety issues and risks, legal and ethical issues in care planning, and high-risk transitions of care. - This EPA includes optimizing safety consistent with patient preferences, taking legal action when required and appropriate, demonstrating cultural competence, referring patients to appropriate resources, and counselling patients and/or caregivers. - This EPA may be observed in any clinical setting, including family meetings, through direct observation of components of the CGA and discussions with other health professionals, family, and substitute decision makers. - The observation of this EPA is divided into two parts: case discussion; and submission of case narratives. - The submission of case narratives requires the resident to submit a portfolio with three narrative reflections (on different topics) for discussion with the faculty advisor/supervisor.

    Part A: Case discussion Case discussion with supervising geriatrician Use Form 1 Collect 2 observation of achievement Part B: Portfolio and supervisor discussion Supervisor review of 3 narrative cases submitted by resident on different topics Use Form 4 Collect 1 observation of achievement

    Suggested observations: 2

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • Part A: ME 1.6 Recognize and respond to the complexity, uncertainty, and ambiguity inherent in medical practice
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Identify patients with complex psychosocial issues
    • Part A: ME 1.4 Recognize urgent situations that may need the involvement of more experienced colleagues, team members and community resources
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Recognize patients at risk of elder abuse/neglect or safety issues, or legal and ethical issues in care planning, and report if appropriate
    • Part A: ME 2.4 Establish patient-centred management plans that demonstrate cultural competence, incorporating all of the patient’s health problems and needs, values and preferences

    Communicator

    • Part A: COM 5.1 Document clinical encounters to adequately convey identified risks of elder abuse/neglect, safety issues and/or legal and ethical issues
    • Part A: COM 1.3 Reflect on how personal bias and cultural competence impacts care delivery
    • Part A: COM 1.3 Recognize when strong emotions such as anger, fear, anxiety, or sadness are impacting on interactions and respond appropriately with suggestions for future encounters

    Health Advocate

    • Part A: HA 1.1 Identify the risk factors, consequences and potential interventions for social isolation and elder abuse/neglect
    • Part A: HA 1.1 Reflect on the determinants of health that affect access to health care and resources for older adult patients

    Professional

    • Part A: P 3.1 Apply provincial laws governing practice as it pertains to consent, capacity, and elder abuse and neglect

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-10

    Running family and team meetings

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on organizing and leading a meeting, including giving effective and constructive feedback to the interprofessional team and/or individual team members. - This includes leading the discussion, attending to meeting flow and organization, encouraging participation of the team, and integrating information from the interprofessional team to complete the assessment and management of the patient, patient-centred goal-setting, and discharge planning. - This EPA also includes managing conflicts, managing and communicating diagnosis, management plan, discharge planning and discussing adverse events with patient and family. - Observation of this EPA must include use of a Team Meeting and Family Meeting STACER ∗. Simulation of conflict situations may also be utilized.

    Multiple observers may contribute provide feedback individually to the supervisor, which is then collated to one report Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Type of meeting: family; team - Observer (select all that apply): geriatrician; care of the elderly physician; other supervising physician; other health professional - Family Meeting STACER: yes; no - Team Meeting STACER: yes; no - Simulation: yes; no Collect 4 observations of achievement - At least 2 of each meeting type - At least 1 observation by a supervising geriatrician - At least 1 STACER for each meeting type ∗ STACER is not available on ePortfolio platform

    Suggested observations: 4

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Type of meeting

    1. family
    2. team

    Observer

    1. geriatrician
    2. care of the elderly physician
    3. other supervising physician
    4. other health professional

    Family Meeting STACER

    1. yes
    2. no

    Team Meeting STACER

    1. yes
    2. no

    Simulation

    1. yes
    2. no

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.1 Demonstrate responsibility and accountability for decisions regarding patient care, acting in the role of most responsible physician
    • ME 2.4 Establish management plans in patient encounters when there are significant disagreements about what is achievable

    Communicator

    • COM 1.3 Recognize when the values, biases, or perspectives of patients, physicians, or other health care professionals may have an impact on the quality of care and modify the approach to the patient accordingly
    • COM 1.4 Manage own non-verbal communication skills in difficult situations
    • COM 1.5 Manage disagreements and emotionally charged conversations
    • COM 3.1 Communicate clearly with patients and others in the setting of ethical dilemmas
    • COM 3.2 Disclose patient safety incidents to the patient and family accurately and appropriately
    • COM 4.1 Facilitate discussions with the patient and family in a way that is respectful, non-judgmental, and culturally safe

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.1 Establish and maintain healthy relationships with physicians and other colleagues in the health care professions to support relationship- centred collaborative care
    • COL 1.2 Negotiate overlapping and shared care responsibilities with physicians and other colleagues in the health care professions in episodic and ongoing care
    • COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with physicians and other health care professionals
    • COL 1.3 Engage in respectful shared decision-making with other physicians and/or health care professionals
    • COL 2.1 Delegate tasks and responsibilities in an appropriate and respectful manner
    • COL 2.1 Show respect toward collaborators
    • COL 2.2 Implement strategies to promote understanding, manage differences, and resolve conflicts in a manner that supports a collaborative culture

    Leader

    • L 3.1 Demonstrate leadership skills to enhance health care
    • L 4.1 Set priorities and manage time

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Intervene when behaviours toward colleagues and/or learners undermine a respectful environment
    • P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviours and relationships in all aspects of practice
    • P 1.1 Lead initiatives that promote respectful work environments

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-11

    Teaching other learners

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on teaching, giving constructive feedback to learners, and choosing appropriate learning methods. - This EPA includes formal and informal teaching sessions delivered to peers, broad audiences, other learners, faculty, other health professionals, and/or the public. - This EPA does not include individual patient counselling. - This EPA has two parts: giving feedback to junior learners; and formal scheduled teaching.

    Part A: Feedback to junior learners Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Settings: clinical setting with junior learners (please specify) - Supervisor role: geriatrician; care of the elderly physician; psychiatrist; physiatrist; other Collect 2 observations of achievement Part B: Formal scheduled teaching Direct observation by supervisor, incorporating feedback from learners Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Presentation type: academic half day session; grand rounds; journal club; formal undergraduate medical courses; small group formal session; large group formal session; other - Learner/audience (select all that apply): peers; faculty; other learners; other health professionals; public; community organization; other Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 different settings/presentation types

    Suggested observations: 2

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Supervisor role

    1. geriatrician
    2. care of the elderly physician
    3. psychiatrist
    4. physiatrist
    5. other

    Scholar

    • Part A: S 2.1 Be a positive role model
    • Part A: S 2.2 Create a positive learning environment
    • Part A: S 2.3 Be available and accessible to junior learners
    • Part A: S 2.4 Identify the learning needs and desired learning outcomes of others
    • Part A: S 2.4 Present information in an organized manner to facilitate understanding
    • Part A: S 2.5 Identify behaviours to continue as well as those for improvement
    • Part A: S 2.5 Provide specific suggestions for improvement of performance
    • Part A: S 2.5 Provide examples of learner performance to support the overall assessment
    • Part A: S 2.5 Provide narrative comments that support the overall assessment
    • Part B: S 2.1 Be a positive role model
    • Part B: S 2.2 Create a positive learning environment
    • Part B: S 2.4 Identify the learning needs and desired learning outcomes of others
    • Part B: S 2.4 Develop learning objectives for a teaching activity adapting to the audience and setting
    • Part B: S 2.4 Present information in an organized manner to facilitate understanding
    • Part B: S 2.4 Use audiovisual aids effectively, as appropriate
    • Part B: S 2.4 Provide adequate time for questions and discussion

    Professional

    • Part A: P 1.1 Intervene when behaviours toward colleagues and/or learners undermine a respectful environment
    • Part A: P 1.1 Complete learner assessments in a timely fashion
    • Part B: P 1.1 Intervene when behaviours toward colleagues and/or learners undermine a respectful environment

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

Transition to Practice

  • TTP-1

    Managing the Geriatrician’s practice

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA includes managing service delivery, contributing to team functioning, managing patient flow, demonstrating the ability to work simultaneously in more than one setting (covering more than one clinical service at a time, teaching, committees), completing medical and legal documents, time management, office management, billing, and remuneration. - This EPA may be observed across a combination of inpatient/consult service, and outpatient experiences.

    Direct or indirect observation by geriatrician based on a block of time (minimum 2 weeks) Use Form 1 Collect 1 observation of achievement

    Suggested observations: 1

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.5 Prioritize patients based on the urgency of clinical presentation
    • ME 1.5 Carry out professional duties in the face of multiple, competing demands

    Collaborator

    • COL 3.2 Demonstrate safe handover of care during patient transition out of the hospital setting

    Leader

    • L 2.1 Allocate health care resources for optimal patient care
    • L 4.1 Set priorities and manage time to fulfil diverse responsibilities including clinical, administrative, supervisory, and teaching responsibilities
    • L 4.2 Describe remuneration models as they pertain to Geriatric Medicine

    Scholar

    • S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise into decision-making

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Respond appropriately to feedback from patients, families and health care professionals
    • P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviours
    • P 2.1 Demonstrate accountability to patients, society and profession by participating in ethical billing practices
    • P 4.1 Manage the mental and physical challenges that impact physician wellness and/or performance in demanding or stressful clinical settings

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTP-2

    Contributing to the improvement of health care delivery for older people in teams, organizations, and systems

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA includes demonstrating leadership through any of the following: o participating in committees (divisional, organizational) o advocating for Geriatrics external to own institution or setting o understanding requirements needed for health care program design, implementation and evaluation o applying evidence and management processes to achieve cost appropriate care o participating in policy or advocacy development o demonstrating capacity building and knowledge translation o demonstrating skills in hospital and system navigation by understanding local, regional, national policies and environments o collaborating and working effectively in quality improvement and other systems- based initiatives to assure patient safety and improve outcomes for older adults - This EPA may be observed in any clinical setting. - The observation of this EPA is based on supervisor observation of participation in a leadership activity.

    Direct or indirect observation by geriatrician, program director, project supervisor, or faculty advisor, incorporating feedback from interprofessional team members or committee members Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Activity: case report; health promotion project; QI project; committee participation; policy review; advocacy activity; morbidity and mortality rounds; community teaching; other Collect 2 observations of achievement

    Suggested observations: 2

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Activity

    1. case report
    2. health promotion project
    3. QI project
    4. committee participation
    5. policy review
    6. advocacy activity
    7. morbidity and mortality rounds
    8. community teaching
    9. other

    Leader

    • L 1.1 Gather information for the purposes of quality assurance or improvement
    • L 1.1 Integrate existing standards for health care delivery with findings of data collection
    • L 1.1 Identify potential improvement opportunities
    • L 1.1 Identify the impact of human and system factors on health care delivery
    • L 3.1 Contribute to a health care change initiative
    • L 3.1 Demonstrate leadership skills to enhance health care

    Health Advocate

    • HA 2.2 Improve clinical practice by applying a process of continuous quality improvement
    • HA 2.3 Contribute to a process to improve health in the community or older adult population

    Scholar

    • S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise into decision-making
    • S 4.4 Perform data analysis

    Professional

    • P 2.2 Demonstrate a commitment to patient safety and quality improvement initiatives within their own practice environment

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTP-3

    Planning and completing personalized training experiences aligned with career plans and/or specific learnin…

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA is applicable to elective training experiences that a resident may choose to complete during their geriatric medicine residency. - This EPA allows the resident to individualize training to meet the needs of their intended community and/or personal career goals. - This EPA may be applied to more than one distinct training experience (e.g., including but not limited to medical, surgical, imaging, and public health training experiences). - This EPA may be used for any structured training experience: clinical or academic. - The assessment of this EPA is based on the achievement of outcomes identified by the resident and approved by the program director/program committee. These outcomes must be SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, timely).

    Competence Committee, program director, and supervisor review of resident’s plan and outcome Use Form 4 Collect 1 observation of achievement

    Suggested observations: 1

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Leader

    • L 4.2 Adjust educational experiences to gain competencies necessary for future practice

    Health Advocate

    • HA 2.3 Identify and respond to unmet health care needs within one’s practice

    Scholar

    • S 1.1 Create and implement a learning plan
    • S 1.1 Develop and document a structured approach to monitor progress of learning, including identifying timelines and accountabilities
    • S 1.1 Develop clear outcomes to assess progress of learning
    • S 1.2 Identify a specific area for improvement related to the needs of their intended community and/or career goals

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2022 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.