Skip to content

EPA library

Forensic Pathology

Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada · 1.1 · 29 EPAs

Also available in French.

Every EPA in the published guide, shown as the form DebriefMD fills in, with its fields and answer options.

Transition to Discipline

  • TTD-1

    Performing pre-autopsy assessments

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Synthesize case information to develop a differential diagnosis
    • ME 2.2 Select procedures based on a differential diagnosis
    • ME 2.3 Confirm identification of the deceased
    • ME 3.2 Ensure legal authorization for autopsy has been obtained

    Communicator

    • COM 1.5 Apply knowledge of cultural and religious accommodations in scheduling and techniques for post-mortem exams and death investigations ensuring that the death investigation is not compromised
    • COM 2.1 Integrate and summarize information obtained from the case file
    • COM 2.1 Seek and synthesize information from other sources

    Scholar

    • S 3.1 Recognize uncertainty and knowledge gaps in professional encounters relevant to Forensic Pathology

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Complete assigned responsibilities

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTD-2

    Performing autopsies

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.3 Apply a broad base and depth of knowledge in clinical and biomedical sciences in autopsy pathology
    • ME 1.3 Demonstrate awareness of relevant laws and regulations in relation to tissue/organ procurement, tissue retention, principles of consent, privacy and confidentiality
    • ME 2.5 Perform external examination of the body
    • ME 2.5 Perform evisceration of organs and gross dissection
    • ME 2.5 Recognize and describe evidence of disease and/or injury
    • ME 3.4 Obtain appropriate samples

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.2 Work effectively with autopsy room staff, directing their assistance during autopsy procedures
    • COL 2.1 Convey information respectfully

    Leader

    • L 1.2 Apply the principles of laboratory safety and universal precautions

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Complete assigned responsibilities

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTD-3

    Preparing autopsy reports in uncomplicated cases

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.3 Apply a broad base and depth of knowledge in clinical and biomedical sciences in autopsy pathology
    • ME 1.6 Recognize limits of own expertise and seek assistance
    • ME 2.2 Interpret results of investigations based on differential diagnoses
    • ME 2.5 Prepare written descriptions of the external, internal and microscopic findings
    • ME 2.5 Interpret post-mortem findings in light of the clinical history and/or scene investigation and appreciate potential limitations of such interpretations

    Communicator

    • COM 4.1 Organize information in appropriate sections within a written, electronic or other digital record
    • COM 4.1 Document autopsy procedure, sampling, and findings using a standard format and including all relevant information
    • COM 4.1 Document medical reasoning and rationale for opinion
    • COM 4.1 Document autopsy findings in an accurate, complete and timely manner and in compliance with legal and privacy requirements

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Complete assigned responsibilities
    • P 4.2 Recognize evolving professional identity transitions and manage inherent stresses

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

Foundations

  • F-1

    Interpreting the circumstances of the case

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Interpret and evaluate information collected at the death scene including but not limited to health history, social information, and circumstances of death
    • ME 2.2 Synthesize case information to develop a differential diagnosis
    • ME 2.2 Select procedures based on a differential diagnosis
    • ME 2.2 Describe the conditions under which a death is considered suspicious
    • ME 2.5 Review the death scene information and clinical history in routine cases
    • ME 3.2 Determine whether jurisdictional authorization applies

    Communicator

    • COM 2.1 Seek and synthesize relevant information from other sources, including the stakeholders, law enforcement personnel, and the medico- legal team
    • COM 2.1 Integrate and summarize information obtained from the case file

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.1 Receive and appropriately respond to input from other medico-legal professionals

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Independently manage specialty-specific issues surrounding confidentiality, intervening when confidentiality is breached

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-2

    Performing dissections including: open the calvarium; layered anterior neck with tongue removal; layered ante…

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of anatomy and physiology
    • ME 2.5 Recognize and describe evidence of natural disease and/or injury
    • ME 3.1 Integrate all sources of information to develop a procedural plan that is safe, and considers the risks and benefits of all approaches
    • ME 3.1 Recognize indications for performing procedures
    • ME 3.4 Perform common procedures in a skillful, fluid, and safe manner with minimal assistance
    • ME 3.4 Seek assistance as needed when unanticipated findings or changing circumstances are encountered

    Leader

    • L 1.2 Apply the principles of laboratory safety and universal precautions consistently

    Scholar

    • S 3.1 Recognize uncertainty and knowledge gaps in clinical and other professional encounters relevant to Forensic Pathology

    Professional

    • P 3.1 Fulfil and adhere to the professional and ethical codes, standards of practice, and laws governing practice
    • P 4.1 Manage the impact of physical and environmental factors on performance

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-3

    Performing forensic autopsies of routine cases (adult and older child, non- suspicious injuries, suicide, sud…

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • Part A: ME 1.3 Apply clinical and biomedical sciences to Forensic Pathology
    • Part A: ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of anatomy and physiology
    • Part A: ME 2.5 Perform examination of tissue microscopically and review of toxicology or other ancillary test results where appropriate in routine cases
    • Part A: ME 2.5 Identify the circumstances when toxicological and other ancillary investigations/tests may be appropriate for routine cases, and apply the procedures for sampling tissues, fluids and other evidence for these additional investigations
    • Part A: ME 2.6 Take or organize satisfactory external, gross and microscopic photographs of the post- mortem examination and any relevant tissues
    • Part A: ME 3.4 Seek assistance as needed when unanticipated findings or changing circumstances are encountered
    • Part B: ME 2.5 Prepare written descriptions of the findings in routine cases
    • Part B: ME 2.5 Formulate conclusions regarding mechanism, cause and manner of death in routine cases

    Communicator

    • Part A: COM 2.1 Seek and synthesize relevant information from sources, including the stakeholders, law enforcement personnel and medico-legal team
    • Part B: COM 4.1 Summarize and convey autopsy findings in a written and oral fashion appropriate to the audience

    Collaborator

    • Part A: COL 1.1 Receive and appropriately respond to input from other medico-legal professionals
    • Part A: COL 2.2 Communicate clearly and directly to promote understanding, manage differences, and resolve conflicts

    Leader

    • Part A: L 2.1 Consider costs when choosing case management options
    • Part A: L 2.2 Apply evidence and guidelines with respect to resource utilization in common scenarios

    Professional

    • Part A: P 3.1 Fulfil and adhere to the professional and ethical codes, standards of practice, and laws governing practice

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-4

    Preparing forensic pathology reports, including opinions, of routine cases

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.3 Apply clinical and biomedical sciences to Forensic Pathology
    • ME 1.6 Recognize the limitations of time of death determination in a post-mortem exam
    • ME 2.5 Review the death scene information and clinical history in routine cases
    • ME 2.4 Perform examination of tissues microscopically and review of toxicology or other ancillary test results where appropriate in routine cases
    • ME 2.5 Prepare written descriptions of the findings in routine cases
    • ME 2.5 Interpret post-mortem findings in light of the clinical history and/or scene investigation and appreciate potential limitations of such interpretations
    • ME 3.4 Seek assistance as needed when unanticipated findings or changing circumstances are encountered
    • ME 4.1 Ensure follow-up on results of investigation and ancillary testing

    Communicator

    • COM 4.1 Document information about decedent and their medical conditions in a manner that enhances death investigation
    • COM 4.1 Document death investigation to adequately support conclusions and with adequate detail to allow independent review
    • COM 4.1 Summarize and convey autopsy findings in an written and oral fashion appropriate to the audience

    Health Advocate

    • HA 1.1 Work with the family to identify opportunities for disease prevention, health promotion, and health protection
    • HA 1.1 Identify hereditary diseases and inform family members to protect the health of living relatives

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-5

    Delivering preliminary autopsy information to a variety of audiences

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.3 Demonstrate awareness of relevant laws and regulations in relation to tissue/organ procurement, tissue retention, principles of consent, privacy and confidentiality
    • ME 1.6 Recognize the limitations of time of death determination in a post-mortem exam
    • ME 2.5 Interpret post-mortem findings in light of the clinical history and/or scene investigation and appreciate potential limitations of such interpretations

    Communicator

    • COM 1.1 Communicate using an approach that facilitates trust and autonomy and is characterized by empathy, respect, and compassion
    • COM 1.4 Recognize when strong emotions (such as anger, fear, anxiety, or sadness) are impacting an interaction and respond appropriately
    • COM 2.1 Integrate, summarize, and present the information obtained from a death investigation
    • COM 3.1 Discuss with the stakeholders and family the degree of uncertainty inherent in all ongoing pending investigations

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.1 Receive and appropriately respond to input from other medico-legal professionals

    Scholar

    • S 3.1 Recognize uncertainty and knowledge gaps in professional encounters relevant to Forensic Pathology

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Independently manage specialty-specific issues surrounding confidentiality, intervening when confidentiality is breached
    • P 1.2 Demonstrate an appreciation of the limitations of findings, individual professional limits and the necessity of seeking appropriate second opinions

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • F-6

    Managing cases within the standards of timelines and resource stewardship

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.1 Iteratively establish priorities
    • ME 4.1 Ensure follow-up on results of investigation and ancillary testing

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.1 Receive and appropriately respond to input from other medico-legal professionals
    • COL 2.1 Delegate tasks and responsibilities in an appropriate and respectful manner

    Leader

    • L 1.2 Apply the principles of laboratory safety and universal precautions consistently
    • L 2.2 Apply evidence and guidelines with respect to resource utilization in common scenarios
    • L 3.1 Engage personnel and procedures effectively in death investigations including maintaining the legal chain of custody of evidence

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Complete assigned responsibilities
    • P 3.1 Fulfil and adhere to the professional and ethical codes, standards of practice, and laws governing practice
    • P 4.1 Demonstrate an ability to regulate attention, emotions, thoughts, and behaviours while maintaining capacity to perform professional tasks

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

Core

  • C-1

    Providing case management of the scene

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.6 Describe the information and limitations pathology can provide in a given situation including but not limited to time of death determination
    • ME 2.2 Focus the death investigation, performing it in a time-effective manner, without excluding key elements
    • ME 2.2 Recognize the conditions under which a death is considered suspicious and manage appropriately
    • ME 2.2 Collect and preserve evidence from a death scene, including photographs
    • ME 2.2 Examine the body
    • ME 2.2 Assess a death scene based on information provided by investigators
    • ME 5.1 Prevent contamination of the death scene

    Communicator

    • COM 4.1 Adapt record keeping to the specific guidelines of Forensic Pathology and the medico-legal context
    • COM 4.3 Share information with stakeholders and others in a manner that respects privacy and confidentiality and enhances understanding

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with physicians and other colleagues in the medico-legal team

    Leader

    • L 1.2 Actively encourage all involved in death investigation, regardless of their role, to report and respond to unsafe situations
    • L 3.1 Engage personnel and procedures effectively in death investigations including maintaining the legal chain of custody of evidence

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-2

    Confirming the identity of the deceased

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA focuses on the variety of methods available to confirm the identity of the deceased. - The case used to observe this EPA must require methodologies other than visual identification.

    Case discussion by supervisor Use Form 1. Form must collect information on: - Identification: visual; other Collect 1 observation of achievement - At least 1 case that needed methodologies other than visual

    Suggested observations: 1

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of the principles of the various fields of forensic sciences, including toxicology, chemistry, biology (including DNA testing), firearm and tool mark examination, entomology, forensic photography, blood pattern analysis, fingerprint analysis, trace evidence and alternative light source examinations
    • ME 2.3 Assess the adequacy of current identification of the deceased
    • ME 4.1 Determine the necessity and appropriate timing of consultation
    • ME 2.3 Establish identification, with consultation where appropriate

    Communicator

    • COM 2.1 Seek and synthesize relevant information from sources, including the stakeholders, law enforcement personnel and medico-legal team

    Professional

    • P 1.2 Demonstrate an appreciation of the limitations of findings, individual professional limitations and the necessity of seeking appropriate second opinions
    • P 3.1 Fulfil and adhere to the professional and ethical codes, standards of practice, and laws governing practice

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-3

    Performing special dissections including: face; eye; middle ear; posterior neck; vertebral artery; layered po…

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.6 Seek assistance in situations that are complex or new
    • ME 3.1 Integrate planned procedures into global assessment and management plans
    • ME 3.1 Recognize indications for performing special dissections
    • ME 3.3 Triage a procedure, taking into account available resources
    • ME 3.4 Competently perform discipline-specific dissections
    • ME 3.4 Recognize and interpret findings
    • ME 3.4 Document procedures accurately

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Inform funeral home personnel when special dissections or artefacts of post- mortem examination may require special handling

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-4

    Performing forensic autopsies in pediatric cases

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • Part A: ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of the principles of the various fields of forensic sciences, including toxicology, chemistry, biology (including DNA testing), firearm and tool mark examination, entomology, forensic photography, blood pattern analysis, fingerprint analysis, trace evidence and alternative light source examinations
    • Part A: ME 2.5 Review the death scene information and clinical history in complex and/or pediatric cases
    • Part A: ME 2.5 Perform examination of tissues microscopically and review toxicology or other ancillary test results where appropriate in complex and/or pediatric cases
    • Part A: ME 2.6 Take or organize satisfactory external, gross and microscopic photographs of the post- mortem examination and any relevant tissues
    • Part A: ME 3.4 Perform procedures in a skillful and safe manner, adapting to unanticipated findings or changing circumstances
    • Part A: ME 4.1 Recognize the need for consultations, including but not limited to neuropathology, cardiovascular pathology, forensic anthropology and/or forensic odontology, and appropriately retain specimens
    • Part A: ME 3.4 Seek assistance as needed when unanticipated findings or changing clinical circumstances are encountered
    • Part B: ME 2.5 Prepare written descriptions of the external, internal and microscopic findings in complex and/or pediatric cases
    • Part B: ME 3.4 Document procedures accurately 3 COM 4.3Communicate information appropriately, including evidence-informed opinions and conclusions, to law enforcement personnel, coroners/medical examiners, and lawyers

    Communicator

    • Part A: COM 1.5 Apply knowledge of cultural and religious accommodations in scheduling and techniques for post-mortem exams and death investigations ensuring that the death investigation is not compromised

    Leader

    • Part A: L 3.1 Engage personnel and procedures effectively in death investigations including maintaining the legal chain of custody of evidence

    Professional

    • Part A: P 3.1 Fulfil the requirements of the physician’s duty to report, including communicable disease and suspected child abuse

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-5

    Performing forensic autopsies of complex cases (homicides, criminally suspicious, complex medical, bodies rec…

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • Part A: ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of the principles of the various fields of forensic sciences, including toxicology, chemistry, biology (including DNA testing), firearm and tool mark examination, entomology, forensic photography, blood pattern analysis, fingerprint analysis, trace evidence and alternative light source examinations
    • Part A: ME 1.3 Demonstrate understanding of sections of the Canadian Criminal Code relevant to Forensic Pathology
    • Part A: ME 2.2 Select and interpret appropriate procedures based on information available
    • Part A: ME 2.5 Review the death scene information and clinical history in complex and/or pediatric cases
    • Part A: ME 2.6 Take or organize satisfactory external, gross and microscopic photographs of the post- mortem examination and any relevant tissues
    • Part A: ME 3.4 Seek assistance as needed when unanticipated findings or changing clinical circumstances are encountered
    • Part A: ME 4.1 Recognize the need for consultations, including but not limited to neuropathology, cardiovascular pathology, forensic anthropology and/or forensic odontology, and appropriately retain specimens
    • Part B: ME 2.5 Perform examination of tissue microscopically and review toxicology or other ancillary test results in complex and/or pediatric cases
    • Part B: ME 2.5 Prepare written descriptions of findings in complex and/or pediatric cases
    • Part B: ME 3.4 Document procedures accurately

    Communicator

    • Part A: COM 1.5 Apply knowledge of cultural and religious accommodations in scheduling and techniques for post-mortem exams and death investigations ensuring that the death investigation is not compromised
    • Part A: COM 4.3 Communicate information appropriately, including evidence-informed opinions and conclusions, to law enforcement personnel, coroners/medical examiners, and lawyers
    • Part B: COM 4.1 Adapt record keeping to the specific guidelines of Forensic Pathology and the medico-legal context

    Collaborator

    • Part A: COL 1.3 Provide timely and necessary written information to colleagues to enable effective relationship-centered services

    Leader

    • Part A: L 3.1 Engage personnel and procedures effectively in death investigations including maintaining the legal chain of custody of evidence

    Professional

    • Part A: P 3.1 Fulfil the requirements of the physician’s duty to report, including communicable disease and suspected child, domestic or elder abuse

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-6

    Formulating reports and documenting opinions of pediatric, and complex adult cases

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of the principles of histology and pathophysiology as they relate to Forensic Pathology
    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of the principles of the various fields of forensic sciences, including toxicology, chemistry, biology (including DNA testing), firearm and tool mark examination, entomology, forensic photography, blood pattern analysis, fingerprint analysis, trace evidence and alternative light source examinations
    • ME 1.6 Describe the information and limitations pathology can provide including but not limited to time of death determination
    • ME 2.5 Interpret post-mortem findings in light of the clinical history and/or scene investigation and appreciate potential limitations of such interpretations
    • ME 2.5 Formulate conclusions regarding cause and mechanism and manner of death in complex and/or pediatric cases
    • ME 4.1 Ensure follow-up on results of investigation and ancillary testing

    Communicator

    • COM 4.1 Document death investigations to support conclusion, reasoning, and the rationale for decisions and adequate detail to allow independent review

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.3 Provide timely and necessary written information to colleagues to enable effective relationship-centered services

    Scholar

    • S 3.3 Evaluate the applicability (external validity or generalizability) of evidence from a resource

    Professional

    • P 1.2 Demonstrate an appreciation of the limitations of findings, individual professional limits and the necessity of seeking appropriate second opinions

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-7

    Facilitating organ and tissue donation

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.3 Demonstrate awareness of relevant laws and regulations in relation to tissue/organ procurement, tissue retention, principles of consent, privacy and confidentiality
    • ME 1.6 Adapt as the complexity, uncertainty, and ambiguity of the situation evolves
    • ME 2.1 Determine whether organ or tissue donation will impair the forensic pathologist’s ability to provide an opinion
    • ME 3.1 Integrate potential organ and/or tissue donation into death investigation procedures

    Health Advocate

    • HA 2.1 Contribute to a process to improve health in the communities or populations they serve

    Professional

    • P 2.1 Demonstrate a commitment to the promotion of the public good, including stewardship of resources

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-8

    Managing multiple victim fatalities

    Key features and assessment plan

    - This EPA may be based on a real or simulated case

    Review, by supervisor, of resident’s submission of a brief report (oral or written) applying principles of managing multiple victim fatalities to a real or simulated case Use Form 1. Collect 1 observation of achievement

    Suggested observations: 1

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of principles of forensic anthropology and forensic odontology
    • ME 1.3 Demonstrate understanding of elementary issues of multiple victim incidents
    • ME 5.1 Prevent contamination of the death scene
    • ME 2.4 Maintain the chain of evidence in multiple victim fatalities
    • ME 3.2 Determine whether jurisdictional authorization applies in cases of multiple victim incidents
    • ME 2.3 Establish identification, with consultation where appropriate

    Communicator

    • COM 2.1 Integrate, summarize, and present the information obtained from a multiple victim death investigation, including disaster victim identification (DVI) form
    • COM 2.1 Seek and synthesize relevant information from other sources including the stakeholders, law enforcement personnel and medico-legal team

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.3 Demonstrate an interprofessional approach for death investigations (scene investigation, post-mortem examination, history, ancillary investigations)

    Leader

    • L 3.1 Ensure the appropriate transport of bodies in situations of multiple fatalities including consideration of storage and release of remains

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Manage complex issues while preserving confidentiality
    • P 4.1 Integrate skills that support adaptation and recovery in challenging situations

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-9

    Balancing clinical and other professional responsibilities

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.4 Act as a consultant to clinical colleagues, coroners, law enforcement personnel, judges and lawyers, on the interpretation and relevance of pathological findings

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.2 Consult as needed with other health care professionals, including other physicians
    • COL 2.1 Delegate tasks and responsibilities in an appropriate and respectful manner

    Leader

    • L 2.2 Optimize practice patterns for cost-effectiveness and cost control
    • L 3.1 Engage personnel and procedures effectively in death investigations including maintaining the legal chain of custody of evidence

    Scholar

    • S 1.2 Seek and interpret multiple sources of performance data and feedback, with guidance, to continually improve performance
    • S 3.1 Generate focused questions that address practice uncertainty and knowledge gaps
    • S 3.3 Evaluate the applicability (external validity or generalizability) of evidence from a resource
    • S 3.4 Identify new evidence appropriate to their scope of professional practice through quality-appraised evidence-alerting services

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Complete assigned responsibilities
    • P 2.1 Demonstrate a commitment to the promotion of the public good, including stewardship of resources
    • P 2.1 Demonstrate a commitment to maintaining and enhancing competence
    • P 4.2 Manage competing personal and professional priorities

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-10

    Conducting peer review of cases

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Scholar

    • S 1.2 Participate in peer review for purposes of personal practice improvement

    Professional

    • P 1.2 Demonstrate an appreciation of the limitations of findings, individual professional limits and the necessity of seeking appropriate second opinions
    • P 3.3 Participate in the review of practice, standard setting and quality improvement activities
    • P 3.3 Demonstrate a commitment to excellence in the discipline by participating in regular peer-review

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-11

    Providing clinical supervision for technical staff and junior learners

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Scholar

    • S 2.1 Use strategies for deliberate, positive role-modelling
    • S 2.2 Ensure a safe learning environment for all members of the team
    • S 2.3 Identify situations involving learners where the death investigation may be compromised, and manage them appropriately
    • S 2.3 Supervise learners to ensure they work within limits, seeking guidance and supervision when needed
    • S 2.4 Describe teaching strategies relevant to their discipline
    • S 2.4 Identify the learning needs and desired learning outcomes of others
    • S 2.5 Provide written or verbal feedback to other learners, faculty and other members of the team

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-12

    Delivering formal teaching sessions

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of the clinical and biomedical sciences as well as issues of medical jurisprudence relevant to Forensic Pathology

    Scholar

    • S 2.4 Define specific learning objectives for a teaching activity
    • S 2.4 Identify the learning needs and desired learning outcomes of others
    • S 2.4 Plan, prepare and deliver a learning activity
    • S 3.3 Evaluate the applicability (external validity or generalizability) of evidence from a resource
    • S 3.4 Identify new evidence appropriate to their scope of professional practice through quality-appraised evidence-alerting services

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Demonstrate respect for the deceased and the death investigation in publications and teaching presentations

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • C-13

    Completing a scholarly activity

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Scholar

    • S 4.4 Pose medically and scientifically relevant and appropriately constructed questions amenable to scholarly investigation
    • S 3.3 Evaluate the applicability (external validity or generalizability) of evidence from a resource
    • S 4.1 Contribute to a scholarly investigation or the dissemination of research findings in their discipline
    • S 4.2 Discuss and provide examples of the ethical principles applicable to research and scholarly inquiry relevant to Forensic Pathology
    • S 4.3 Actively participate as a research team member, balancing the roles and responsibilities of a researcher with the roles and responsibilities of a physician
    • S 4.4 Select appropriate methods of addressing a given scholarly question
    • S 4.5 Summarize and communicate the findings of applicable research and scholarly inquiry to professional and lay audiences, including stakeholders

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

Transition to Practice

  • TTP-1

    Performing death investigations

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.2 Assess a death scene
    • ME 3.2 Ensure appropriate legal authority is obtained for procedures
    • ME 3.1 Determine the most appropriate procedures to accurately assess cause, manner and mechanism of death
    • ME 2.5 Perform a complete post-mortem examination in a range of natural and unnatural deaths, with appropriate description of the external and internal findings, including gross and microscopic examinations
    • ME 2.5 Identify the circumstances when toxicological and other ancillary investigations/tests may be appropriate, and apply the procedures for sampling tissues, fluids and other evidence for these additional investigations
    • ME 2.5 Interpret post-mortem findings in light of the clinical history and/or scene investigation and appreciate potential limitations of such interpretations
    • ME 2.6 Take or organize satisfactory external, gross and microscopic photographs of the post- mortem examination and any relevant tissues
    • ME 3.3 Prioritize a procedure, taking into account potential for deterioration of evidence, and available resources
    • ME 3.4 Perform procedures in a skillful and safe manner, adapting to unanticipated findings or changing circumstances
    • ME 4.1 Implement a plan that supports ongoing cases, follow-up on investigations, response to stakeholder needs, and further consultation

    Communicator

    • COM 4.1 Document death investigations in an accurate, complete, timely and accessible manner, and in compliance with legal and privacy requirements
    • COM 4.3 Communicate information appropriately, including evidence-informed opinions and conclusions, to law enforcement personnel, coroners/medical examiners, and lawyers

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.3 Demonstrate an interprofessional approach for a death investigation (scene investigation, post-mortem examination, history, ancillary investigations)

    Leader

    • L 1.2 Consistently apply the principles of laboratory safety and universal precautions

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviours
    • P 3.1 Fulfil and adhere to the professional and ethical codes, standards of practice, and laws governing practice

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTP-2

    Organizing the daily workload of the FP unit

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 2.1 Prioritize which issues need to be addressed during death investigation or with other investigators
    • ME 1.5 Carry out professional duties in the face of multiple, competing demands
    • ME 1.5 Prioritize cases on the basis of case complexity
    • ME 3.3 Prioritize a procedure taking into account potential for deterioration of evidence, and available resources

    Communicator

    • COM 1.5 Apply knowledge of cultural and religious accommodations in scheduling and techniques for post-mortem exams and death investigations ensuring that the death investigation is not compromised

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.2 Coordinate scheduling with external stakeholders agencies and collaborators
    • COL 1.3 Demonstrate an interprofessional approach for death investigations (scene investigation, post-mortem examination, history, ancillary investigations)
    • COL 2.1 Delegate tasks and responsibilities in an appropriate and respectful manner

    Leader

    • L 2.1 Allocate resources for optimal delivery of services
    • L 3.1 Engage personnel and procedures effectively in death investigations including maintaining the legal chain of custody of evidence

    Health Advocate

    • HA 3.1 Fulfil and adhere to the professional and ethical codes, standards of practice, and laws governing practice

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTP-3

    Managing the caseload of a forensic pathologist

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.1 Demonstrate a commitment to high-quality delivery of services
    • ME 1.2 Integrate the CanMEDS Intrinsic Roles into their practice of Forensic Pathology
    • ME 1.5 Carry out professional duties in the face of multiple, competing demands

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.2 Negotiate overlapping and shared responsibilities with physicians and other colleagues in medico-legal team 5 S 1.2Participate in peer review for purposes of personal practice improvement

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviours
    • P 1.2 Demonstrate a commitment to excellence in all aspects of practice
    • P 4.2 Manage personal and professional demands for a sustainable practice throughout the Forensic Pathologist life cycle

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTP-4

    Consulting for the criminal and civil justice system

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 1.3 Demonstrate understanding of sections of the Canadian Criminal Code relevant to Forensic Pathology
    • ME 1.4 Act as a consultant to clinical colleagues, coroners, law enforcement personnel, judges, lawyers, on the interpretation and relevance of pathological findings

    Communicator

    • COM 4.3 Communicate information appropriately, including evidence-informed opinions and conclusions, to law enforcement personnel, coroners/medical examiners, and lawyers

    Scholar

    • S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and expertise into decision-making

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviours
    • P 1.2 Demonstrate an appreciation of the limitations of findings, individual professional limits and the necessity of seeking appropriate second opinions
    • P 3.1 Demonstrate an understanding of the criminal, civil and inquest procedures, the role of the Crown and the defense, and the rules of evidence
    • P 3.1 Demonstrate the legal, ethical and behavioural requirements when testifying

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTP-5

    Managing the physical and psychological safety of staff

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Medical Expert

    • ME 5.2 Adopt strategies that promote safety and address human and system factors
    • ME 5.2 Demonstrate knowledge of reportable and communicable infectious diseases and determine the need for communication with the appropriate authorities
    • ME 5.2 Demonstrate safe techniques for high risk autopsies

    Collaborator

    • COL 1.1 Establish and maintain healthy relationships with physician and other colleagues in the medico-legal team to support relationship-centered collaborative services
    • COL 1.1 Anticipate, identify, and respond to safety issues related to the function of a team

    Leader

    • L 1.2 Apply the principles of laboratory safety and universal precautions consistently
    • L 1.2 Actively encourage all involved in death investigation, regardless of their role, to report and respond to unsafe situations

    Professional

    • P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviours
    • P 4.3 Promote a culture that recognizes, supports, and responds effectively to colleagues in need

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTP-6

    Developing a learning plan for first 3-5 years of practice

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Scholar

    • S 1.1 Develop, implement, monitor, and revise a personal learning plan to enhance professional practice
    • S 1.2 Identify opportunities for learning and improvement by regularly reflecting on and assessing their performance using various internal and external data sources
    • S 2.5 Role-model regular self-assessment and feedback-seeking behaviour
    • S 3.3 Critically evaluate the integrity, reliability, and applicability of medico-legal research and literature
    • S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and expertise into decision-making

    Professional

    • P 2.1 Demonstrate a commitment to maintaining and enhancing competence

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.

  • TTP-7

    Developing and maintaining a professional curriculum vitae

    Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)

    1. I had to do
    2. I had to talk them through
    3. I needed to prompt
    4. I needed to be there just in case
    5. I didn’t need to be there

    Leader

    • L 4.2 Develop and maintain a curriculum vitae with formatting and content appropriate for use in medico-legal proceedings

    Case description

    Feedback provided

    Next steps

    Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.