Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada · 1.0 · 19 EPAs
Also available in French.
Every EPA in the published guide, shown as the form DebriefMD fills in, with its fields and answer options.
Transition to Discipline
TTD-1
Assessing patients with a possible adverse drug event and/or toxin exposure
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA applies the skills attained in the entry specialty to the context of CPT patient presentations. - This includes clinical assessment, determination of patient acuity, and selection of initial investigations. - An important feature of this EPA is the timely and appropriate recognition of the need for additional assistance or expertise. - This EPA may be observed in an inpatient, outpatient, or telemedicine setting (e.g. poison centre).
Direct observation, review of recorded telemedicine call (poison centre), or case review by faculty supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Demographic (select all that apply): pediatric; adult; geriatric; bariatric; maternal- fetal; critically ill; anesthesia; other - Clinical presentation (write in): - Setting: inpatient; outpatient; telemedicine - Type of observation: direct; telemedicine call review; case review Collect 4 observations of achievement - At least 2 observations differing in demographics or clinical issues - At least 2 direct observations or telemedicine (poison centre) call reviews
Suggested observations: 4
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Demographic
- pediatric
- adult
- geriatric
- bariatric
- maternal- fetal
- critically ill
- anesthesia
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 2.1 Recognize instability and medical acuity in a clinical presentation
- ME 1.4 Recognize urgent problems and seek assistance CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (2021)
- ME 2.2 Elicit a history and perform a physical exam that informs the diagnosis
- ME 2.2 Elicit a comprehensive history of drug/toxin exposure
- ME 2.2 Select appropriate initial diagnostic tests
- ME 2.2 Develop a differential diagnosis
- ME 1.4 Perform the assessment in a timely manner
Communicator
- COM 1.1 Establish rapport with the patient
- COM 2.1 Conduct the interview in a patient-centred manner
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with other physicians and health care professionals CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (2021)
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
TTD-2
Documenting clinical encounters
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the application of written communication skills to clearly convey recommendations regarding investigation and/or management. - This EPA does not include oral communication and discussions with the referring physician/service, patients or family. - This EPA may be observed in any setting.
Review of clinical documentation by faculty supervisor, which may include input from referring service Use Form 1 Collect 4 observations of achievement
Suggested observations: 4
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Communicator
- COM 5.1 Organize information in appropriate sections
- COM 5.1 Document all relevant findings
- COM 5.1 Convey clinical reasoning, and rationale for decisions and/or recommendations
- COM 5.1 Document the plan for ongoing management
- COM 5.1 Complete clinical documentation in a timely manner CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (2021)
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
TTD-3
Using specialized testing for individual patients
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on identifying indications for specialized testing and selecting the appropriate test for the individual patient with attention to the judicious use of health care resources. - This includes therapeutic drug monitoring, and pharmacogenetic, phenotypic, or toxicologic testing in clinical pharmacology and toxicology practice across all its domains. - This EPA may be observed in any clinical setting.
Case review by faculty supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Type of test (write in): - Clinical problem (write in): Collect 2 observations of achievement - 2 different clinical presentations based on type of test or clinical problem
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Perform a focused clinical assessment
- ME 2.2 Determine if specialized testing is indicated
- ME 2.2 Select the most appropriate testing strategy, including follow-up testing
- ME 3.3 Triage testing, taking into account clinical urgency, potential for deterioration, and available resources
Leader
- L 2.1 Consider costs when selecting specialized testing CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (2021)
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
Foundations
F-1
Assessing and providing initial management for patients with a possible adverse drug event/toxin exposure
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on assessing a patient’s clinical stability and their potential to become unstable (risk assessment), initiating resuscitation if relevant, and providing or arranging for initial management. At this stage it does not include providing or arranging for definitive care. - It also includes recognizing non-toxic presentations and distinguishing them from toxic exposures. - Examples include patients with: skin rash from antibiotics; angioedema from ACE- inhibitors; bleeding from anticoagulants; acetaminophen self-poisoning; chronic digoxin toxicity; suspected toxic alcohol exposure; and iron overdose. - An important aspect of this EPA is recognizing the gravity of the situation, knowing one’s own limits, and seeking assistance as appropriate via accessing needed resources or contacting senior staff. - This EPA may be observed in the inpatient, outpatient, or telemedicine setting.
Direct observation, review of recorded telemedicine call (poison centre), or case review by faculty supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Demographic (select all that apply): pediatric; adult; geriatric; bariatric; maternal- fetal; critically ill; anesthesia; other - Clinical presentation/exposure (write in): - Type of observation: direct; telemedicine call review; case review Collect 4 observations of achievement - 4 different clinical presentations based on demographics or clinical problem - At least 1 direct observation CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (2021)
Suggested observations: 4
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Demographic
- pediatric
- adult
- geriatric
- bariatric
- maternal- fetal
- critically ill
- anesthesia
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of pharmacology, toxicology and clinical sciences to manage patient presentations involving adverse drug reactions and toxic exposures
- ME 1.4 Recognize urgent problems and seek assistance
- ME 2.2 Develop a differential diagnosis
- ME 2.2 Select and interpret appropriate investigations
- ME 2.2 Distinguish a potentially toxic from assuredly non-toxic exposure
- ME 2.4 Recommend or implement initial supportive and specific management
Communicator
- COM 5.1 Document the clinical assessment and management plan CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (2021)
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-2
Providing recommendations for pharmacotherapeutic management
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on a complete assessment and provision of recommendations to the patient and/or referring health care provider. - This may include the domains of adherence, harm/benefit assessment, pharmacogenetics, common drug interactions, or drug reactions. - At this stage this does not include complex patients or scenarios such as organ dysfunction, uncommon drug interactions or special populations (maternal-fetal, pediatric, critically ill, geriatric, bariatric). - This EPA may be observed in any clinical setting.
Direct observation or case review by faculty supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Demographic (select all that apply): pediatric; adult; geriatric; bariatric; maternal- fetal; critically ill; anesthesia; other - Clinical presentation (write in): - Type of observation: direct; case review Collect 2 observations of achievement - 2 different clinical presentations - At least 1 direct observation
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Demographic
- pediatric
- adult
- geriatric
- bariatric
- maternal- fetal
- critically ill
- anesthesia
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 2.2 Gather a complete history, including full medication history and adherence
- ME 2.2 Identify significant drug interactions
- ME 2.2 Recommend appropriate testing, including pharmacogenetics and drug concentration levels
- ME 2.2 Assess likelihood of benefit and harm for all medications
- ME 2.4 Develop a management plan
- ME 2.4 Ensure that the patient and family are informed about the risks and benefits of each treatment option in the context of best evidence and guidelines
- ME 2.4 Discuss with the patient and family the degree of diagnostic uncertainty inherent to the clinical situation
Communicator
- COM 5.1 Document the clinical assessment and management plan
- COM 4.1 Explore the perspectives of the patient and others when developing care plans, including identifying barriers to adherence
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Convey information to the referring health care provider in a manner that enhances patient management CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (2021)
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-3
Using information technology and resources to resolve clinical questions
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on resolving questions that arise in the context of clinical work by selecting, accessing, and appraising the appropriateness and quality of sources of information. - Examples of resources include drug interaction tables, primary research papers, databases, and decision support tools. - The observation of this EPA is based on oral presentation to a supervisor, which must include a description of the search strategy and resources used to obtain information and arrive at an opinion.
Review with faculty supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Clinical scenario (write in): - Type of resource (write in): Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 different electronic resources
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Scholar
- S 3.1 Recognize knowledge gaps arising from a clinical encounter
- S 3.3 Apply knowledge of available resources to select appropriate sources
- S 3.3 Develop and execute an effective search strategy
- S 3.3 Critically evaluate the reliability and quality of resources
- S 3.4 Integrate findings to address the clinical question CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (2021)
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-4
Critically appraising original research in Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology
Key features and assessment plan
- The focus of this EPA is the application of critical appraisal skills. - This EPA may be observed in a clinical or academic setting (such as journal club, rounds presentation). - Multiple observers may document their observations of the same presentation.
Direct and/or indirect observation by faculty (clinical and non-clinical) based on discussion and/or presentation of findings Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Type of article: case-control; cohort; randomized control trial; systematic review; other study design Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 research designs - Must be 2 separate occasions
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Type of article
- case-control
- cohort
- randomized control trial
- systematic review
- other study design
Scholar
- S 3.2 Identify and select relevant high-quality articles pertinent to the field
- S 3.3 Apply the concepts of internal and external validity
- S 3.3 Recognize and evaluate sources of bias, including conflicts of interest
- S 3.3 Assess the level of evidence quality
- S 3.1 Identify remaining gaps in knowledge and questions for further investigation
- S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise
- S 3.3 Interpret study findings and critique their relevance to clinical practice
- S 2.4 Present the information in an organized manner CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (2021)
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-5
Conveying information about specialized testing to patients and/or families
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on applying knowledge of the rationale for and against specialized testing, as well as communication skills and strategies for shared decision-making to help the patient and/or family make an informed decision. - This may include obtaining consent where appropriate. - This EPA may be observed in any clinical setting.
Direct observation by faculty supervisor Use Form 1 Collect 2 observations of achievement
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of laboratory methodologies in CPT
- ME 3.2 Describe proposed specialized testing to the patient/family, including the benefits, harms, and cost effectiveness of each testing option
- ME 2.4 Discuss with the patient and family the degree of diagnostic uncertainty inherent to the clinical situation
Communicator
- COM 3.1 Use appropriate language and avoid medical jargon
- COM 3.1 Verify understanding of the information conveyed
- COM 4.3 Answer questions from the patient and family
- COM 4.3 Use communication skills and strategies that help the patient and/or family make an informed decision
- COM 5.1 Document the consent discussion CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (2021)
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-6
Working effectively with other services
Key features and assessment plan
- The focus of this EPA is collegial respectful interaction with another health care professional/team to effectively communicate consultant recommendations. - This EPA will be observed by a faculty supervisor and should incorporate other perspectives (i.e. feedback from consulting service).
Direct observation and/or case review by faculty supervisor, with input from other health care professionals Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Feedback from recipient of consult included: yes; no - Type of observation: direct; case review Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 1 direct observation
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Feedback from recipient of consult included
- yes
- no
Type of observation
- direct
- case review
Medical Expert
- ME 2.1 Establish the nature of the clinical question
- ME 1.1 Demonstrate responsibility and accountability for patient care
Collaborator
- COL 1.1 Establish positive relationships with referring physicians
- COL 1.2 Convey the role of the CPT consultant, and if relevant, the boundaries applicable to the consultant role
- COL 1.3 Convey information to the referring health care provider in a manner that enhances patient management
- COL 1.3 Encourage discussion, questions and interaction relevant to the case
Health Advocate
- HA 1.1 Facilitate access to specialized testing, resources, and services
Professional
- P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviours CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (2021)
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-7
Advancing the discipline and/or patient care through scholarly activity: Planning
Key features and assessment plan
- At this stage the resident’s involvement must include at least two of the following: generation of a question, preliminary literature review, and/or proposed plan (including REB if applicable); or equivalent defined a priori at the discretion of the program director. - This EPA includes scholarly activities related to clinical or basic science research, patient safety, quality improvement, or education. - The observation of this EPA is based on the submission of a scholarly project proposal in written format.
Review of documents and written proposal by project or research supervisor Use Form 1 Collect 1 observation of achievement
Suggested observations: 1
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Leader
- L 4.1 Organize work to manage clinical, scholarly, and other responsibilities
Scholar
- S 4.4 Pose questions that are appropriately constructed and amenable to scholarly inquiry
- S 3.3 Evaluate the applicability (external validity or generalizability) of evidence
- S 4.5 Summarize the findings of a literature review
- S 4.4 Select appropriate methods of addressing a scholarly question
- S 4.2 Apply the principles of research ethics, as appropriate to the scholarly project
- S 4.4 Propose a research question that is medically and scientifically relevant and demonstrates societal benefit
- S 4.3 Work effectively with other members of the project team, including project supervisor
Professional
- P 1.2 Demonstrate a commitment to excellence in all aspects of scholarly activity CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (2021)
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
Core
C-1
Assessing and providing comprehensive management for patients with a suspected adverse drug reaction
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA builds on the skills of the Foundations stage to add complexity with consideration of drug interactions, pharmacogenomics, patients with organ dysfunction, and special populations such as maternal-fetal, pediatric, critically ill, geriatric, or bariatric patients. - It includes comprehensiveness in recommendations, evaluation of causality and differential diagnosis, investigation, and follow-up. - This EPA includes drug exposure at therapeutic dosing, such as delayed hypersensitivity, drug allergy, drug-induced liver injury and other direct organ toxicities. - It does not include overdose or adverse drug events associated with errors of pharmacotherapy. - This EPA may be observed in the inpatient, outpatient, telemedicine, or simulation setting.
Direct observation or case review by faculty supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Demographic (select all that apply): pediatric; adult; geriatric; bariatric; maternal- fetal; critically ill; anesthesia; other - Complexity: low; medium; high - Complexity descriptors (write in): - Clinical presentation (write in): - Observation: direct; case review; simulation Collect 6 observations of achievement - At least 2 different demographics - At least 2 of high complexity - At least 2 observers - No more than 1 simulation
Suggested observations: 6
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Demographic
- pediatric
- adult
- geriatric
- bariatric
- maternal- fetal
- critically ill
- anesthesia
- other
Complexity
- low
- medium
- high
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Perform a clinical assessment that addresses all relevant issues
- ME 2.2 Gather information about medications, use of complementary and alternative medicines and the underlying condition(s)
- ME 2.2 Evaluate causality and differential diagnosis
- ME 2.4 Develop a management plan CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (2021)
- ME 2.4 Identify risk of drug re-challenging and provide advice on continuation/discontinuation of drugs
Communicator
- COM 3.1 Provide information on diagnosis and prognosis to the patient/family clearly and compassionately
- COM 4.3 Answer questions from the patient and family
- COM 5.1 Document the clinical encounter to adequately convey the assessment, recommendations and the rationale for decisions CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (2021)
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Convey information from the CPT consultation in a manner that enhances patient management
Health Advocate
- HA 1.1 Facilitate access to specialized testing, resources, and services
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-2
Assessing and providing comprehensive management recommendations for patients with a drug overdose and/or to…
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA includes assessing the patient’s clinical status, risk for deterioration and the underlying toxidrome/causal entity, and providing recommendations for supportive and definitive therapy, including antidotal therapy and all routes of elimination. - This includes the full breadth of possible exposures and patients, including drug interactions, pharmacogenomic considerations, organ dysfunction, and special populations such as maternal-fetal, pediatric, critically ill, geriatric, or bariatric patients. - It includes intentional and unintentional overdose, and drug/toxin exposures by any route (oral, inhalational, dermal, etc.), including acute and chronic exposures. - This EPA may be observed in the inpatient, outpatient, telemedicine, or simulation setting.
Direct observation and/or case review by faculty supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Demographic (select all that apply): pediatric; adult; geriatric; bariatric; maternal- fetal; critically ill; anesthesia; other - Clinical presentation (write in): - Complexity: low; medium; high - Complexity descriptor (write in): - Observation: direct; case review; simulation Collect 6 observations of achievement - At least 2 different demographics - At least 2 high complexity - At least 2 observers - No more than 1 simulation
Suggested observations: 6
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Demographic
- pediatric
- adult
- geriatric
- bariatric
- maternal- fetal
- critically ill
- anesthesia
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Perform a clinical assessment that addresses all relevant issues
- ME 2.2 Gather information about the exposure/causal entity, including extent of exposure, timing, and any concomitant exposures or ingestions
- ME 2.2 Gather information about any co-morbidities and other factors that may impact the patient’s outcome
- ME 2.1 Assess the clinical urgency and potential for deterioration
- ME 2.4 Develop a plan for supportive care, decontamination, antidotal therapy and/or enhanced elimination as appropriate CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (2021)
- ME 2.4 Determine the need to transfer/transport the patient
Communicator
- COM 3.1 Provide information on diagnosis and prognosis to the patient/family clearly and compassionately
- COM 4.3 Answer questions from the patient and family
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Convey information from the CPT consultation in a manner that enhances patient management
- COL 1.3 Support clinical colleagues in the development and implementation of a management plan CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (2021)
Health Advocate
- HA 1.1 Facilitate access to specialized testing, resources, and services
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-3
Providing comprehensive recommendations for pharmacotherapeutic management
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA builds on the skills of the Foundations stage to add complexity with consideration of drug interactions, pharmacogenomics, polypharmacy and deprescribing. It includes patients with organ dysfunction and special populations such as maternal-fetal, pediatric, critically ill, geriatric, or bariatric patients. - This EPA includes therapeutics within any of the entry disciplines of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology but is intended to capture the most complex clinical scenarios. - This EPA may be observed in the inpatient, outpatient, telemedicine, or simulation setting.
Direct observation and/or case review by faculty supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Demographic (select all that apply): pediatric; adult; geriatric; bariatric; maternal- fetal; critically ill; anesthesia; other - Clinical presentation (write in): - Complexity: low; medium; high - Complexity descriptor (write in): - Type of observation: direct; case review; simulation Collect 6 observations of achievement - At least 2 different demographics - At least 4 high complexity - At least 2 observers
Suggested observations: 6
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Demographic
- pediatric
- adult
- geriatric
- bariatric
- maternal- fetal
- critically ill
- anesthesia
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Perform a clinical assessment that addresses all relevant issues
- ME 2.2 Identify potentially inappropriate medications and significant drug interactions
- ME 2.2 Recommend appropriate testing, including pharmacogenetics and drug concentration levels
- ME 3.4 Apply pharmacological principles to guide therapeutic management
- ME 2.4 Develop a plan for rational prescribing and management based on individual drug and patient characteristics
- ME 4.1 Establish plans for monitoring the patient and treatment efficacy
Communicator
- COM 4.3 Answer questions from the patient and family CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (2021)
- COM 5.1 Document the clinical encounter to adequately convey the assessment, recommendations and the rationale for decisions CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (2021)
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Convey information from the CPT consultation in a manner that enhances patient management
Health Advocate
- HA 1.1 Facilitate access to specialized testing, resources, and services
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-4
Advising other clinicians on the selection and interpretation of specialized testing
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on applying knowledge of pharmacology and toxicology laboratory tests and procedures to act as a consultant to other clinicians when they need assistance selecting investigations or applying the results of investigations to patient care. - This may include therapeutic drug monitoring (e.g. serum drug concentration), toxicologic testing (e.g. urine drug screen, broad spectrum drug testing), or pharmacogenetic testing. - This EPA includes promoting the judicious use of laboratory resources.
Direct observation or case review by faculty supervisor, with input from laboratory personnel (including medical biochemist, or laboratory personnel, etc.) Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Type of test: therapeutic drug monitoring; toxicologic testing; pharmacogenetic testing; other test - Type of observation: direct; case review Collect 6 observations of achievement - At least 1 toxicologic investigation - At least 1 therapeutic drug monitoring
Suggested observations: 6
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Type of test
- therapeutic drug monitoring
- toxicologic testing
- pharmacogenetic testing
- other test
Type of observation
- direct
- case review
Medical Expert
- ME 2.1 Establish the nature of the clinical question
- ME 3.4 Provide guidance on the most appropriate selection, sequence and/or timing of pharmacologic, toxicologic and/or pharmacogenomics testing
Communicator
- COM 2.3 Gather patient information from another health professional
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Support clinical colleagues in the development and implementation of a management plan
- COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with other physicians and health care professionals
Leader
- L 2.1 Use specialized tests in a cost-effective manner
Health Advocate
- HA 1.1 Respond to individual patient diagnostic needs and issues as part of patient care CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (2021)
Scholar
- S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise into decision-making
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-5
Advancing the discipline and/or patient care through scholarly activity: Performing
Key features and assessment plan
- At this stage the resident’s involvement must include all of the following: completion of data acquisition, analysis, and synthesis; or equivalent defined a priori at the discretion of the program director. - This EPA includes scholarly activities related to clinical or basic science research, patient safety, quality improvement, or education. - The observation of this EPA is based on review of interim reports (including posters, write-ups, or presentations).
Review of interim reports by project or research supervisor Use Form 1 Collect 1 observation of achievement
Suggested observations: 1
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Leader
- L 4.1 Organize work to manage clinical, scholarly, and other responsibilities
Scholar
- S 4.4 Consult and collaborate with content experts and other members of the team in the conduct of scholarly work
- S 4.2 Apply the principles of research ethics, as appropriate to the scholarly project
- S 4.5 Summarize the findings of a literature review
- S 4.4 Collect data for a scholarly project
- S 4.4 Perform data analysis as appropriate
- S 4.5 Prepare interim reports suitable for review
Professional
- P 1.2 Demonstrate a commitment to excellence in all aspects of scholarly activity CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (2021)
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-6
Delivering scholarly teaching to a variety of audiences
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the skills of critical appraisal, as well as presentation and teaching skills. - It includes scholarly teaching to peers, junior trainees, other health professionals, and the public. - This EPA may be observed in formal (grand rounds, journal club, etc.) or informal presentation environments. - This EPA should reflect a substantial amount of preparation in designing the educational intervention.
Direct observation by faculty supervisor (not necessarily CPT), incorporating feedback from other audience members Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Topic (write in): - Audience (select all that apply): residents/medical students; pharmacologists/toxicologists; patients and/or families; public; other health care professionals - Setting: grand rounds; journal club; other formal teaching; informal teaching Collect 6 observations of achievement - At least 1 oral presentation to a large group setting - At least 3 other teaching sessions - At least 2 different observers
Suggested observations: 6
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Scholar
- S 2.4 Identify the learning needs and desired learning outcomes of others
- S 2.4 Develop learning objectives for a teaching activity
- S 3.3 Critically evaluate the integrity, reliability and applicability of health related research and literature
- S 2.4 Adapt the vocabulary and presentation to the audience
- S 2.4 Present the information in an organized manner
- S 2.4 Use audiovisual aids effectively
- S 2.4 Provide adequate time for questions and discussion
- S 2.2 Create a positive and safe learning environment CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (2021)
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-7
Reporting adverse drug events to the appropriate surveillance body
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the professional responsibility and regulatory processes of reporting adverse drug events to the appropriate institutional and regulatory bodies. - It includes recognition of clinical events that require reporting and undertaking the necessary steps for reporting. - This EPA may be observed in any clinical setting or in a simulated scenario.
Case review by faculty supervisor with input from multidisciplinary team/pharmacist. This may also include review of the completed report Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Reporting system: Health Canada; local hospital; Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP); manufacturer; other Collect 4 observations of achievement - At least 1 report via Health Canada reporting system - At least 1 report via local hospital reporting system
Suggested observations: 4
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Reporting system
- Health Canada
- local hospital
- Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP)
- manufacturer
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 5.1 Recognize and diagnose an adverse drug reaction
- ME 5.1 Mitigate further injury from an adverse event, as appropriate
- ME 1.3 Apply knowledge of the Canadian framework for pharmacovigilance and reporting requirements
- ME 5.1 Report an adverse event as per institutional process and/or governmental regulations
Communicator
- COM 3.2 Disclose a patient safety incident and/or unanticipated clinical outcomes to a patient/family
- COM 4.3 Answer questions from the patient and family
Leader
- L 1.3 Analyze an adverse drug event to guide process improvement CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (2021)
Professional
- P 3.1 Fulfill professional regulatory and legal requirements regarding reporting adverse drug events
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
Transition to Practice
TTP-1
Leading the provision of care for patients on an inpatient and/or outpatient service
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA includes all aspects of leading an inpatient and/or outpatient consultation service (including poison centre) including triage of urgent consultation requests, medical decision-making for individual patients, and working effectively with other services. - This EPA also includes organizing the daily workload, teaching and providing feedback to the other learners on the team. - This EPA may be observed in any clinical setting. - The observation of this EPA is not based on a single patient encounter, but rather on the resident performance over a period of at least one week.
Direct and indirect observation by faculty supervisor with input from other members of the team Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Setting (select all that apply): inpatient; outpatient; poison centre; other setting Collect 2 observations of achievement
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Setting
- inpatient
- outpatient
- poison centre
- other setting
Medical Expert
- ME 1.5 Triage consultation requests based on clinical acuity
- ME 1.1 Demonstrate responsibility and accountability for patient care within the boundaries and expectations of the consultant role
- ME 4.1 Coordinate investigation, treatment and follow-up when multiple physicians and health care professionals are involved
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with other physicians and health care professionals
Leader
- L 4.2 Carry out clinical, administrative, supervisory and teaching responsibilities in a time-effective manner
- L 2.1 Allocate health care resources for optimal patient care
Health Advocate
- HA 1.1 Facilitate timely patient access to services and resources
Scholar
- S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise into decision-making
- S 2.3 Balance supervision and graduated responsibility, ensuring the safety of patients and learners
- S 2.1 Recognize the influence of role-modelling and the impact of the formal, informal, and hidden curriculum on learners CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (2021)
Professional
- P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviours
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
TTP-2
Advancing the discipline and/or patient care through scholarly activity: Disseminating
Key features and assessment plan
- At this stage, the resident’s involvement must include at least four of the following: generation of question/hypothesis, literature review, project design including protocol and ethics application, data collection, data analysis/statistics, data synthesis; or equivalent defined a priori at the discretion of the program director. - This EPA includes scholarly activities related to clinical or basic science research, patient safety, quality improvement, or education. - The assessment of this EPA is based on the submission of a scholarly project, in manuscript and presentation form. It may also include observing the presentation of the scholarly work by the resident at a local, national, or international meeting.
Direct observation and review of project submission by project or research supervisor or coordinator Use Form 1 Collect 1 observation of achievement
Suggested observations: 1
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Leader
- L 4.1 Organize work to manage clinical, scholarly, and other responsibilities
Scholar
- S 4.4 Consult and collaborate with content experts and other members of the team in the conduct of scholarly work
- S 4.2 Apply the principles of research ethics, as appropriate to the scholarly project
- S 4.4 Integrate existing literature and findings of data collection
- S 4.4 Identify areas for further investigation
- S 4.5 Summarize and communicate the findings of research and scholarly inquiry
- S 4.5 Prepare a completed work suitable for dissemination in an appropriate medium/forum
Professional
- P 1.2 Demonstrate a commitment to excellence in all aspects of scholarly activity
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2020 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.