Cardiac Surgery
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada · 1.0 · 54 EPAs
Also available in French.
Every EPA in the published guide, shown as the form DebriefMD fills in, with its fields and answer options.
Transition to Discipline
TTD-1
Performing sternotomies in uncomplicated patients
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses only on the surgical aspects of the procedure in uncomplicated (low complexity) patients - This EPA may be observed during any operation that requires a sternotomy
Direct observation by supervisor (surgeon, senior surgical assistant, senior resident/fellow) Use form 2 (with O-score criteria). Form collects information on - Case complexity: low; medium; high Collect 2 observations
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Case complexity
- low
- medium
- high
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
TTD-2
Harvesting one segment of the saphenous vein
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses only on the surgical aspects of the procedure in uncomplicated (low complexity) patients - This EPA may be observed during any operation that requires harvesting the saphenous vein
Direct observation by supervisor (surgeon, senior surgical assistant, senior resident/fellow) Use Form 2 (with O-score criteria). Form collects information on - Case complexity: low; medium; high - Side: right; left Collect 5 observations of achievement - At least 2 assessors
Suggested observations: 5
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Case complexity
- low
- medium
- high
Side
- right
- left
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
Foundations
F-1
Assessing patients being considered for cardiac surgery, interpreting cardiac investigations and assessing …
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on a comprehensive clinical assessment of patients with common cardiac conditions, with generation of a management plan considering both medical and surgical options for care - This EPA includes patients with any of the following conditions: coronary artery disease; valvular heart disease; disease of the thoracic aorta; pericardial disease; hemothorax; pleural effusion - The observation of this EPA is divided into 2 parts: direct observation of the history and physical exam; review of clinical assessment and management plans
Part A: History and physical Direct observation by supervisor Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Setting: clinic; ward - Presentation: coronary artery disease; valvular heart disease; other - Case complexity: low; medium; high Collect 4 observations of achievement - At least 2 coronary artery disease - At least 2 valvular disease - At least 1 patient with medium or high complexity - At least 2 assessors Part B: Clinical assessment Indirect observation by supervisor (case discussion and review of imaging) Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Setting: clinic; ward - Presentation: coronary artery disease; valvular heart disease; disease of thoracic aorta; pleural pathology; other Collect 10 observations of achievement - At least 1 of each presentation - At least 3 assessors
Suggested observations: 4
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Setting
- clinic
- ward
Presentation
- coronary artery disease
- valvular heart disease
- other
Case complexity
- low
- medium
- high
Medical Expert
- Part A: ME 2.2 Elicit a history pertinent to the clinical presentation, without omitting key features
- Part A: ME 2.2 Perform and interpret findings of a physical exam relevant to the cardiovascular system
- Part B: ME 1.4 Apply clinical and biomedical sciences to manage core patient presentations in Cardiac Surgery • Pathology and pathophysiology as relevant to cardiovascular diseases and conditions
- Part B: ME 2.2 Develop a differential diagnosis relevant to the patient’s presentation
- Part B: ME 2.2 Select and interpret appropriate investigations and imaging techniques • ECG • Coronary angiography/CT angiogram • Non-invasive testing • Viability – Nuclear, PET, MRI • Echo/Stress Echo • Radiography (CXR) • Pulmonary function tests
- Part B: ME 2.2 Apply patient risk scores to determine perioperative risk
- Part B: ME 3.1 Describe the indications, contraindications, risks, and alternatives for a given procedure or therapy
- Part B: ME 2.4 Integrate clinical assessment, results of investigations and risk assessment to recommend a medical and/or surgical management plan for common problems in Cardiac Surgery
- Part B: ME 2.4 Develop a plan for cardiac surgery, including, as appropriate, strategies for myocardial protection, coronary revascularization and conduit selection
- Part B: ME 2.4 Develop and implement plans for perioperative optimization of the patient who is a candidate for cardiac surgery
- Part B: ME 3.3 Consider urgency and potential for deterioration, in advocating for the timely execution of a procedure or therapy
Communicator
- Part A: COM 1.2 Optimize the physical environment for patient comfort, privacy, engagement, and safety
- Part A: COM 2.2 Conduct a focused and efficient patient interview, managing the flow of the encounter while being attentive to the patient’s cues and responses
- Part B: COM 5.1 Document clinical encounters to adequately convey clinical reasoning and the rationale for decisions
Collaborator
- Part B: COL 1.3 Integrate the patient’s perspective and context into the collaborative care plan
- Part B: COL 1.1 Receive and appropriately respond to input from other health care professionals
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-2
Assessing patients with acute coronary syndrome and providing initial management
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the clinical assessment of the patient with acute coronary syndrome. - This includes the initial stages in the assessment including differential diagnosis, acute resuscitation, initial medical management, indications for coronary revascularization and timely consultation with other physicians/services to provide definitive management (i.e. diagnose ACS, administer medication, identify indications and need for cardiac catheterization).
Indirect observation by supervisor (cardiology fellow or senior subspecialty resident, cardiology staff, or cardiac surgeon) Use form 1. Form collects information on: - Case complexity: low; medium; high - Complications of MI: arrhythmia; heart failure; shock; other Collect 4 observations of achievement - At least 2 patients with medium or high complexity - At least 1 patient with a complication - At least 2 different assessors
Suggested observations: 4
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Case complexity
- low
- medium
- high
Complications of MI
- arrhythmia
- heart failure
- shock
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Apply clinical and biomedical sciences to manage core patient presentations in Cardiac surgery • Anatomy and physiology of the cardiovascular system • Pathology and pathophysiology as relevant to cardiovascular diseases and conditions • Pharmacology of medications used for coronary insufficiency, anticoagulation, arrhythmia management and inotropic support
- ME 1.4 Apply knowledge of the principles of diagnosis, natural history, and medical management of common cardiac presentations
- ME 1.5 Recognize urgent problems that may need the involvement of more experienced colleagues and seek their assistance
- ME 2.1 Identify medical emergencies and prioritize response
- ME 2.2 Develop a differential diagnosis relevant to the patient’s presentation
- ME 2.2 Select and interpret appropriate investigations and imaging techniques
- ME 2.4 Develop and implement initial management plans
- ME 4.1 Identify patients that would benefit from coronary revascularization and consult with senior colleagues for timely referral
Communicator
- COM 5.1 Document clinical encounters to adequately convey clinical reasoning and the rationale for decisions
Collaborator
- COL 3.1 Identify patients requiring handover to another physician or health care setting
- COL 3.2 Communicate with the receiving physicians or health care professionals during transitions in care, clarifying issues after transfer as needed
Leader
- L 2.1 Consider costs when choosing care options
Professional
- P 2.2 Demonstrate a commitment to patient safety and quality improvement through adherence to institutional policies and procedures
- P 4.1 Maintain capacity for professional clinical performance in stressful situations
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-3
Assessing patients with heart failure, and adjusting diuretics and other medications to optimize patient care
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on clinical assessment and the use of various pharmacologic treatments to manage patients with chronic heart failure - This EPA may be observed in the outpatient or inpatient setting
Indirect observation by supervisor (cardiac surgeon, cardiologist, cardiac subspecialty resident, nurse practitioner in heart failure clinic) Use form 1. Form collects information on - Service: cardiology; cardiac surgery Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 1 cardiology patient - At least 1 surgical patient
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Service
- cardiology
- cardiac surgery
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Apply knowledge of the principles of diagnosis, natural history, and medical management of common cardiac presentations
- ME 1.5 Perform focused clinical assessments
- ME 2.2 Select and interpret appropriate investigations and imaging techniques
- ME 2.4 Develop medical management plans including but not limited to medication, dietary, and lifestyle modifications as appropriate
- ME 4.1 Ensure follow-up on results of investigation and response to treatment
Communicator
- COM 3.1 Use strategies to verify and validate the understanding of the patient and family with regard to the diagnosis, prognosis, and management plan
- COM 5.1 Document clinical encounters to adequately convey clinical reasoning and the rationale for decisions
Health Advocate
- HA 1.3 Apply appropriate secondary prevention strategies for cardiac vascular diseases, according to current guidelines
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-4
Assessing patients with vascular disease, interpreting the results of vascular investigations and proposing…
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on clinical assessment, including a complete physical examination of the peripheral vascular system, synthesis of all clinical data and plan for initial medical or surgical management
Indirect observation (case discussion, review of investigations) by supervisor Use form 1. Form collects information on - Presentation: acute limb ischemia; chronic limb ischemia; internal carotid artery stenosis Collect at least 3 observations of achievement - At least 1 patient with acute limb ischemia - At least 1 patient with chronic limb ischemia - At least 1 patient with internal carotid artery stenosis
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Presentation
- acute limb ischemia
- chronic limb ischemia
- internal carotid artery stenosis
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Apply clinical and biomedical sciences to manage core patient presentations in Cardiac Surgery • Anatomy and physiology of the cardiovascular system • Pathology and pathophysiology as relevant to cardiovascular diseases and conditions
- ME 2.2 Elicit a history pertinent to the clinical presentation, without omitting key features
- ME 2.2 Perform and interpret findings of a physical exam relevant to the cardiovascular system
- ME 2.2 Interpret the results of diagnostic tests
- ME 2.4 Develop and implement initial management plans
- ME 3.3 Consider urgency and potential for deterioration, in advocating for the timely execution of a procedure or therapy
Communicator
- COM 2.3 Seek and synthesize relevant information from other sources, including the patient’s family, with the patient’s consent
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Integrate the patient’s perspective and context into the collaborative care plan
Health Advocate
- HA 1.3 Apply appropriate secondary prevention strategies for cardiac vascular diseases, according to current guidelines
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-5
Applying cardiac echocardiography skills to assess patients with cardiac disease
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the performance of bedside echocardiography to guide assessment and immediate management - This EPA includes the technical skills of bedside echocardiography as well as interpretation of those results
Obtain level 1 focused limited Thoracic Echocardiography as per CCS/CSE
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 3.4 Adjust echocardiographic instrument settings appropriately to optimize image quality
- ME 3.4 Obtain standard echocardiographic parasternal, apical, and subcostal views
- ME 3.4 Assess left and right ventricular size, ascending aorta diameter, and inferior vena cava size by echocardiogram
- ME 3.4 Evaluate central filling pressures using the inferior vena cava
- ME 2.2 Recognize clinically significant findings in a transthoracic 2D-echocardiogram
- ME 3.4 Perform echocardiographic guidance of pericardiocentesis
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-6
Managing post-operative complications in patients who have undergone cardiac surgery
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA includes complications experienced in the intensive care setting as well as on the acute care ward
Direct or indirect (case review) observation by ICU staff/fellow, cardiac surgeon, senior resident or nurse practitioner Use Form 1. Form collects information on - Type of observation: direct; indirect - Type of issue: shock; coagulopathy; stroke; seizure; renal failure; GI emergency (ischemic/bleed); respiratory failure; supraventricular tachycardia; ventricular arrhythmia - Intra-aortic balloon pump: no; yes - Temporary epicardial pacing: no; yes Collect at least 16 observations of achievement - At least 3 patients with shock not requiring IABP - At least 2 patients with IABP - At least 2 patients with postoperative coagulopathy - At least 1 patient with stroke or seizure - At least 1 patient with renal failure - At least 2 patients with a GI emergency - At least 2 patients with respiratory failure - At least 1 patient with supraventricular tachycardia - At least 1 patient with ventricular arrhythmia - At least 1 direct observation of temporary epicardial pacing
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Type of observation
- direct
- indirect
Type of issue
- shock
- coagulopathy
- stroke
- seizure
- renal failure
- GI emergency (ischemic/bleed)
- respiratory failure
- supraventricular tachycardia
- ventricular arrhythmia
Intra-aortic balloon pump
- no
- yes
Temporary epicardial pacing
- no
- yes
Medical Expert
- ME 1.5 Perform focused clinical assessments
- ME 1.5 Recognize urgent problems that may need the involvement of more experienced colleagues and seek their assistance
- ME 2.2 Develop a differential diagnosis relevant to the patient’s presentation
- ME 2.4 Develop and implement management plans for complications in cardiac surgery patients
- ME 4.1 Identify patients that would benefit from referral to other specialists
- ME 4.1 Coordinate investigation, treatment, and follow-up plans when multiple physicians and healthcare professionals are involved
Communicator
- COM 1.1 Communicate using a patient-centred approach that facilitates patient trust and autonomy and is characterized by empathy, respect, and compassion
- COM 3.1 Use strategies to verify and validate the understanding of the patient and family with regard to the diagnosis, prognosis, and management plan
- COM 4.3 Answer questions from the patient and family about next steps
- COM 5.1 Document clinical encounters to adequately convey clinical reasoning and the rationale for decisions
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Integrate the patient’s perspective and context into the collaborative care plan
- COL 3.1 Identify patients requiring handover to another physician or health care setting
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-7
Providing secondary prevention for cardiac surgery patients including lifestyle modification, pharmacologic…
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on applying medical expertise to work with patients to identify and implement opportunities for disease prevention and/or health promotion. This includes lifestyle modification and proper use of medication - This EPA may be observed in the outpatient or inpatient setting
Indirect observation by supervisor (cardiologist, surgeon, rehab) Use form 1. Form collects information on - Type of issue: mechanical valve; biologic valve; bypass; other Collect 4 observations of achievement - At least 1 of each issue - At least 2 assessors
Suggested observations: 4
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Type of issue
- mechanical valve
- biologic valve
- bypass
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Apply clinical and biomedical sciences to manage core patient presentations in Cardiac Surgery
- ME 1.4 Apply knowledge of the principles of foundational therapeutic modalities relevant to Cardiac Surgery
- ME 1.5 Perform focused clinical assessments
- ME 2.1 Identify factors which place patients at risk for disease recurrence and/or adverse outcomes
- ME 2.4 Develop medical management plans including but not limited to medication, dietary, and lifestyle modifications as appropriate
Communicator
- COM 2.1 Integrate and synthesize information about the patient’s beliefs, values, preferences, context, and expectations with biomedical and psychosocial information
- COM 3.1 Use strategies to verify and validate the understanding of the patient and family with regard to the diagnosis, prognosis, and management plan
- COM 4.1 Explore the perspectives of the patient and others when developing care plans
- COM 4.3 Answer questions from the patient and family about next steps
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Consult other health professionals appropriately with regard to patients’ social, rehabilitative, and nutritional concerns
- COL 3.2 Communicate with the patient’s primary health care professional about the patient’s care
Health Advocate
- HA 1.1 Assess patients for risk factors for cardiovascular disease and advise appropriate interventions
- HA 1.2 Select patient education resources related to Cardiac Surgery
- HA 1.2 Educate the patient and family about information and communication technologies to improve health
- HA 1.3 Work with the patient and family to identify opportunities for disease prevention, health promotion, and health protection
- HA 1.3 Apply appropriate secondary prevention strategies for cardiac vascular diseases, according to current guidelines
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-8
Applying principles of cardiopulmonary bypass in the care of cardiac surgery patients
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA includes applying knowledge of cannulation options and pump and oxygenator function to recognize and trouble shoot problems in patients on CPB such as HITT, cold agglutinins, heparin resistance, air embolus, and thrombosis.
Direct observation by surgeon, fellow, senior resident, perfusionist, or anesthesiologist Form 1 collects information on: - Complication: HITT; heparin resistance; cold agglutinins; air embolus; thrombosis Collect 1 observation of achievement
Suggested observations: 1
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Apply knowledge of the principles of use of Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB) • Use and pathophysiology of CPB • Design and function of components of CPB circuits including alternate types of pumps and oxygenators • Catastrophic complications of CPB • Effects of CPB on inflammatory, coagulation and hematological systems as well as end organ damage
- ME 1.5 Perform focused clinical assessments
- ME 2.2 Develop a differential diagnosis relevant to the patient’s presentation
- ME 2.4 Develop and implement plans to trouble shoot problems and/or complications in patients on cardiopulmonary bypass
- ME 5.2 Use cognitive aids such as procedural checklists, structured communication tools, or care paths, to enhance patient safety
Collaborator
- COL 1.1 Respect established rules of their team
- COL 1.1 Receive and appropriately respond to input from other health care professionals
- COL 1.2 Work effectively with other physicians and health care professionals
Professional
- P 4.1 Maintain capacity for professional clinical performance in stressful situations
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-9
Performing the foundational procedures of Cardiac Surgery
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA includes a variety of foundational procedures including: chest tube (open and pigtail); sternotomy and closure; harvest of conduit (multisegment saphenous vein, radial artery, internal thoracic artery); internal jugular line insertion; femoral artery access and sheath insertion; and single atrial cannulation for CPB.
Direct observation by supervisor Use form 2 (O-score criteria). Form collects information on - Type of procedure: chest tube (open); chest tube (pigtail); sternotomy and closure; multisegment saphenous vein harvest; radial artery harvest; internal thoracic artery harvest; internal jugular line insertion; femoral artery access and sheath insertion; single atrial cannulation for CPB - Ultrasound guided: not applicable; yes; no - Clinical setting: OR; ICU; other Collect 28 observations of achievement - At least 2 chest tubes (open) - At least 2 chest tubes (pigtail) - At least 2 sternotomy and closure - At least 5 multisegment saphenous vein harvest - At least 2 radial artery harvest - At least 5 internal thoracic artery harvest - At least 3 internal jugular line insertion - At least 2 femoral artery access and sheath insertion - At least 5 single atrial cannulation for CPB
Suggested observations: 28
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Type of procedure
- chest tube (open)
- chest tube (pigtail)
- sternotomy and closure
- multisegment saphenous vein harvest
- radial artery harvest
- internal thoracic artery harvest
- internal jugular line insertion
- femoral artery access and sheath insertion
- single atrial cannulation for CPB
Ultrasound guided
- not applicable
- yes
- no
Clinical setting
- OR
- ICU
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.1 Gather/assess required information to reach diagnosis and determine correct procedure required
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
- ME 3.4 3D spatial orientation and able to position instruments/hardware where intended
- ME 3.4 Appropriate complete post procedure plan
- ME 3.4 Obvious planned course of procedure with economy of movement and flow
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-10
Performing peripheral vascular anastomoses
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA is most likely to be observed during a vascular surgery clinical experience
Direct observation by cardiac or vascular surgeon Use form 2 (O-score criteria) Collect 2 observations of achievement
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.1 Gather/assess required information to reach diagnosis and determine correct procedure required
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
- ME 3.4 3D spatial orientation and able to position instruments/hardware where intended
- ME 3.4 Appropriate complete post procedure plan
- ME 3.4 Obvious planned course of procedure with economy of movement and flow
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
F-11
Developing a proposal for a scholarly project
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA includes identifying a question for scholarly inquiry, summarizing the current evidence base related to that issue and proposing a plan to address the question.
Supervisor does assessment based on review of the resident’s submission of a proposal or presentation at divisional/local rounds Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Type of scholarly project: basic science research; clinical science research; quality improvement; educational; other Collect 1 observation of achievement
Suggested observations: 1
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Type of scholarly project
- basic science research
- clinical science research
- quality improvement
- educational
- other
Scholar
- S 4.3 Compare and contrast the roles and responsibilities of members of a research team and describe how they differ from clinical and other practice roles and responsibilities
- S 4.4 Describe and compare the common methodologies used for scholarly inquiry in Cardiac Surgery
- S 4.4 Generate focused questions for scholarly investigation
- S 3.3 Critically evaluate the integrity, reliability, and applicability of health- related research and literature
- S 3.3 Determine the validity and risk of bias in a source of evidence
- S 4.5 Summarize the findings of a literature review
- S 4.4 Select appropriate methods of addressing a given scholarly question
- S 4.2 Identify ethical principles in research
- S 4.3 Secure a supervisor’s commitment for a scholarly project
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
Core
C-1
Providing surgical consultation for patients with common presentations relevant to cardiac surgery
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the integration of clinical assessment and investigations to assess surgical indications, operative risk, and available treatment options and provide recommendations for surgical or non-operative management. - This EPA includes the following clinical conditions: coronary disease, valvular disease (aortic, mitral, tricuspid), aortic disease, pericardial disease, cardiac tumours, cardiogenic shock, uncomplicated atrial septal defects/patent foramen ovale, and arrhythmias requiring pacemaker insertion or surgical ablation. - This EPA includes effective communication with the patient and family in the discussion of consent for a surgical procedure and documentation of the consult for the referring physician. - The observation of this EPA is divided into three parts: clinical assessment; verbal communication with the patient/family; and written communication with the referring physician.
Part A: Clinical assessment Indirect observation (case review) by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Location: outpatient; inpatient - Condition: coronary disease; aortic valve disease; mitral valve disease; tricuspid valve disease; aortic disease; pericardial disease; atrial myxoma; uncomplicated atrial septal defects/patent foramen ovale; arrhythmias requiring pacemaker insertion or surgical ablation; left ventricular outflow obstruction; acute pulmonary embolus - Case complexity: low; medium; high Collect at least 16 observations of achievement - At least 4 outpatient - At least 2 each of coronary disease; aortic valve disease; mitral valve disease; tricuspid valve disease; arrhythmias requiring pacemaker insertion or surgical ablation - At least 1 each of aortic disease; pericardial disease; atrial myxoma; uncomplicated atrial septal defects/patent foramen ovale; left ventricular outflow obstruction; acute pulmonary embolus Part B: Discussion for consent Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Case complexity: low; high Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least one high complexity Part C: Written communication Supervisor review of consult letter or note; may be for inpatient or outpatient consult Use Form 1 Collect 3 observations of achievement
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Location
- outpatient
- inpatient
Condition
- coronary disease
- aortic valve disease
- mitral valve disease
- tricuspid valve disease
- aortic disease
- pericardial disease
- atrial myxoma
- uncomplicated atrial septal defects/patent foramen ovale
- arrhythmias requiring pacemaker insertion or surgical ablation
- left ventricular outflow obstruction
- acute pulmonary embolus
Case complexity
- low
- medium
- high
Medical Expert
- Part A: ME 1.5 Perform clinical assessments that address the breadth of issues in each case
- Part A: ME 2.2 Select and interpret appropriate investigations
- Part A: ME 2.2 Synthesize patient information to assess indications and risk of surgery
- Part A: ME 2.3 Address the impact of the medical condition on the patient’s ability to pursue life goals and purposes
- Part A: ME 2.3 Share concerns, in a constructive and respectful manner, about goals of care when they are not felt to be achievable
- Part A: ME 3.1 Integrate all sources of information to develop a procedural or therapeutic plan that is safe, patient-centred, and considers the risks and benefits of all approaches including, as appropriate, surgical or other therapeutic procedures and myocardial protection
- Part A: ME 3.3 Triage a procedure or therapy, taking into account clinical urgency, potential for deterioration, and available resources
- Part A: ME 4.1 Determine the necessity and appropriate timing of referral to other health care professionals
- Part B: ME 1.4 Apply knowledge of the indications, techniques, and complications for surgical procedures
- Part B: ME 3.2 Explain the risks and benefits of, and the rationale for a proposed procedure
- Part B: ME 2.3 Share concerns, in a constructive and respectful manner, about goals of care when they are not felt to be achievable
Communicator
- Part A: COM 2.1 Integrate the biopsychosocial information obtained from a patient- centred interview
- Part A: COM 3.1 Convey information related to the patient’s health status, care, and needs in a timely, honest, and transparent manner
- Part B: COM 3.1 Provide information on diagnosis, prognosis, and plan of care in a clear and compassionate manner
- Part B: COM 4.3 Use effective communication skills and strategies, such as body posture, language at the appropriate level, and periodic checks for understanding
- Part B: COM 2.1 Actively listen and respond to patient cues
- Part B: COM 4.3 Answer questions from the patient and family
- Part B: COM 5.1 Document the consent discussion in an accurate and complete manner
- Part C: COM 5.1 Organize information in appropriate sections
- Part C: COM 5.1 Document all relevant findings and investigations
- Part C: COM 5.1 Convey clinical reasoning and the rationale for decisions
- Part C: COM 5.1 Document the plan for ongoing management
- Part C: COM 5.1 Complete clinical documentation in a timely manner
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-2
Assessing patients with congenital heart disease, interpreting cardiac investigations in settings of disord…
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on clinical assessment, integration of investigation in the complex context of disordered anatomy and physiology, and development of a surgical plan - This EPA may be observed at the bedside, in clinic, or at a case conference
Indirect observation by cardiac surgeon, peds cardiologist or peds intensivist (case discussion and review of imaging/documentation) Use form 1. Form collects information on - Age: neonate; child; adult - Diagnosis: ductal dependent circulation; single ventricle physiology; intra-cardiac shunt (cyanotic/non-cyanotic); coronary anomalies; pediatric/adult coarctation and/or arch coarctation and/or arch anomalies Collect 6 observations of achievement - At least 1 from each age category - At least 1 from each diagnosis
Suggested observations: 6
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Age
- neonate
- child
- adult
Diagnosis
- ductal dependent circulation
- single ventricle physiology
- intra-cardiac shunt (cyanotic/non-cyanotic)
- coronary anomalies
- pediatric/adult coarctation and/or arch coarctation and/or arch anomalies
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Apply knowledge of the principles of diagnosis, natural history, and medical and surgical management of cardiac presentations • Congenital cardiac defects
- ME 1.4 Apply knowledge of the indications, techniques, and complications for core surgical procedures • Repair of simple and complex congenital cardiac defects
- ME 1.5 Perform clinical assessments that address the breadth of issues
- ME 2.2 Select and interpret appropriate investigations
- ME 2.2 Synthesize patient information to determine diagnosis
- ME 2.4 Recommend an appropriate surgical, medical, or percutaneous approach, or appropriate combination of approaches
Communicator
- COM 1.6 Tailor approaches to decision-making to patient (or family) capacity, values, and preferences
- COM 3.1 Provide information on diagnosis, prognosis, and plan of care in a clear and compassionate manner
- COM 4.3 Answer questions from the patient and family
Health Advocate
- HA 1.1 Facilitate timely patient access to services and resources
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-3
Assessing patients with heart failure and making recommendations about candidacy for mechanical device supp…
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on clinical assessment, integration of investigations, identification of patients who are suitable candidates for mechanical device support and/or cardiac transplantation and, where appropriate, device selection and determination of surgical approach - This EPA does not include the performance of the surgical procedure; these are advanced skills
Indirect observation by supervisor (cardiac surgeon or heart failure cardiologist) Use Form 1. Form collects information on - Treatment recommendation: IABP; ECMO; VAD; transplant Collect 4 observations of achievement - At least 1 of each treatment recommendation
Suggested observations: 4
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Treatment recommendation
- IABP
- ECMO
- VAD
- transplant
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Apply a broad base and depth of knowledge in clinical and biomedical sciences to manage the breadth of patient presentations in Cardiac Surgery • Immunology of rejection • Pharmacology of immunosuppression
- ME 1.4 Apply knowledge of the principles of diagnosis, natural history, and medical and surgical management of cardiac presentations • Heart failure, including end-stage heart failure
- ME 1.4 Apply knowledge of the indications, techniques, and complications for core surgical procedures • Mechanical circulatory support, including IABP, ECMO, VAD • Surgical therapy for heart failure including valve surgery, ventricular reconstruction, VAD insertion and transplantation
- ME 1.4 Apply knowledge of Intermacs classification (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support)
- ME 1.4 Apply knowledge of the Canadian Cardiac Transplant Network: Eligibility and listing criteria in Canada
- ME 2.2 Select and interpret appropriate investigations
- ME 2.2 Elicit a history, perform a physical exam, select appropriate investigations, and interpret their results
- ME 2.3 Address the impact of the medical condition on the patient’s ability to pursue life goals and purposes
- ME 3.1 Integrate all sources of information to develop a procedural or therapeutic plan that is safe, patient-centred, and considers the risks and benefits of all approaches
- ME 3.1 Select appropriate procedure and/or device for heart failure patients
Communicator
- COM 2.3 Seek and synthesize relevant information from other sources, including the patient’s family, with the patient’s consent
- COM 3.1 Provide information on diagnosis, prognosis, and plan of care in a clear and compassionate manner
- COM 5.1 Document clinical encounters to adequately convey clinical reasoning and the rationale for decisions
Leader
- L 2.1 Allocate limited resources among individual patients considering utility and efficacy
Health Advocate
- HA 2.3 Distinguish between potentially competing health interests of the individuals, communities, and populations that they serve
Scholar
- S 3.4 Incorporate evidence and guideline recommendations into clinical decision making
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-4
Assessing patients with acute mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction, including mitral val…
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on urgent clinical assessment, integration of investigations and generation of a plan for management which may include a surgical approach - This EPA does not include the performance of the surgical procedure; these are advanced skills
Indirect observation by supervisor (i.e. case review) Use form 1. Form collects information on - Type of issue: papillary muscle rupture; ventricular septal defect; other Collect 1 observation of achievement
Suggested observations: 1
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Type of issue
- papillary muscle rupture
- ventricular septal defect
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Apply knowledge of the principles of diagnosis, natural history, and medical and surgical management of cardiac presentations
- ME 1.5 Perform clinical assessments that address the breadth of issues
- ME 2.2 Select and interpret appropriate investigations
- ME 2.2 Synthesize patient information to determine diagnosis
- ME 2.4 Develop and implement management plans that consider all of the patient’s health problems and context in collaboration with the interprofessional team
- ME 2.4 Recommend an appropriate surgical approach, as relevant
- ME 3.3 Triage a procedure or therapy, taking into account clinical urgency, potential for deterioration, and available resources
Collaborator
- COL 1.2 Consult as needed with other health care professionals, including other physicians
- COL 3.1 Identify patients requiring handover to other physicians or health care professionals
- COL 3.2 Organize the handover of care to the most appropriate physician or health care professional
Professional
- P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviours
- P 4.1 Maintain capacity for professional clinical performance in stressful situations
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-5
Directing the resuscitation of cardiac surgery patients in the critical care setting
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the rapid clinical assessment, concomitant resuscitation and definitive management of patients with serious or life-threatening complications in the immediate post-operative period as well as leadership of the team providing resuscitative care - This EPA includes any of the following clinical presentations: bleeding (including emergent reopening of the sternum); low cardiac output requiring inotropic support; arrhythmia management
Direct or indirect observation by cardiac surgeon, ICU staff or anesthesiologist Use form 1. Form collects information on - Chest reopening: yes; no Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 1 reopening
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Chest reopening
- yes
- no
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Apply knowledge of the principles of diagnosis, natural history, and medical and surgical management of cardiac presentations
- ME 1.4 Apply knowledge of the principles of therapeutic modalities relevant to Cardiac Surgery • Intensive care management of adult patients including but not limited to ventilator management, inotropes, treatment of arrhythmias, and the manipulation of the pulmonary and systemic circulations
- ME 2.1 Identify patients in need of resuscitation and initiate appropriate measures
- ME 2.1 Concurrently diagnose and manage life threatening emergencies
- ME 2.1 Adapt management plans as the clinical situation evolves
- ME 2.2 Focus the clinical encounter, performing it in a time-effective manner, without excluding key elements
- ME 2.4 Monitor clinical response, identifying the appropriateness of continuing, modifying, or discontinuing treatment
- ME 4.1 Determine the necessity and appropriate timing of referral to other healthcare professionals
Collaborator
- COL 1.1 Apply a team approach to patient care
- COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with physicians and other health care professionals
Leader
- L 4.2 Assume a leadership role in the management of complex cases
Professional
- P 4.1 Maintain capacity for professional clinical performance in stressful situations
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-6
Managing sternal wound complications in patients who have undergone cardiac surgery
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA includes clinical assessment, integration of investigations, generation of a management plan, which may include a surgical strategy, and postoperative care - This EPA may include any sternal wound complication: infections, dehiscence, mediastinitis - The observation of this EPA is divided into two parts: clinical assessment with medical treatment; surgical treatment of deep infection (debridement, preparation for flap, complete rewiring)
Part A: Assessment and medical treatment Indirect observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on - Type of complication: superficial infection; deep infection; dehiscence; other Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 1 patient with superficial infection - At least 1 patient with deep infection - At least 1 patient with dehiscence Part B: Surgical treatment Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 2 (O-score criteria). Form collects information on: - Type of complication: superficial infection; deep infection; dehiscence; other - Procedure: debridement, prep for flap; complete rewiring; other Collect 1 observation of achievement - Must include a deep infection that requires debridement, prep for flap, and complete rewiring
Suggested observations: 3
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Type of complication
- superficial infection
- deep infection
- dehiscence
- other
Medical Expert
- Part A: ME 1.5 Perform clinical assessments that address the breadth of issues
- Part A: ME 1.7 Seek assistance in situations that are complex or new
- Part A: ME 2.2 Select and interpret appropriate investigations
- Part A: ME 2.2 Synthesize patient information to assess indications and risk of surgery
- Part A: ME 2.4 Recognize and treat wound complications including but not limited to infections, dehiscence, and mediastinitis
- Part A: ME 3.1 Integrate all sources of information to develop a procedural or therapeutic plan that is safe, patient-centred, and considers the risks and benefits of all approaches
- Part A: ME 3.3 Triage a procedure or therapy, taking into account clinical urgency, potential for deterioration, and available resources
- Part A: ME 3.4 Document procedures accurately
- Part B: ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- Part B: ME 3.1 Gather/assess required information to reach diagnosis and determine correct procedure required
- Part B: ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- Part B: ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
- Part B: ME 3.4 3D spatial orientation and able to position instruments/hardware where intended
- Part B: ME 3.4 Appropriate complete post procedure plan
- Part B: ME 3.4 Obvious planned course of procedure with economy of movement and flow
Communicator
- Part A: COM 3.1 Convey information related to the patient’s health status, care, and needs in a timely, honest, and transparent manner
- Part A: COM 3.2 Communicate the reasons for unanticipated clinical outcomes to patients and disclose patient safety incidents
- Part A: COM 5.1 Adapt record keeping to the specific guidelines of their discipline and the clinical context
Collaborator
- Part A: COL 1.2 Consult as needed with other health care professionals, including other physicians
- Part A: COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with physicians and other health care professionals
- Part B: COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-7
Providing ongoing care in the cardiac surgery clinic, for patients with common presentations relevant to Ca…
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on ongoing management and may include ongoing monitoring of a cardiac condition that has not yet required surgery, or outpatient postoperative management including referral back to primary physician and/or ongoing longitudinal care. - This EPA may be observed in any patient returning for cardiac surgery followup visit
Indirect observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Patient issue: post-op followup; other - Decision: ongoing followup; operative management; discharge from clinic Collect at least 4 observations of achievement - At least 1 from each type of patient issue - At least 1 from each type of decision
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Patient issue
- post-op followup
- other
Decision
- ongoing followup
- operative management
- discharge from clinic
Medical Expert
- ME 1.1 Demonstrate commitment and accountability for patients in their care
- ME 1.4 Apply a broad base and depth of knowledge in clinical and biomedical sciences to manage the breadth of patient presentations in Cardiac Surgery
- ME 1.5 Perform clinical assessments that address the breadth of issues in each case
- ME 2.2 Select and interpret appropriate investigations
- ME 4.1 Establish plans for ongoing care
- ME 4.1 Determine the necessity and appropriate timing of referral to other health care professionals
Communicator
- COM 3.1 Convey information related to the patient’s health status, care, and needs in a timely, honest, and transparent manner
- COM 4.3 Answer questions from the patient and family
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with physicians and other health care professionals
- COL 3.1 Determine if/when care should be transferred back to the referring/primary care physician
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-8
Leading the team caring for patients on the cardiac surgery service, including the administrative aspects o…
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on medical expertise and leadership applied to the coordination of care for a group of patients, in collaboration with the interprofessional team
Multiple observers provide feedback individually, which is then collated to one report Use Form 3. Form collects information on: - Role of observer: attending staff; nurse; clinical assistant; other health professional; other trainee (e.g. fellow; resident; medical student) Collect feedback on 2 occasions, one each at junior core and senior core. Each occasion should include - At least 6 observers - At least 1 attending staff - At least 2 other observer roles
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Role of observer
- attending staff
- nurse
- clinical assistant
- other health professional
- other trainee (e.g. fellow
- resident
- medical student)
Medical Expert
- ME 1.1 Demonstrate responsibility and accountability for decisions regarding patient care
- ME 1.6 Carry out professional duties in the face of multiple, competing demands
- ME 1.6 Prioritize patients on the basis of clinical presentations
- ME 2.4 Develop and implement management plans
Collaborator
- COL 1.2 Delegate responsibilities to members of the health care team appropriate to their scope of practice and level of expertise
- COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with physicians and other health care professionals
Leader
- L 2.1 Allocate health care resources for optimal patient care
- L 4.1 Integrate supervisory and teaching responsibilities into the overall management of the clinical service
- L 4.2 Run the service efficiently, safely, and effectively
Health Advocate
- HA 1.1 Facilitate timely patient access to services and resources
Scholar
- S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise into decision-making
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-9
Supervising junior learners in a variety of clinical settings (ward, clinic, OR)
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA may be observed in the ward, operating room, or outpatient setting
Part A: Supervisor observation Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Location: OR; clinic; ward; consult; simulation Collect 5 observations of achievement - At least 2 different locations Part B: Learner feedback Competence Committee reviews collated learner feedback Use Form 3. Form collects information on: - Level of learner: medical student; junior resident Collect feedback from at least 6 learners - At least 1 medical student - At least 1 junior resident
Suggested observations: 5
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Location
- OR
- clinic
- ward
- consult
- simulation
Collaborator
- Part B: COL 2.1 Delegate tasks and responsibilities in an appropriate and respectful manner
Scholar
- Part A: S 2.2 Ensure a safe learning environment for all members of the team
- Part A: S 2.3 Supervise learners to ensure they work within their limitations
- Part A: S 2.4 Provide clinical teaching and/or other informal learning activities
- Part A: S 2.5 Provide feedback to enhance learning and performance
- Part B: S 2.2 Create a positive learning environment
- Part B: S 2.3 Provide opportunities for appropriate clinical responsibility
- Part B: S 2.3 Is available and accessible to junior learners
- Part B: S 2.5 Provide feedback to enhance learning and performance
- Part B: S 2.1 Is a positive role model
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-10
Preparing patients for the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA integrates individual tasks entrusted at the Foundations stage, and includes sternotomy, central cannulation, institution of CPB and/or harvest of a conduit vessel as appropriate. - This EPA should be achieved at an early level of the Core stage.
Direct observation by supervisor Use form 2. Form collects information on: - Cannulation site (check all that apply): atrial; bicaval; axillary; femoral; ascending aorta; arch; other - Cardioplegia: retrograde; other - Type of surgery (check all that apply): coronary artery bypass surgery; aortic valve; mitral valve; tricuspid valve; cannulation for arch surgery; other ascending aorta surgery Collect 8 observations of achievement - A variety of cannulation sites - At least 3 retrograde cardioplegia - At least 2 coronary artery bypass surgery - At least 2 aortic valve replacement - At least 1 mitral valve surgery - At least 1 tricuspid valve surgery - At least 1 ascending aorta surgery - At least 1 cannulation for arch surgery
Suggested observations: 8
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Cannulation site (check all that apply)
- atrial
- bicaval
- axillary
- femoral
- ascending aorta
- arch
- other
Cardioplegia
- retrograde
- other
Type of surgery (check all that apply)
- coronary artery bypass surgery
- aortic valve
- mitral valve
- tricuspid valve
- cannulation for arch surgery
- other ascending aorta surgery
Medical Expert
- ME 1.3 Consolidate the competencies of Surgical Foundations
- ME 1.4 Apply a broad base and depth of knowledge in clinical and biomedical sciences to manage the breadth of patient presentations in Cardiac Surgery
- ME 1.4 Apply knowledge of the principles of use of Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB) • Use and pathophysiology of CPB • Design and function of components of CPB circuits including alternate types of pumps and oxygenators • Catastrophic complications of CPB • Effects of CPB on inflammatory, coagulation and hematological systems as well as end organ damage
- ME 3.1 Review, and revise as appropriate, the plan for surgical approach, conduit vessel and/or myocardial protection
- ME 3.4 Demonstrate effective procedure preparation, including the use of a pre-procedure time-out or safety checklist as appropriate
- ME 3.4 Perform common procedures in a skilful, fluid, and safe manner with minimal assistance • Sternotomy • Institution of CPB using a variety of cannulation techniques and devices • Appropriate conduct of CPB
- ME 5.2 Apply the principles of situational awareness to clinical practice
- ME 3.4 Recognize CPB related complications at initiation
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Convey plan for surgical approach to the operating team
- COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with physicians and other health care professionals
Leader
- L 4.2 Apply leadership skills to enhance patient care in the operating room
Professional
- P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviours
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-11
Performing axillary cannulation
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the resident having a sound plan and performing all aspects of the procedure - This EPA may be observed in any surgical case or condition
Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 2 (O-score criteria). Collect 1 observation of achievement
Suggested observations: 1
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.1 Gather/assess required information to reach diagnosis and determine correct procedure required
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
- ME 3.4 3D spatial orientation and able to position instruments/hardware where intended
- ME 3.4 Appropriate complete post procedure plan
- ME 3.4 Obvious planned course of procedure with economy of movement and flow
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-12
Performing a thoracotomy
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the resident having a sound plan and performing all aspects of the procedure - This EPA may be observed in any surgical case or condition
Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 2 (O-score criteria). Collect 2 observation of achievement
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.1 Gather/assess required information to reach diagnosis and determine correct procedure required
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
- ME 3.4 3D spatial orientation and able to position instruments/hardware where intended
- ME 3.4 Appropriate complete post procedure plan
- ME 3.4 Obvious planned course of procedure with economy of movement and flow
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-13
Performing the insertion of an intra-aortic balloon pump
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the resident having a sound plan and performing all aspects of the procedure. - This EPA may be observed in any surgical case or condition.
Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 2 (O-score criteria). Collect 1 observation of achievement
Suggested observations: 1
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.1 Gather/assess required information to reach diagnosis and determine correct procedure required
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
- ME 3.4 3D spatial orientation and able to position instruments/hardware where intended
- ME 3.4 Appropriate complete post procedure plan
- ME 3.4 Obvious planned course of procedure with economy of movement and flow
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-14
Performing surgical procedures for patients with coronary artery disease
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the resident having a sound plan and performing all aspects of the procedure with an experienced assistant and minor prompting - This EPA includes coronary artery bypass grafting using a range of arterial and venous conduits - This EPA may be observed in a surgical case that also includes a second cardiac surgery procedure (e.g. valve surgery)
Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 2 (O-score). Form collects information on - LITA: yes; no - Total number of grafts: 1; 2; 3; 4; other Collect 6 observations - Case complexity must be LITA plus at least 2 other grafts - At least 2 assessors
Suggested observations: 6
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
LITA
- yes
- no
Total number of grafts
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- other
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.1 Gather/assess required information to reach diagnosis and determine correct procedure required
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
- ME 3.4 3D spatial orientation and able to position instruments/hardware where intended
- ME 3.4 Appropriate complete post procedure plan
- ME 3.4 Obvious planned course of procedure with economy of movement and flow
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-15
Performing surgical procedures for patients with aortic valve disease
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the resident having a sound plan and performing all aspects of the procedure with an experienced assistant and minor prompting - This EPA may be observed in a surgical case that also includes a second cardiac surgery procedure (e.g. CABG)
Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 2 (O-score). Collect 3 observations of achievement - At least 2 assessors
Suggested observations: 3
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.1 Gather/assess required information to reach diagnosis and determine correct procedure required
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
- ME 3.4 3D spatial orientation and able to position instruments/hardware where intended
- ME 3.4 Appropriate complete post procedure plan
- ME 3.4 Obvious planned course of procedure with economy of movement and flow
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-16
Performing surgical procedures for patients with mitral valve disease
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the resident having a sound plan and performing all aspects of the procedure with an experienced assistant and minor prompting - This EPA may be observed in a surgical case that also includes a second cardiac surgery procedure (e.g. CABG)
Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 2 (O-score). Form collects information on - Type of procedure: simple mitral valve replacement; mitral annulopasty Collect 4 observations of achievement - At least 2 mitral valve replacement - At least 2 mitral annuloplasty - At least 2 assessors
Suggested observations: 4
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Type of procedure
- simple mitral valve replacement
- mitral annulopasty
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.1 Gather/assess required information to reach diagnosis and determine correct procedure required
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
- ME 3.4 3D spatial orientation and able to position instruments/hardware where intended
- ME 3.4 Appropriate complete post procedure plan
- ME 3.4 Obvious planned course of procedure with economy of movement and flow
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-17
Performing surgical procedures for patients with tricuspid valve disease
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the resident having a sound plan and performing all aspects of a tricuspid valve repair/replacement with an experienced assistant and minor prompting - This EPA may be observed in a surgical case that also includes a second cardiac surgery procedure (e.g. CABG)
Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 2 (O-score). Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least 2 assessors
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.1 Gather/assess required information to reach diagnosis and determine correct procedure required
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
- ME 3.4 3D spatial orientation and able to position instruments/hardware where intended
- ME 3.4 Appropriate complete post procedure plan
- ME 3.4 Obvious planned course of procedure with economy of movement and flow
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-18
Performing surgical procedures for patients with arrhythmias
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the resident having a sound plan and performing all aspects of the procedure with an experienced assistant and minor prompting - This EPA includes the surgical technique as well as interrogation of the pacemaker as appropriate to the case
Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 2 (O-score). Form collects information on: - Procedure: implantation of transvenous single chamber pacemaker; implantation of transvenous dual chamber pacemaker; placement of epicardial pacemaker; surgical ablation; battery change Collect at least 7 observations of achievement - At least 2 implantation of transvenous single chamber pacemaker - At least 2 implantation of transvenous dual chamber pacemaker - At least 1 placement of epicardial pacemaker - At least 1 surgical ablation - At least 1 battery change
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Procedure
- implantation of transvenous single chamber pacemaker
- implantation of transvenous dual chamber pacemaker
- placement of epicardial pacemaker
- surgical ablation
- battery change
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.1 Gather/assess required information to reach diagnosis and determine correct procedure required
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
- ME 3.4 3D spatial orientation and able to position instruments/hardware where intended
- ME 3.4 Appropriate complete post procedure plan
- ME 3.4 Obvious planned course of procedure with economy of movement and flow
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-19
Performing surgical procedures for patients with conditions affecting the ascending aorta
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the resident having a sound plan and performing all aspects of the replacement of an ascending aorta with an experienced assistant and minor prompting
Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 2 (O-score). Collect 2 observations of achievement
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.1 Gather/assess required information to reach diagnosis and determine correct procedure required
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
- ME 3.4 3D spatial orientation and able to position instruments/hardware where intended
- ME 3.4 Appropriate complete post procedure plan
- ME 3.4 Obvious planned course of procedure with economy of movement and flow
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-20
Performing aortic anastomoses
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA may be observed in any operation requiring aortic anastomosis regardless of condition (i.e. any segment of aorta, aneurysm, dissection, prosthetic)
Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 2 (O-score criteria). Collect 5 observations of achievement - At least two assessors
Suggested observations: 5
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.1 Gather/assess required information to reach diagnosis and determine correct procedure required
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
- ME 3.4 3D spatial orientation and able to position instruments/hardware where intended
- ME 3.4 Appropriate complete post procedure plan
- ME 3.4 Obvious planned course of procedure with economy of movement and flow
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-21
Performing surgical procedures for patients with simple congenital heart defects
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the resident having a sound plan and performing all aspects of the procedure with an experienced assistant and minor prompting - This EPA includes the repair of an atrial septal defect OR a patent foramen ovale
Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 2 (O-score). Form collects information on - Type of surgery: ASD repair; PFO repair Collect 1 observation of achievement
Suggested observations: 1
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Type of surgery
- ASD repair
- PFO repair
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.1 Gather/assess required information to reach diagnosis and determine correct procedure required
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
- ME 3.4 3D spatial orientation and able to position instruments/hardware where intended
- ME 3.4 Appropriate complete post procedure plan
- ME 3.4 Obvious planned course of procedure with economy of movement and flow
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-22
Performing surgical procedures for patients with an atrial myxoma
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the resident having a sound plan and performing all aspects of the procedure with an experienced assistant and minor prompting
Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 2 (O-score). Collect 1 observation of achievement
Suggested observations: 1
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.1 Gather/assess required information to reach diagnosis and determine correct procedure required
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
- ME 3.4 3D spatial orientation and able to position instruments/hardware where intended
- ME 3.4 Appropriate complete post procedure plan
- ME 3.4 Obvious planned course of procedure with economy of movement and flow
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-23
Performing surgical procedures for patients with pericardial disease
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the resident having a sound plan and performing all aspects of the procedure with an experienced assistant and minor prompting - This EPA includes performing a pericardial window
Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 2 (O-score). Form collects information on: - Type of procedure: pericardial window; pericardiectomy Collect 1 observation of achievement
Suggested observations: 1
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Type of procedure
- pericardial window
- pericardiectomy
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.1 Gather/assess required information to reach diagnosis and determine correct procedure required
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
- ME 3.4 3D spatial orientation and able to position instruments/hardware where intended
- ME 3.4 Appropriate complete post procedure plan
- ME 3.4 Obvious planned course of procedure with economy of movement and flow
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-24
Performing surgical procedures for patients requiring redo sternotomy
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the resident having a sound plan and performing all aspects of the procedure with an experienced assistant and minor prompting - This EPA includes a simple redo sternotomy and take down of adhesions
Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 2 (O-score). Collect 1 observation of achievement
Suggested observations: 1
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.1 Gather/assess required information to reach diagnosis and determine correct procedure required
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
- ME 3.4 3D spatial orientation and able to position instruments/hardware where intended
- ME 3.4 Appropriate complete post procedure plan
- ME 3.4 Obvious planned course of procedure with economy of movement and flow
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-25
Performing peripheral arterial embolectomy
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the resident having a sound plan and performing all aspects of the procedure
Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 2 (O-score criteria). Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least two assessors
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.1 Gather/assess required information to reach diagnosis and determine correct procedure required
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
- ME 3.4 3D spatial orientation and able to position instruments/hardware where intended
- ME 3.4 Appropriate complete post procedure plan
- ME 3.4 Obvious planned course of procedure with economy of movement and flow
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-26
Participating as first assistant in a transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the surgical approach to a TAVI, with the resident in the role of first assistant
Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 2 (O-score). Collect 1 observation of achievement
Suggested observations: 1
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.1 Gather/assess required information to reach diagnosis and determine correct procedure required
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
- ME 3.4 3D spatial orientation and able to position instruments/hardware where intended
- ME 3.4 Appropriate complete post procedure plan
- ME 3.4 Obvious planned course of procedure with economy of movement and flow
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-27
Performing the minimally invasive skills of cardiac surgery
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA includes performing a small thoracotomy, and appropriate port placement, use of soft tissue retractors and use of thoracoscope
Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 2 (O-score criteria). Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least two assessors
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.1 Gather/assess required information to reach diagnosis and determine correct procedure required
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
- ME 3.4 3D spatial orientation and able to position instruments/hardware where intended
- ME 3.4 Appropriate complete post procedure plan
- ME 3.4 Obvious planned course of procedure with economy of movement and flow
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-28
Instituting extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the resident having a sound plan and performing all aspects of the procedure with an experienced assistant and minor prompting - This EPA may be observed in a patient with any indication for ECMO and using any technique for vascular access.
Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 2 (O-score). Form collects information on - Technique for access: central; peripheral; other - Type of ECMO: venous-venous; arterio-venous Collect 2 observations of achievement - Different techniques - Different types of ECMO
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Technique for access
- central
- peripheral
- other
Type of ECMO
- venous-venous
- arterio-venous
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
- ME 3.4 3D spatial orientation and able to position instruments/hardware where intended
- ME 3.4 Appropriate complete post procedure plan
- ME 3.4 Obvious planned course of procedure with economy of movement and flow
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-29
Navigating/Placing wires in coronary circulation/heart under fluoroscopic guidance
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the application of wire/catheter skills as well as skills in using fluoroscopy/cine - This EPA requires observation during diagnostic coronary angiograms, left ventriculograms, and right heart catheterizations
Direct observation by interventional cardiologist Use form 2 (O-score criteria). Form collects information on - Type of procedure: cannulation of coronary ostium; crossing aortic valve; passing wire up pulmonary artery Collect 5 observations of achievement - At least 2 left heart catheterizations: cannulation of coronary ostium - At least 1 right heart catheterization: passing wire up pulmonary artery - At least 2 left ventriculograms: crossing aortic valve - At least 2 assessors
Suggested observations: 5
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Type of procedure
- cannulation of coronary ostium
- crossing aortic valve
- passing wire up pulmonary artery
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
- ME 3.4 3D spatial orientation and able to position instruments/hardware where intended
- ME 3.4 Appropriate complete post procedure plan
- ME 3.4 Obvious planned course of procedure with economy of movement and flow
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-30
Weaning patients from cardiopulmonary bypass
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA includes the recognition of problems and initiation of appropriate algorithms for simple and difficult weaning - The observation of this EPA must include some cases with high complexity such as patients with heart failure or valve patients requiring IABP, as well as patients with high inotrope or pressor requirements, with prolonged weaning and/or with an open chest
Direct observation by supervisor Use form 1. Form collects information on - Case complexity: low; medium; high Collect 6 observations of achievement - At least 3 cases that are high complexity - At least 2 assessors
Suggested observations: 6
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Case complexity
- low
- medium
- high
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Apply knowledge of the principles of use of Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB) in adults • Use and pathophysiology of CPB • Design and function of components of CPB circuits including alternate types of pumps and oxygenators • Complications of CPB • Effects of CPB on inflammatory, coagulation and hematological systems as well as end organ damage • Use of profound hypothermia and circulatory arrest
- ME 3.4 Initiate algorithms for weaning from CPB
- ME 2.1 Recognize instability and medical acuity
- ME 3.1 Integrate all sources of information to develop a procedural or therapeutic plan that is safe, patient-centred, and considers the risks and benefits of all approaches
- ME 3.4 Adapt weaning protocols to patient status, including but not limited to hemostasis related issues
- ME 1.7 Adapt care as the complexity of the patient’s clinical situation evolves
- ME 4.1 Establish plans for ongoing care
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with physicians and other health care professionals
Professional
- P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviours
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-31
Transitioning the care of patients from the operating room to the ICU
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the anticipation and recognition of potential problems (such as poor RV function, hemodynamic issues, hemostasis, technical concerns) and accurate and effective communication to the receiving physician/team at time of transfer to ICU
Direct observation by cardiac surgeon or ICU staff Use form 1. Form collects information on - Observer role: cardiac surgeon; intensive care physician - Case complexity: low; medium; high Collect 4 observations of achievement - At least 1 by cardiac surgeon - At least 1 intensive care physician - At least 2 high complexity cases
Suggested observations: 4
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Observer role
- cardiac surgeon
- intensive care physician
Case complexity
- low
- medium
- high
Medical Expert
- ME 2.1 Consider clinical urgency, feasibility, availability of resources, and comorbidities in determining priorities to be addressed
- ME 2.4 Develop and implement management plans for weaning sedative, vasoactive, and/or inotropic agents as well as mechanical ventilation
- ME 3.4 Establish and implement a plan for post-procedure care
Collaborator
- COL 3.2 Summarize the patient’s issues in the transfer summary, including plans to deal with ongoing issues
- COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with physicians and other health care professionals
- COL 1.2 Delegate responsibilities to members of the health care team appropriate to their scope of practice and level of expertise
- COL 3.2 Recognize and act on patient safety issues in the transfer of care
Professional
- P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviours
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-32
Integrating Cardiac Surgery scientific literature into clinical practice
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA may be observed in any formal teaching session e.g. journal club, divisional rounds, quality assurance rounds - This EPA includes identifying a clinical question, and performing and appraising a literature search, as well as effective presentation skills
Direct observation by supervisor Form collects information on - Setting: journal club; academic rounds (grand rounds, QA rounds) Collect 6 observations of achievement - At least 3 journal club - At least 3 academic rounds
Suggested observations: 6
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Setting
- journal club
- academic rounds (grand rounds, QA rounds)
Scholar
- S 3.1 Generate focused questions that address practice uncertainty and knowledge gaps
- S 3.2 Identify, select, and navigate pre-appraised resources
- S 3.3 Interpret study findings, including a critique of their relevance to their practice
- S 3.3 Determine the validity and risk of bias in a source of evidence
- S 3.4 Identify new evidence appropriate to their scope of professional practice through quality-appraised evidence-alerting services
- S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise
- S 2.4 Present the information in an organized manner to facilitate understanding
- S 2.4 Use audiovisual aids effectively
Professional
- P 2.1 Demonstrate a commitment to maintaining and enhancing competence
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-33
Executing a scholarly project relevant to Cardiac Surgery
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA includes using appropriate methods, analyzing results, critically reflecting on the findings and disseminating results in some format. It may include obtaining grant funding and preparing a manuscript for publication. - This may include basic or clinical science related to cardiac surgery or cardiovascular science, or medical education research - The achievement of this EPA may be observed via submission of a manuscript suitable for submission to a peer reviewed journal, or presentation of the project at a peer-reviewed local, regional, provincial or national scientific meeting
Supervisor does assessment based on review of resident’s submission of the research project Use Form 1. Collect 1 observation of achievement
Suggested observations: 1
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Leader
- L 4.1 Organize work to manage clinical, scholarly, and other responsibilities
Scholar
- S 4.4 Identify, consult, and collaborate with content experts and others in the conduct of scholarly work
- S 4.4 Generate focused questions for scholarly investigation
- S 3.3 Critically evaluate the integrity, reliability, and applicability of health- related research and literature
- S 4.5 Summarize the findings of a literature review
- S 4.4 Select appropriate methods of addressing a given scholarly question
- S 4.2 Identify ethical principles in research
- S 4.3 Actively participate as a research team member, balancing the roles and responsibilities of a researcher with the clinical roles and responsibilities of a physician
- S 4.4 Collect data for a scholarly project
- S 4.4 Perform data analysis
- S 4.4 Integrate existing literature and findings of data collection
- S 4.4 Identify areas for further investigation
- S 4.5 Summarize and communicate the findings of research and scholarly inquiry
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
C-34
Analyzing a patient safety event for the purposes of quality improvement
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the analysis of the root causes of a patient safety event, and should include the identification potential improvements - This EPA may be observed via presentation of a case at Morbidity and Mortality rounds or another quality improvement venue, or via submission of a report
Direct observation by supervisor Use form 1 Collect one observation of achievement
Suggested observations: 1
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 5.1 Identify patient safety or near miss incidents
- ME 5.1 Identify potential improvement opportunities arising from harmful patient safety incidents and near misses
- ME 5.2 Consider system factors in the analysis of the safety event
Leader
- L 1.3 Analyze harmful patient safety incidents and near misses to enhance systems of care
Scholar
- S 3.3 Evaluate the applicability (external validity or generalizability) of evidence from a resource
Professional
- P 2.2 Demonstrate a commitment to patient safety and quality improvement initiatives within their own practice environment
- P 3.3 Prepare a morbidity and mortality report or chart review
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
Transition to Practice
TTP-1
Assessing patients for initiation of ECMO and providing ongoing ECMO management
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the shared decision-making to initiate ECMO, as well as the surgical expertise to manage the ECMO procedure during ongoing care - This EPA may be observed in patients undergoing ECMO for any clinical indication - The observation of this EPA is divided into two parts: the assessment and decision that a patient is suitable for ECMO, and the ongoing optimization and troubleshooting of the ECMO procedure
Part A: Consult Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Type of ECMO: arterio-venous; venous-venous Collect 2 observations of achievement - At least one arterio-venous Part B: Ongoing management Indirect observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Collect 2 observations of achievement
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Type of ECMO
- arterio-venous
- venous-venous
Medical Expert
- Part A: ME 1.5 Perform appropriately timed clinical assessments
- Part A: ME 2.2 Synthesize and interpret the clinical information
- Part A: ME 3.1 Determine the patient’s eligibility and suitability for ECMO
- Part A: ME 3.3 Determine the appropriate timing and type of ECMO
- Part A: ME 2.3 Provide information to the family about the expectation of benefit and risks of ECMO, and align with the goals of care
- Part A: ME 4.1 Establish a plan for ongoing monitoring and care
- Part B: ME 1.5 Perform appropriately timed clinical assessments
- Part B: ME 3.4 Assess adequacy of perfusion and cannula placement
- Part B: ME 2.4 Manage the course of therapy with ECMO, including access, anticoagulation/ hemostasis and any complications
- Part B: ME 2.4 Determine the timing and procedure for weaning from ECMO
- Part B: ME 2.3 Provide information to the family about the expectation of benefit and risks of ECMO, and align with the goals of care
Collaborator
- Part A: COL 1.3 Engage in respectful shared decision-making with physicians and other health care professionals
- Part B: COL 1.3 Engage in respectful shared decision-making with physicians and other health care professionals
Leader
- Part A: L 2.1 Allocate health care resources for optimal patient care
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
TTP-2
Providing afterhours coverage for a cardiac surgery service, including supervision of junior learners
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on being accessible to junior learners, referring physicians and/or patients, providing appropriate and timely advice about management and/or patient disposition as well as recognizing conditions that can be managed remotely (by telephone) versus those that require in-person assessment - The observation of this EPA should be documented after each call event during the TTPractice year
Direct (three way phone consultation) or indirect (review of call cases) observation by supervisor Form collects information on: - Case acuity: emergent; urgent; routine Collect 6 observations of achievement - At least 2 emergencies - At least 2 assessors
Suggested observations: 6
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Case acuity
- emergent
- urgent
- routine
Medical Expert
- ME 2.2 Interpret clinical information gathered by another health professional, along with the results of investigations, for the purposes of diagnosis and management
- ME 2.4 Establish a patient centered plan for management and/or patient disposition
Collaborator
- COL 3.1 Determine when a patient should be transferred to ensure optimal patient care
- COL 3.2 Provide appropriate advice for immediate management, and in preparation for transfer, as relevant
- COL 1.2 Negotiate overlapping and shared responsibilities with physicians and other colleagues in the health care professions
Leader
- L 2.1 Apply knowledge of the available local health care resources
Scholar
- S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise into decision-making
Professional
- P 1.1 Respond punctually to requests from patients or other health care providers
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
TTP-3
Performing the breadth of core Cardiac Surgery procedures as the primary surgeon
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the role of the resident as primary surgeon for common cardiac surgery procedures, selecting materials, instruments and equipment, directing assistants, initiating and weaning cardiopulmonary bypass, directing the course of the operation and working effectively with the other members of the OR team (anesthesiologist, perfusionists, nurses) - This EPA includes the following procedures: simple CABG; isolated valve replacement/annulopasty; resection of atrial myxoma, ascending aorta surgery; resternotomy (simple and for indications of post-op bleed/tamponade); sternal rewiring
Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 2 (milestone criteria). Form collects information on: - Case complexity: low; medium; high - Procedure: coronary artery bypass graft; aortic valve replacement; mitral valve replacement; mitral annulopasty; resection of atrial myxoma; ascending aorta surgery; simple redo sternotomy; chest re-opening (post-op bleed or tamponade); sternal rewiring Collect at least 25 observations: - At least 5 CABG - At least 5 aortic valve replacement - At least 2 mitral valve replacement - At least 2 mitral annulopasty - At least 1 resection of atrial myxoma - At least 2 ascending aorta surgery - At least 1 simple redo sternotomy - At least 2 chest re-opening (post-op bleed or tamponade) - At least 1 sternal rewiring - At least 3 assessors
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Case complexity
- low
- medium
- high
Procedure
- coronary artery bypass graft
- aortic valve replacement
- mitral valve replacement
- mitral annulopasty
- resection of atrial myxoma
- ascending aorta surgery
- simple redo sternotomy
- chest re-opening (post-op bleed or tamponade)
- sternal rewiring
Medical Expert
- ME 1.1 Demonstrate a commitment to high-quality care of their patients
- ME 3.1 Select appropriate materials and equipment
- ME 3.4 Institute cardiopulmonary bypass
- ME 3.4 Institute appropriate myocardial protection
- ME 3.4 Perform procedures in a skilful and safe manner, adapting to unanticipated findings or changing clinical circumstances
- ME 3.4 Wean cardiopulmonary bypass
- ME 3.4 Adapt weaning protocols to patient status, including but not limited to hemostasis related issues
Collaborator
- COL 2.1 Delegate tasks and responsibilities in an appropriate and respectful manner
Leader
- L 2.1 Allocate health care resources for optimal patient care
- L 4.2 Demonstrate leadership skills in surgical practice
Professional
- P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviours
- P 4.1 Exhibit self-awareness and effectively manage influences on personal well- being and professional performance
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
TTP-4
Performing advanced Cardiac Surgery procedures with an experienced assistant
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on the resident having a sound plan and performing all aspects of the procedure with an experienced assistant and minor prompting - This EPA does not include selection of material or equipment, directing surgical assistance or taking primary responsibility for the flow of the operation and effectiveness of the OR team - This EPA includes the following procedures: aortic dissection; Bentall; emergency CABG; reoperations; simple mitral valve repair; transcatheter valve
Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 2 (O-score criteria). Form collects information on: - Type of procedure: aortic dissection; Bentall; emergency CABG; reoperations; simple mitral valve repair; transcatheter valve Collect 10 observations of achievement - At least 1 aortic dissection - At least 1 Bentall - At least 1 emergency CABG - At least 3 reoperations - At least 3 simple mitral valve repair - At least 1 transcatheter valve
Suggested observations: 10
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Type of procedure
- aortic dissection
- Bentall
- emergency CABG
- reoperations
- simple mitral valve repair
- transcatheter valve
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Understands steps of procedure, potential risks, and means to avoid/overcome them
- ME 3.1 Gather/assess required information to reach diagnosis and determine correct procedure required
- ME 3.4 Patient correctly prepared and positioned, understands approach and required instruments, prepared to deal with probable complications
- ME 3.4 Efficiently performs steps, avoiding pitfalls and respecting soft tissues
- ME 3.4 3D spatial orientation and able to position instruments/hardware where intended
- ME 3.4 Appropriate complete post procedure plan
- ME 3.4 Obvious planned course of procedure with economy of movement and flow
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Professional and effective communication/utilization of staff
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
TTP-5
Managing a cardiac surgery clinic
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA will be observed in any clinic experience where the supervisor has the opportunity for a longitudinal observation of the resident - This EPA focuses on the management of clinical responsibilities over and above the care of individual patient conditions. This includes: o Triaging referrals and seeing them in an appropriate time frame o Managing OR booking and scheduling o Completing dictations in timely manner o Reviewing test results/acting on results appropriately and in timely manner o Working effectively with the staff and/or other learners in the clinic
Direct and/or indirect observation by supervisor, with input from clinic staff, based on longitudinal observation Use Form 1 Collect 2 observations during Transition to Practice
Suggested observations: 2
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 1.6 Prioritize referrals on the basis of clinical urgency
- ME 2.2 Select investigations to facilitate timely patient assessment and triage
Collaborator
- COL 1.3 Address the questions and concerns of the referring/primary care physician when acting in the consultant role
- COL 1.3 Provide accurate, timely, and relevant written information to the referring/primary care physician
- COL 1.2 Make effective use of the scope and expertise of other health care professionals 11 COL 2.1Delegate tasks and responsibilities in an appropriate and respectful manner
Leader
- L 2.1 Allocate health care resources for optimal patient care
- L 4.2 Manage OR booking and scheduling
- L 4.1 Manage time effectively in the ambulatory clinic
- L 4.1 Review and act on test results in a timely manner
Professional
- P 1.1 Respond punctually to requests from patients or other health care providers
- P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviours
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
TTP-6
Monitoring cardiac surgical practice for the purposes of continuous quality improvement
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA requires the resident to submit a report of their surgical practice - This must include a log of cases performed, complications in those cases and a comparison to the range of acceptable outcomes - It should include the identification of an area on which to focus further improvement/development
Competence Committee assesses achievement based on review of resident’s submission of one report Use Form 4.
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Medical Expert
- ME 5.1 Identify potential improvement opportunities arising from performance data
- ME 5.2 Adopt strategies that address system factors in clinical practice
Scholar
- S 1.2 Seek and interpret multiple sources of performance data to continuously improve performance
Professional
- P 1.2 Maintain a log of procedures and their outcomes
- P 2.1 Demonstrate a commitment to maintaining and enhancing competence
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.
TTP-7
Contributing cardiac surgery expertise as a member of an interprofessional heart team
Key features and assessment plan
- This EPA focuses on shared decision making with other health care professionals, and working effectively as a member of an interprofessional team. This may include any interprofessional heart team, examples include: transcatheter valve teams, heart failure teams, revascularization teams, congenital heart disease teams - This EPA includes contributing medical expertise to the team discussion, advocating for the patient and demonstrating professional behaviour
Direct observation by supervisor Use Form 1. Form collects information on: - Role of observer: cardiac surgeon; cardiologist; anesthesiologist; other physician; other health care professional Collect feedback from 4 observers - At least 1 cardiac surgeon - At least 1 cardiologist - At least 1 anesthesiologist
Entrustment (how much supervision did this activity need?)
- I had to do
- I had to talk them through
- I needed to prompt
- I needed to be there just in case
- I didn’t need to be there
Role of observer
- cardiac surgeon
- cardiologist
- anesthesiologist
- other physician
- other health care professional
Medical Expert
- ME 1.4 Apply a broad base and depth of knowledge in clinical and biomedical sciences to manage the breadth of patient presentations in Cardiac Surgery
- ME 3.3 Advocate for a patient’s procedure or therapy on the basis of urgency and available resources
Collaborator
- COL 1.1 Establish positive relationships with other members of the health care team
- COL 1.3 Communicate effectively with physicians and other health care professionals
- COL 2.2 Achieve consensus when there are differences in recommendations provided by other health care professionals
Leader
- L 2.1 Allocate health care resources for optimal patient care
Scholar
- S 3.4 Integrate best evidence and clinical expertise into decision-making
Professional
- P 1.1 Exhibit appropriate professional behaviours
Case description
Feedback provided
Next steps
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Referenced and produced with permission.